IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05698-9
Lingshan Zhu, Xichen Du, Gang Fu, Li Wang, Hong Huang, Xiaohong Wu, Binting Xu
{"title":"Efficacy of different forms of concentrated growth factors combined with deproteinized bovine bone minerals in guided bone regeneration: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Lingshan Zhu, Xichen Du, Gang Fu, Li Wang, Hong Huang, Xiaohong Wu, Binting Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05698-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the bone regeneration effect of different forms of concentrated growth factor (CGF) when combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) for simultaneous implant-guided bone regeneration (GBR) and its impact on postoperative adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-seven patients who underwent simultaneous implant GBR were selected for the study and divided into three groups. The study involved three groups: the gel phase concentrated growth factor (GPCGF) group, which used GPCGF-DBBM mixture; the liquid phase concentrated growth factor (LPCGF) group, which used LPCGF-DBBM mixture; and the control group, which used DBBM alone. The thickness of the buccal lateral bones was measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and patients were asked to complete questionnaires to assess primary adverse reactions during the first week after surgery. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The buccal lateral bone thickness in the GPCGF, LPCGF, and control groups decreased significantly at 6 months post-surgery compared to immediately after surgery. The change of bone thickness in the GPCGF group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.01), and that in the LPCGF group did not differ from that in the control group (p > 0.05). During the postoperative week, statistically significant differences could be observed in bleeding, mouth opening, chewing, sleeping, speaking, daily routine, and pain (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the DBBM applied alone, the GPCGF-DBBM mixture has more positive implications for reducing bone resorption, promoting bone reconstruction and relieving certain postoperative adverse effects in dental implants with simultaneous GBR. The GPCGF-DBBM mixture was superior to the LPCGF-DBBM mixture in alleviating adverse effects in terms of bleeding and speaking after GBR.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration number: </strong>The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, NO. ChiCTR2300070107 (03/04/2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05698-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨不同形式的浓缩生长因子(CGF)与脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM)联合用于同期种植体引导骨再生(GBR)的骨再生效果及其对术后不良反应的影响:研究选择了 57 名接受同步种植体 GBR 的患者,并将其分为三组。研究分为三组:凝胶相浓缩生长因子(GPCGF)组,使用 GPCGF-DBBM 混合液;液相浓缩生长因子(LPCGF)组,使用 LPCGF-DBBM 混合液;对照组,单独使用 DBBM。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测量颊侧骨的厚度,并要求患者填写调查问卷,以评估术后第一周的主要不良反应。数据采用单因素方差分析、Tukey 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行分析:结果:GPCGF组、LPCGF组和对照组的颊侧骨厚度在术后6个月与术后初期相比明显下降。GPCGF 组的骨厚度变化低于对照组(P 0.05)。术后一周内,在出血、张口、咀嚼、睡眠、说话、日常生活和疼痛等方面均可观察到统计学意义上的显著差异(P 结论:GPCGF 组与对照组相比,在出血、张口、咀嚼、睡眠、说话、日常生活和疼痛等方面均可观察到统计学意义上的显著差异:与单独使用 DBBM 相比,GPCGF-DBBM 混合物在减少骨吸收、促进骨重建和缓解同时使用 GBR 的牙科种植体的某些术后不良反应方面具有更积极的意义。GPCGF-DBBM混合物在减轻GBR术后出血和说话等不良反应方面优于LPCGF-DBBM混合物:中国临床试验注册中心,NO.ChiCTR2300070107(03/04/2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of different forms of concentrated growth factors combined with deproteinized bovine bone minerals in guided bone regeneration: a randomized clinical trial.

Objectives: To explore the bone regeneration effect of different forms of concentrated growth factor (CGF) when combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) for simultaneous implant-guided bone regeneration (GBR) and its impact on postoperative adverse reactions.

Methods: Fifty-seven patients who underwent simultaneous implant GBR were selected for the study and divided into three groups. The study involved three groups: the gel phase concentrated growth factor (GPCGF) group, which used GPCGF-DBBM mixture; the liquid phase concentrated growth factor (LPCGF) group, which used LPCGF-DBBM mixture; and the control group, which used DBBM alone. The thickness of the buccal lateral bones was measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and patients were asked to complete questionnaires to assess primary adverse reactions during the first week after surgery. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: The buccal lateral bone thickness in the GPCGF, LPCGF, and control groups decreased significantly at 6 months post-surgery compared to immediately after surgery. The change of bone thickness in the GPCGF group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.01), and that in the LPCGF group did not differ from that in the control group (p > 0.05). During the postoperative week, statistically significant differences could be observed in bleeding, mouth opening, chewing, sleeping, speaking, daily routine, and pain (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared to the DBBM applied alone, the GPCGF-DBBM mixture has more positive implications for reducing bone resorption, promoting bone reconstruction and relieving certain postoperative adverse effects in dental implants with simultaneous GBR. The GPCGF-DBBM mixture was superior to the LPCGF-DBBM mixture in alleviating adverse effects in terms of bleeding and speaking after GBR.

Clinical trials registration number: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, NO. ChiCTR2300070107 (03/04/2023).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial effect of femtosecond laser against Enterococcus faecalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum biofilms on dentin: an in vitro study. Reconstructing defects following radical parotidectomy using superficial circumflex Iliac perforator flaps. The relationship between adequate keratinized mucosa and peri-implant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of canine movement on maxillary anterior en-masse retraction with clear aligners: a finite element study. Thermal behavior and cyclic fatigue resistance of three contemporary NiTi heat-treated single-file systems: metallurgical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1