磁共振成像检测脑部恶性疾病中的肿瘤缺氧:验证研究的系统回顾

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100940
Y. Bai , E.C. Osmundson , M.J. Donahue , J.B. De Vis
{"title":"磁共振成像检测脑部恶性疾病中的肿瘤缺氧:验证研究的系统回顾","authors":"Y. Bai ,&nbsp;E.C. Osmundson ,&nbsp;M.J. Donahue ,&nbsp;J.B. De Vis","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tumor hypoxia indicates a worse prognosis in brain malignancies; however, current gold-standard methods for assessing tumor hypoxia are invasive and often inaccessible. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely available, but its validity for identifying tumor hypoxia or hypoxia-related neoangiogenesis is not well characterized. A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed and Embase Databases. The search query identified MRI studies that validated hypoxia-surrogate imaging sequences against gold-standard hypoxia or neoangiogenesis detection methods in patients with brain malignancies. Literature screen identified 23 manuscripts published between 2007 and 2022. Among conventional MRI sequences, peritumoral edema and signal change after contrast administration were associated with gold-standard oxygen-assessment methods. T2*- and T2′-derived measures were associated with gold-standard methods, while reports on quantitative measures of oxygen extraction fraction were conflicting. Fiber density, tissue cellularity, blood volume, vascular transit time, and permeability measurements were associated with gold-standard methods, whereas blood flow measurements yielded conflicting results. MRI measures are promising surrogates for tumor hypoxia or hypoxia-related neoangiogenesis. Additional studies are needed to reconcile disparate findings. Future sensitivity analyses are needed to establish the MRI methods most accurate at identifying tumor hypoxia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor hypoxia in brain malignant disease: A systematic review of validation studies\",\"authors\":\"Y. Bai ,&nbsp;E.C. Osmundson ,&nbsp;M.J. Donahue ,&nbsp;J.B. De Vis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tumor hypoxia indicates a worse prognosis in brain malignancies; however, current gold-standard methods for assessing tumor hypoxia are invasive and often inaccessible. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely available, but its validity for identifying tumor hypoxia or hypoxia-related neoangiogenesis is not well characterized. A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed and Embase Databases. The search query identified MRI studies that validated hypoxia-surrogate imaging sequences against gold-standard hypoxia or neoangiogenesis detection methods in patients with brain malignancies. Literature screen identified 23 manuscripts published between 2007 and 2022. Among conventional MRI sequences, peritumoral edema and signal change after contrast administration were associated with gold-standard oxygen-assessment methods. T2*- and T2′-derived measures were associated with gold-standard methods, while reports on quantitative measures of oxygen extraction fraction were conflicting. Fiber density, tissue cellularity, blood volume, vascular transit time, and permeability measurements were associated with gold-standard methods, whereas blood flow measurements yielded conflicting results. MRI measures are promising surrogates for tumor hypoxia or hypoxia-related neoangiogenesis. Additional studies are needed to reconcile disparate findings. Future sensitivity analyses are needed to establish the MRI methods most accurate at identifying tumor hypoxia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor hypoxia in brain malignant disease: A systematic review of validation studies
Tumor hypoxia indicates a worse prognosis in brain malignancies; however, current gold-standard methods for assessing tumor hypoxia are invasive and often inaccessible. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely available, but its validity for identifying tumor hypoxia or hypoxia-related neoangiogenesis is not well characterized. A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed and Embase Databases. The search query identified MRI studies that validated hypoxia-surrogate imaging sequences against gold-standard hypoxia or neoangiogenesis detection methods in patients with brain malignancies. Literature screen identified 23 manuscripts published between 2007 and 2022. Among conventional MRI sequences, peritumoral edema and signal change after contrast administration were associated with gold-standard oxygen-assessment methods. T2*- and T2′-derived measures were associated with gold-standard methods, while reports on quantitative measures of oxygen extraction fraction were conflicting. Fiber density, tissue cellularity, blood volume, vascular transit time, and permeability measurements were associated with gold-standard methods, whereas blood flow measurements yielded conflicting results. MRI measures are promising surrogates for tumor hypoxia or hypoxia-related neoangiogenesis. Additional studies are needed to reconcile disparate findings. Future sensitivity analyses are needed to establish the MRI methods most accurate at identifying tumor hypoxia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor hypoxia in brain malignant disease: A systematic review of validation studies Clinical outcomes and risk factors for local failure and visual impairment in patients treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma The doses to Organs at risk and their Proximity to target volumes are crucial Determinants of brachytherapy toxicity Recovery of quality of life in 574 patients with inoperable lung cancer undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy Mepitel® film versus standard care for the prevention of skin toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1