核心稳定训练对轻度和中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05612-7
Xiaomei Liu, Yanyang Wang, Min Liu, Yu Zhang, Qiang Wu, Qian Wang
{"title":"核心稳定训练对轻度和中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiaomei Liu, Yanyang Wang, Min Liu, Yu Zhang, Qiang Wu, Qian Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05612-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is one of the most prevalent spinal abnormalities. Core stabilization exercise (CSE) has become a common approach in the treatment of AIS. However, the efficacy of CSE in AIS remains a subject of debate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of CSE in the patients with AIS in comparison with different intervention programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wan Fang, Wei Pu, and CNKI databases, encompassing literature from their inception through December 31st, 2024. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, with inter-rater agreement evaluated via kappa scores. Randomized control trials that focus on the efficacy and safety of CSE in AIS population were included in this systematic review. The risk of bias assessment was performed utilizing the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools (NIH-QAT). After quality assessments and information extraction, the meta-analysis was conducted with Review manager and the standard mean difference (SMD) was pooled among the measurement data derived from different studies. Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, apical vertebral rotation, Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale, Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, SRS-22,, were focused as outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies involving 449 subjects were included in this systematic review. The average Cobb angle was 22.86° ± 8.79°, and the intervention duration varied from 8weeks to 6months. The kappa score was 0.93. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the different control groups, National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools (NIH-QAT) results, and intervention durations. The results indicated that CSE could have greater effect sizes than the blank control group on Cobb angle (MD = -4.37, P < 0.05), angle of trunk rotation (MD = -1.07, P < 0.05), apical vertebral rotation (MD = -0.44, P < 0.05), quality of life as SRS-22 (MD = 0.22, P < 0.05). Notably, the efficacy of CSE appears to be weaker than that of the three-dimensional exercise group in terms of Cobb angle (MD = 3.95, P < 0.05), angle of trunk rotation (MD = 1.69, P < 0.05) and WASRS scores (MD = 0.89, P < 0.05). Other subgroup analyses yielded no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study showed that core stabilization exercise may be beneficial for the patients with mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, albeit less effective than three-dimensional exercises following short-term follow-up. The evidence on the efficacy of CSE is limited due to heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and multiple comparisons. The clinical trials focusing on patient compliance and training quality with long-term follow-up are warranted.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD 42022367714.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of core stabilization exercise in mild and moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomei Liu, Yanyang Wang, Min Liu, Yu Zhang, Qiang Wu, Qian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-05612-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is one of the most prevalent spinal abnormalities. Core stabilization exercise (CSE) has become a common approach in the treatment of AIS. However, the efficacy of CSE in AIS remains a subject of debate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of CSE in the patients with AIS in comparison with different intervention programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wan Fang, Wei Pu, and CNKI databases, encompassing literature from their inception through December 31st, 2024. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, with inter-rater agreement evaluated via kappa scores. Randomized control trials that focus on the efficacy and safety of CSE in AIS population were included in this systematic review. The risk of bias assessment was performed utilizing the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools (NIH-QAT). After quality assessments and information extraction, the meta-analysis was conducted with Review manager and the standard mean difference (SMD) was pooled among the measurement data derived from different studies. Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, apical vertebral rotation, Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale, Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, SRS-22,, were focused as outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies involving 449 subjects were included in this systematic review. The average Cobb angle was 22.86° ± 8.79°, and the intervention duration varied from 8weeks to 6months. The kappa score was 0.93. