用机器学习估计成人移植患者更昔洛韦暴露。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY AAPS Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1208/s12248-025-01034-9
Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage, Marc Labriffe, Pierre-André Billat, Cyrielle Codde, Selim Arraki Zava, Pierre Marquet, Jean-Baptiste Woillard
{"title":"用机器学习估计成人移植患者更昔洛韦暴露。","authors":"Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage, Marc Labriffe, Pierre-André Billat, Cyrielle Codde, Selim Arraki Zava, Pierre Marquet, Jean-Baptiste Woillard","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01034-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Valganciclovir, a prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is used to prevent cytomegalovirus infection after transplantation, with doses adjusted based on creatinine clearance (CrCL) to target GCV AUC0-24 h of 40-60 mg*h/L. This sometimes leads to overexposure or underexposure. This study aimed to train, test and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms for accurate GCV AUC0-24 h estimation in solid organ transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We simulated patients for different dosing regimen (900 mg/24 h, 450 mg/24 h, 450 mg/48 h, 450 mg/72 h) using two literature population pharmacokinetic models, allocating 75% for training and 25% for testing. Simulations from two other literature models and real patients provided validation datasets. Three independent sets of ML algorithms were created for each regimen, incorporating CrCL and 2 or 3 concentrations. We evaluated their performance on testing and validation datasets and compared them with MAP-BE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>XGBoost using 3 concentrations generated the most accurate predictions. In testing dataset, they exhibited a relative bias of -0.02 to 1.5% and a relative RMSE of 2.6 to 8.5%. In the validation dataset, a relative bias of 1.5 to 5.8% and 8.9 to 16.5%, and a relative RMSE of 8.5 to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% were observed depending on the model used. XGBoost algorithms outperformed or matched MAP-BE, showing enhanced generalization and robustness in their estimates. When applied to real patients' data, algorithms using 2 concentrations showed relative bias of 1.26% and relative RMSE of 12.68%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XGBoost ML models accurately estimated GCV AUC0-24 h from limited samples and CrCL, providing a strategy for optimized therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Ganciclovir Exposure in Adults Transplant Patients by Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage, Marc Labriffe, Pierre-André Billat, Cyrielle Codde, Selim Arraki Zava, Pierre Marquet, Jean-Baptiste Woillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-025-01034-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Valganciclovir, a prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is used to prevent cytomegalovirus infection after transplantation, with doses adjusted based on creatinine clearance (CrCL) to target GCV AUC0-24 h of 40-60 mg*h/L. This sometimes leads to overexposure or underexposure. This study aimed to train, test and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms for accurate GCV AUC0-24 h estimation in solid organ transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We simulated patients for different dosing regimen (900 mg/24 h, 450 mg/24 h, 450 mg/48 h, 450 mg/72 h) using two literature population pharmacokinetic models, allocating 75% for training and 25% for testing. Simulations from two other literature models and real patients provided validation datasets. Three independent sets of ML algorithms were created for each regimen, incorporating CrCL and 2 or 3 concentrations. We evaluated their performance on testing and validation datasets and compared them with MAP-BE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>XGBoost using 3 concentrations generated the most accurate predictions. In testing dataset, they exhibited a relative bias of -0.02 to 1.5% and a relative RMSE of 2.6 to 8.5%. In the validation dataset, a relative bias of 1.5 to 5.8% and 8.9 to 16.5%, and a relative RMSE of 8.5 to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% were observed depending on the model used. XGBoost algorithms outperformed or matched MAP-BE, showing enhanced generalization and robustness in their estimates. When applied to real patients' data, algorithms using 2 concentrations showed relative bias of 1.26% and relative RMSE of 12.68%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XGBoost ML models accurately estimated GCV AUC0-24 h from limited samples and CrCL, providing a strategy for optimized therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01034-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01034-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:缬更昔洛韦是更昔洛韦(GCV)的前药,用于预防移植后巨细胞病毒感染,剂量根据肌酐清除率(CrCL)调整,靶GCV AUC0-24 h为40-60 mg*h/L。这有时会导致曝光过度或曝光不足。本研究旨在训练、测试和验证机器学习(ML)算法,以准确估计实体器官移植中GCV AUC0-24 h。方法:采用两种文献群体药代动力学模型模拟不同给药方案(900 mg/24 h、450 mg/24 h、450 mg/48 h、450 mg/72 h)的患者,其中75%用于训练,25%用于试验。另外两个文献模型和真实患者的模拟提供了验证数据集。为每个方案创建三组独立的ML算法,包括CrCL和2或3浓度。我们评估了它们在测试和验证数据集上的性能,并将它们与MAP-BE进行了比较。结果:XGBoost使用3种浓度产生了最准确的预测。在测试数据集中,他们表现出相对偏差为-0.02至1.5%,相对RMSE为2.6至8.5%。在验证数据集中,根据所使用的模型,观察到相对偏差为1.5至5.8%和8.9至16.5%,相对RMSE为8.5至9.6%和10.7%至19.7%。XGBoost算法优于或匹配MAP-BE,在其估计中显示出增强的泛化和鲁棒性。当应用于真实患者数据时,使用两种浓度的算法的相对偏倚为1.26%,相对RMSE为12.68%。结论:XGBoost ML模型可以准确地从有限的样本和CrCL中估计GCV AUC0-24 h,为优化治疗药物监测提供策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of Ganciclovir Exposure in Adults Transplant Patients by Machine Learning.

