便携式超声波检查对早期发现肺活检后气胸的疗效。

IF 3.6 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.4046/trd.2024.0178
Won Gun Kwack, Manbong Heo, Yeonseok Choi, Cheon Woong Choi, Byoung Soo Kwon, Yeon Wook Kim, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Ho Lee, Sung Yoon Lim
{"title":"便携式超声波检查对早期发现肺活检后气胸的疗效。","authors":"Won Gun Kwack, Manbong Heo, Yeonseok Choi, Cheon Woong Choi, Byoung Soo Kwon, Yeon Wook Kim, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Ho Lee, Sung Yoon Lim","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumothorax is a notable complication of lung biopsy, and its early detection is crucial. This study aimed to compare the sensitivities of handheld portable lung ultrasonography and chest radiography in identifying early pneumothorax post-lung biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Upright chest radiography and lung ultrasonography were conducted at 3 and 24 hours following lung biopsy. The disappearance of lung sliding and the appearance of lung points on lung ultrasonography were indicative of pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 86 patients, 23 were diagnosed with pneumothorax within 24 hours post-biopsy. No significant differences in sex, age, or baseline lung function were noted between the pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax groups. The sensitivities of lung ultrasonography and chest radiography for detecting pneumothorax were 73.9% and 47.8%, respectively, at 3 hours and 91.3% and 78.3%, respectively, at 24 hours. Additionally, at 3 hours, the area under the curve for lung ultrasonography in diagnosing pneumothorax was significantly higher than that for chest radiography (0.870 vs. 0.739, p=0.043); however, the difference was not significant at 24 hours (p=0.254).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary findings indicate that lung ultrasonography is more sensitive than chest radiography in detecting early pneumothorax following lung biopsy and could be beneficial for rapid pneumothorax diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"575-582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Portable Ultrasonography for Early Detection of Pneumothorax Following Lung Biopsy.\",\"authors\":\"Won Gun Kwack, Manbong Heo, Yeonseok Choi, Cheon Woong Choi, Byoung Soo Kwon, Yeon Wook Kim, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Ho Lee, Sung Yoon Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.4046/trd.2024.0178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumothorax is a notable complication of lung biopsy, and its early detection is crucial. This study aimed to compare the sensitivities of handheld portable lung ultrasonography and chest radiography in identifying early pneumothorax post-lung biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Upright chest radiography and lung ultrasonography were conducted at 3 and 24 hours following lung biopsy. The disappearance of lung sliding and the appearance of lung points on lung ultrasonography were indicative of pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 86 patients, 23 were diagnosed with pneumothorax within 24 hours post-biopsy. No significant differences in sex, age, or baseline lung function were noted between the pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax groups. The sensitivities of lung ultrasonography and chest radiography for detecting pneumothorax were 73.9% and 47.8%, respectively, at 3 hours and 91.3% and 78.3%, respectively, at 24 hours. Additionally, at 3 hours, the area under the curve for lung ultrasonography in diagnosing pneumothorax was significantly higher than that for chest radiography (0.870 vs. 0.739, p=0.043); however, the difference was not significant at 24 hours (p=0.254).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary findings indicate that lung ultrasonography is more sensitive than chest radiography in detecting early pneumothorax following lung biopsy and could be beneficial for rapid pneumothorax diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"575-582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235288/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2024.0178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2024.0178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:气胸是肺活检的重要并发症,早期发现至关重要。本研究旨在比较手持式便携式肺超声检查与胸片检查对肺活检后早期气胸的敏感性。方法:在肺活检后3、24小时分别行直立胸片和肺超声检查。肺滑动消失,肺点出现,超声检查认为是气胸的证据。结果:在本研究的86例患者中,23例在活检24小时内被诊断为气胸。气胸组和非气胸组在性别、年龄或基线肺功能方面没有显著差异。肺超声和胸片检查气胸3小时的灵敏度分别为73.9%和47.8%,24小时的灵敏度分别为91.3%和78.3%。3 h时,肺超声诊断气胸曲线下面积明显高于胸片(0.870 vs. 0.739, p = 0.043);但在24小时时,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.254)。结论:肺部超声检查对肺活检后早期气胸的发现比胸片检查更敏感,有利于气胸的快速诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Portable Ultrasonography for Early Detection of Pneumothorax Following Lung Biopsy.

Background: Pneumothorax is a notable complication of lung biopsy, and its early detection is crucial. This study aimed to compare the sensitivities of handheld portable lung ultrasonography and chest radiography in identifying early pneumothorax post-lung biopsy.

Methods: Upright chest radiography and lung ultrasonography were conducted at 3 and 24 hours following lung biopsy. The disappearance of lung sliding and the appearance of lung points on lung ultrasonography were indicative of pneumothorax.

Results: In this study of 86 patients, 23 were diagnosed with pneumothorax within 24 hours post-biopsy. No significant differences in sex, age, or baseline lung function were noted between the pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax groups. The sensitivities of lung ultrasonography and chest radiography for detecting pneumothorax were 73.9% and 47.8%, respectively, at 3 hours and 91.3% and 78.3%, respectively, at 24 hours. Additionally, at 3 hours, the area under the curve for lung ultrasonography in diagnosing pneumothorax was significantly higher than that for chest radiography (0.870 vs. 0.739, p=0.043); however, the difference was not significant at 24 hours (p=0.254).

Conclusion: These preliminary findings indicate that lung ultrasonography is more sensitive than chest radiography in detecting early pneumothorax following lung biopsy and could be beneficial for rapid pneumothorax diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nationwide Incidence and Prevalence of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in South Korea. A Multicenter Registry for Rare Interstitial Lung Diseases in Korea: Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes. Use of anticoagulants as a supportive measure in pulmonary hypertension: a narrative review. Real-world safety of FF/UMEC/VI in patients with asthma or COPD, and clinical outcomes in COPD: post-marketing surveillance in Korea. Recent Updates on Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Its Clinical Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1