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the different control groups, National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools (NIH-QAT) results, and intervention durations. The results indicated that CSE could have greater effect sizes than the blank control group on Cobb angle (MD = -4.37, P < 0.05), angle of trunk rotation (MD = -1.07, P < 0.05), apical vertebral rotation (MD = -0.44, P < 0.05), quality of life as SRS-22 (MD = 0.22, P < 0.05). Notably, the efficacy of CSE appears to be weaker than that of the three-dimensional exercise group in terms of Cobb angle (MD = 3.95, P < 0.05), angle of trunk rotation (MD = 1.69, P < 0.05) and WASRS scores (MD = 0.89, P < 0.05). Other subgroup analyses yielded no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study showed that core stabilization exercise may be beneficial for the patients with mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, albeit less effective than three-dimensional exercises following short-term follow-up. The evidence on the efficacy of CSE is limited due to heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and multiple comparisons. The clinical trials focusing on patient compliance and training quality with long-term follow-up are warranted.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD 42022367714.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05612-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05612-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)是最常见的脊柱异常之一。核心稳定练习(CSE)已成为治疗AIS的常用方法。然而,CSE在AIS中的疗效仍然是一个有争议的话题。目的:比较不同干预方案在AIS患者中的疗效。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、万方、卫普、CNKI等数据库,涵盖从建库到2024年12月31日的文献。两名独立的审稿人筛选了这些研究,通过kappa分数评估了评分者之间的一致性。本系统综述纳入了关注CSE在AIS人群中的有效性和安全性的随机对照试验。使用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具(NIH-QAT)进行偏倚风险评估。在质量评估和信息提取后,使用Review manager进行meta分析,并对不同研究的测量数据进行标准均差(SMD)汇总。以Cobb角、躯干旋转角、椎体顶端旋转、Walter Reed视觉评定量表、躯干后对称指数、用力肺活量(FVC)、1s用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC、SRS-22为观察指标。结果:本系统综述共纳入10项研究,涉及449名受试者。平均Cobb角为22.86°±8.79°,干预时间从8周到6个月不等。kappa评分为0.93。根据不同的对照组、美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具(NIH-QAT)结果和干预时间进行亚组分析。结果表明,CSE对Cobb角的效应量大于空白对照组(MD = -4.37, P)。结论:本研究表明,核心稳定运动对轻中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者可能有益,但短期随访后的效果不如三维运动。由于异质性、小样本量和多重比较,关于CSE疗效的证据有限。临床试验的重点是患者的依从性和培训质量与长期随访是必要的。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD 42022367714。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of core stabilization exercise in mild and moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is one of the most prevalent spinal abnormalities. Core stabilization exercise (CSE) has become a common approach in the treatment of AIS. However, the efficacy of CSE in AIS remains a subject of debate.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of CSE in the patients with AIS in comparison with different intervention programs.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wan Fang, Wei Pu, and CNKI databases, encompassing literature from their inception through December 31st, 2024. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, with inter-rater agreement evaluated via kappa scores. Randomized control trials that focus on the efficacy and safety of CSE in AIS population were included in this systematic review. The risk of bias assessment was performed utilizing the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools (NIH-QAT). After quality assessments and information extraction, the meta-analysis was conducted with Review manager and the standard mean difference (SMD) was pooled among the measurement data derived from different studies. Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, apical vertebral rotation, Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale, Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, SRS-22,, were focused as outcomes.

Results: A total of 10 studies involving 449 subjects were included in this systematic review. The average Cobb angle was 22.86° ± 8.79°, and the intervention duration varied from 8weeks to 6months. The kappa score was 0.93. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the different control groups, National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools (NIH-QAT) results, and intervention durations. The results indicated that CSE could have greater effect sizes than the blank control group on Cobb angle (MD = -4.37, P < 0.05), angle of trunk rotation (MD = -1.07, P < 0.05), apical vertebral rotation (MD = -0.44, P < 0.05), quality of life as SRS-22 (MD = 0.22, P < 0.05). Notably, the efficacy of CSE appears to be weaker than that of the three-dimensional exercise group in terms of Cobb angle (MD = 3.95, P < 0.05), angle of trunk rotation (MD = 1.69, P < 0.05) and WASRS scores (MD = 0.89, P < 0.05). Other subgroup analyses yielded no statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: The present study showed that core stabilization exercise may be beneficial for the patients with mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, albeit less effective than three-dimensional exercises following short-term follow-up. The evidence on the efficacy of CSE is limited due to heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and multiple comparisons. The clinical trials focusing on patient compliance and training quality with long-term follow-up are warranted.

Prospero registration number: CRD 42022367714.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
3D bioprinted bilayer GelMA/HAp hydrogel scaffold functionalized with miR-140-5p-modified MSCs for enhanced osteochondral regeneration. Internal brace augmentation versus modified brostrom-gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional and radiographic outcomes. Association between vertebral endplate defects and low back pain: an integrative omics study revealing the role of lipotoxicity-induced EGFR/COX-2 signalling. Postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy of perifracture site injections for pain control following distal radius and ankle fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1