Introduction: Valganciclovir, a prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is used to prevent cytomegalovirus infection after transplantation, with doses adjusted based on creatinine clearance (CrCL) to target GCV AUC0-24 h of 40-60 mg*h/L. This sometimes leads to overexposure or underexposure. This study aimed to train, test and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms for accurate GCV AUC0-24 h estimation in solid organ transplantation.

Methods: We simulated patients for different dosing regimen (900 mg/24 h, 450 mg/24 h, 450 mg/48 h, 450 mg/72 h) using two literature population pharmacokinetic models, allocating 75% for training and 25% for testing. Simulations from two other literature models and real patients provided validation datasets. Three independent sets of ML algorithms were created for each regimen, incorporating CrCL and 2 or 3 concentrations. We evaluated their performance on testing and validation datasets and compared them with MAP-BE.

Results: XGBoost using 3 concentrations generated the most accurate predictions. In testing dataset, they exhibited a relative bias of -0.02 to 1.5% and a relative RMSE of 2.6 to 8.5%. In the validation dataset, a relative bias of 1.5 to 5.8% and 8.9 to 16.5%, and a relative RMSE of 8.5 to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% were observed depending on the model used. XGBoost algorithms outperformed or matched MAP-BE, showing enhanced generalization and robustness in their estimates. When applied to real patients' data, algorithms using 2 concentrations showed relative bias of 1.26% and relative RMSE of 12.68%.

Conclusions: XGBoost ML models accurately estimated GCV AUC0-24 h from limited samples and CrCL, providing a strategy for optimized therapeutic drug monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
期刊最新文献
Biodistribution of Cerivastatin, Repaglinide, Glyburide, Rosuvastatin, and Valsartan in Cynomolgus Monkeys and PBPK Analysis. Predicting Aberrant Fc-fusion Protein Pharmacokinetics from In Silico Structural Properties and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling. Spatiotemporal Profiling of Intratumoral Free Payload Distribution via MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry: Implications for Drug-to-Antibody Ratio Optimization in Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Virtual Bioequivalence Assessment of Long-acting Injectable Suspensions Using PBPK Modeling: Part 1. Impact of particle Size on Formulation Variability. Virtual Bioequivalence Assessment of Long-Acting Injectable Suspensions Using PBPK Modeling: Part 2. Type I Error and Safe Space Analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1