人工智能驱动的腰骶神经根异常的3D MRI:准确性,发生率和临床应用。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s00234-025-03574-5
Daisuke Ukeba, Ken Nagahama, Katsuhisa Yamada, Yuichiro Abe, Yoshinori Hyugaji, Tsutomu Endo, Takashi Ohnishi, Hiroyuki Tachi, Yuichi Hasegawa, Hideki Sudo, Norimasa Iwasaki
{"title":"人工智能驱动的腰骶神经根异常的3D MRI:准确性,发生率和临床应用。","authors":"Daisuke Ukeba, Ken Nagahama, Katsuhisa Yamada, Yuichiro Abe, Yoshinori Hyugaji, Tsutomu Endo, Takashi Ohnishi, Hiroyuki Tachi, Yuichi Hasegawa, Hideki Sudo, Norimasa Iwasaki","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03574-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lumbosacral nerve root anomalies are relatively rare but can be a risk factor for intraoperative nerve injury. However, it is often difficult to evaluate them with preoperative imaging. We developed a software that automatically generates three-dimensional (3D) nerve root images from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using artificial intelligence (AI). This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and utility of this modality in clinical practice by conducting an epidemiological study of nerve root anomalies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The incidence and morphology of nerve root anomalies were evaluated in the 3D images of 1,500 patients. The accuracy of the images was evaluated by comparing the images generated automatically using this AI software with those created manually by conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,500 cases, 53 (3.5%) had nerve root anomalies with total of 58 nerve root anomalies. With respect to the spinal level, 35 nerve root anomalies were found in the L5-S1 level, the most common (60.3%). As for morphology, 47 nerve roots (81.0%) were of the Neidre-MacNab classification Type 1. The images matched in 1,493 out of 1,500 cases (99.5%) between the two methods, and the remaining 7 cases all had nerve root abnormalities, which were detected as abnormal by the AI software.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MR nerve root 3D imaging provided a 3D visualization and understanding of nerve root morphology, including nerve root anomalies. The AI software enables easy and precise 3D nerve root imaging, which greatly aids in the preoperative evaluation for spinal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-driven 3D MRI of lumbosacral nerve root anomalies: accuracy, incidence, and clinical utility.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Ukeba, Ken Nagahama, Katsuhisa Yamada, Yuichiro Abe, Yoshinori Hyugaji, Tsutomu Endo, Takashi Ohnishi, Hiroyuki Tachi, Yuichi Hasegawa, Hideki Sudo, Norimasa Iwasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-025-03574-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lumbosacral nerve root anomalies are relatively rare but can be a risk factor for intraoperative nerve injury. However, it is often difficult to evaluate them with preoperative imaging. We developed a software that automatically generates three-dimensional (3D) nerve root images from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using artificial intelligence (AI). This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and utility of this modality in clinical practice by conducting an epidemiological study of nerve root anomalies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The incidence and morphology of nerve root anomalies were evaluated in the 3D images of 1,500 patients. The accuracy of the images was evaluated by comparing the images generated automatically using this AI software with those created manually by conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,500 cases, 53 (3.5%) had nerve root anomalies with total of 58 nerve root anomalies. With respect to the spinal level, 35 nerve root anomalies were found in the L5-S1 level, the most common (60.3%). As for morphology, 47 nerve roots (81.0%) were of the Neidre-MacNab classification Type 1. The images matched in 1,493 out of 1,500 cases (99.5%) between the two methods, and the remaining 7 cases all had nerve root abnormalities, which were detected as abnormal by the AI software.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MR nerve root 3D imaging provided a 3D visualization and understanding of nerve root morphology, including nerve root anomalies. The AI software enables easy and precise 3D nerve root imaging, which greatly aids in the preoperative evaluation for spinal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1095-1101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03574-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03574-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腰骶神经根异常相对罕见,但可能是术中神经损伤的危险因素。然而,术前影像学检查往往难以对其进行评估。我们开发了一种软件,可以利用人工智能(AI)从磁共振(MR)成像中自动生成三维(3D)神经根图像。本研究旨在通过对神经根异常的流行病学研究来评估这种模式在临床实践中的准确性和实用性。方法:对1500例患者的三维图像进行神经根异常的发生率和形态评价。通过将使用该人工智能软件自动生成的图像与传统方法手动创建的图像进行比较,评估图像的准确性。结果:1500例患者中,神经根异常53例(3.5%),神经根异常58例。在脊髓水平,L5-S1水平有35例神经根异常,最常见(60.3%)。形态学上,Neidre-MacNab 1型神经根47根(81.0%)。1500例患者中有1493例(99.5%)的图像匹配,其余7例患者均有神经根异常,人工智能软件将其检测为异常。结论:MR神经根三维成像提供了神经根形态的三维可视化和了解,包括神经根异常。人工智能软件可以实现简单而精确的三维神经根成像,这对脊柱手术的术前评估有很大帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence-driven 3D MRI of lumbosacral nerve root anomalies: accuracy, incidence, and clinical utility.

Purpose: Lumbosacral nerve root anomalies are relatively rare but can be a risk factor for intraoperative nerve injury. However, it is often difficult to evaluate them with preoperative imaging. We developed a software that automatically generates three-dimensional (3D) nerve root images from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using artificial intelligence (AI). This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and utility of this modality in clinical practice by conducting an epidemiological study of nerve root anomalies.

Methods: The incidence and morphology of nerve root anomalies were evaluated in the 3D images of 1,500 patients. The accuracy of the images was evaluated by comparing the images generated automatically using this AI software with those created manually by conventional methods.

Results: Of 1,500 cases, 53 (3.5%) had nerve root anomalies with total of 58 nerve root anomalies. With respect to the spinal level, 35 nerve root anomalies were found in the L5-S1 level, the most common (60.3%). As for morphology, 47 nerve roots (81.0%) were of the Neidre-MacNab classification Type 1. The images matched in 1,493 out of 1,500 cases (99.5%) between the two methods, and the remaining 7 cases all had nerve root abnormalities, which were detected as abnormal by the AI software.

Conclusion: The MR nerve root 3D imaging provided a 3D visualization and understanding of nerve root morphology, including nerve root anomalies. The AI software enables easy and precise 3D nerve root imaging, which greatly aids in the preoperative evaluation for spinal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
期刊最新文献
European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR). Transradial approach in patients with brachial artery fibromuscular dysplasia: implications of lesion morphology for access route selection. Quantitative assessment of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis of various intraocular lesions. Association of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic plaque with vessel tortuosity and white matter hyperintensity. Can cervical spine axial GRE imaging replace FSE T2 axial imaging in the evaluation of central canal stenosis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1