在欧洲 2 型糖尿病老人队列中重新审视蒙特利尔认知评估。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1177/13872877251318029
Natasa Popovic, Noemi Lois, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Rafael Simó, Lieza G Exalto
{"title":"在欧洲 2 型糖尿病老人队列中重新审视蒙特利尔认知评估。","authors":"Natasa Popovic, Noemi Lois, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Rafael Simó, Lieza G Exalto","doi":"10.1177/13872877251318029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIndividuals with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of developing both vascular and Alzheimer's dementia.ObjectiveThis prospective cross-sectional study assessed the screening ability of the standard Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score suggestive of mild cognitive impairment (<26) in a European cohort of individuals ≥65 of age with type 2 diabetes.MethodsParticipants of RECOGNISED, a European prospective EU-funded cohort study, were screened using MoCA. In addition, a 13-item Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB) with the Clinical Dementia Rating was undertaken to categorize participants as normocognitive (NC, n = 128) or mild cognitive impaired (MCI, n = 185). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the ability of MoCA cut-off scores to categorize patients as having MCI or not.ResultsThe standard MoCA cut-off of 25/26 demonstrated a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 51%, resulting in a false positive rate of 20%. ROC analysis showed that a MoCA cut-off of 24/25 has a better balance between sensitivity (81%) and specificity (62%), with a lower false positive rate of 16%. NTB results showed that the MCI group had the lowest norm-referenced percentile scores in the visuo-construction domain, a known early feature of Alzheimer's disease and a significant predictor of a rapid rate of disease progression.ConclusionsMoCA as a screening tool in individuals ≥65 with type 2 diabetes, overestimates the prevalence of MCI, even when applying lower cut-offs. More specific screening strategies are necessary, particularly targeting the visuo-construction domain, to effectively identify cognitive impairment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"585-594"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a European cohort of elderly living with type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Natasa Popovic, Noemi Lois, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Rafael Simó, Lieza G Exalto\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251318029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIndividuals with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of developing both vascular and Alzheimer's dementia.ObjectiveThis prospective cross-sectional study assessed the screening ability of the standard Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score suggestive of mild cognitive impairment (<26) in a European cohort of individuals ≥65 of age with type 2 diabetes.MethodsParticipants of RECOGNISED, a European prospective EU-funded cohort study, were screened using MoCA. In addition, a 13-item Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB) with the Clinical Dementia Rating was undertaken to categorize participants as normocognitive (NC, n = 128) or mild cognitive impaired (MCI, n = 185). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the ability of MoCA cut-off scores to categorize patients as having MCI or not.ResultsThe standard MoCA cut-off of 25/26 demonstrated a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 51%, resulting in a false positive rate of 20%. ROC analysis showed that a MoCA cut-off of 24/25 has a better balance between sensitivity (81%) and specificity (62%), with a lower false positive rate of 16%. NTB results showed that the MCI group had the lowest norm-referenced percentile scores in the visuo-construction domain, a known early feature of Alzheimer's disease and a significant predictor of a rapid rate of disease progression.ConclusionsMoCA as a screening tool in individuals ≥65 with type 2 diabetes, overestimates the prevalence of MCI, even when applying lower cut-offs. More specific screening strategies are necessary, particularly targeting the visuo-construction domain, to effectively identify cognitive impairment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"585-594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251318029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251318029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2型糖尿病患者患血管性痴呆和阿尔茨海默氏痴呆的风险增加。目的:本前瞻性横断面研究评估了提示轻度认知障碍的标准蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分的筛查能力(方法:欧盟资助的欧洲前瞻性队列研究recognition的参与者使用MoCA进行筛查。此外,采用13项神经心理测试(NTB)和临床痴呆评分,将参与者分为正常认知障碍(NC, n = 128)和轻度认知障碍(MCI, n = 185)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评价MoCA分值对MCI患者进行分类的能力。结果:标准MoCA截点25/26的灵敏度为88%,特异性为51%,假阳性率为20%。ROC分析显示,MoCA截止值为24/25,在敏感性(81%)和特异性(62%)之间取得了更好的平衡,假阳性率较低,为16%。NTB结果显示,MCI组在视觉构建领域的标准参考百分位数得分最低,视觉构建领域是已知的阿尔茨海默病的早期特征,也是疾病快速进展的重要预测因素。结论:MoCA作为筛查≥65岁2型糖尿病患者的工具,即使采用较低的临界值,也高估了MCI的患病率。更具体的筛查策略是必要的,特别是针对视觉构建域,有效地识别个体认知障碍与2型糖尿病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a European cohort of elderly living with type 2 diabetes.

BackgroundIndividuals with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of developing both vascular and Alzheimer's dementia.ObjectiveThis prospective cross-sectional study assessed the screening ability of the standard Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score suggestive of mild cognitive impairment (<26) in a European cohort of individuals ≥65 of age with type 2 diabetes.MethodsParticipants of RECOGNISED, a European prospective EU-funded cohort study, were screened using MoCA. In addition, a 13-item Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB) with the Clinical Dementia Rating was undertaken to categorize participants as normocognitive (NC, n = 128) or mild cognitive impaired (MCI, n = 185). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the ability of MoCA cut-off scores to categorize patients as having MCI or not.ResultsThe standard MoCA cut-off of 25/26 demonstrated a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 51%, resulting in a false positive rate of 20%. ROC analysis showed that a MoCA cut-off of 24/25 has a better balance between sensitivity (81%) and specificity (62%), with a lower false positive rate of 16%. NTB results showed that the MCI group had the lowest norm-referenced percentile scores in the visuo-construction domain, a known early feature of Alzheimer's disease and a significant predictor of a rapid rate of disease progression.ConclusionsMoCA as a screening tool in individuals ≥65 with type 2 diabetes, overestimates the prevalence of MCI, even when applying lower cut-offs. More specific screening strategies are necessary, particularly targeting the visuo-construction domain, to effectively identify cognitive impairment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Offering and acceptance of plasma p-tau for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Results and insights from usual practice. Psychometric criteria for superior cognitive performance in very old adults. Maintenance of occupational therapy for individuals with dementia: Findings from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Associations of television viewing and computer use with cognitive performance in older adults: A cross-sectional NHANES study. Association of SORL1 polymorphisms and SORL1-APOE ε4 interaction with risk of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment in the Chinese population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1