IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-068673
Thomas J Reese, Andrew D Wiese, Ashley A Leech, Henry J Domenico, Elizabeth A McNeer, Sharon E Davis, Michael E Matheny, Adam Wright, Stephen W Patrick
{"title":"Adapting a Risk Prediction Tool for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.","authors":"Thomas J Reese, Andrew D Wiese, Ashley A Leech, Henry J Domenico, Elizabeth A McNeer, Sharon E Davis, Michael E Matheny, Adam Wright, Stephen W Patrick","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends up to 7 days of observation for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) in infants with chronic opioid exposure. However, many of these infants will not develop NOWS, and infants with seemingly less exposure to opioids may develop severe NOWS that requires in-hospital pharmacotherapy. We adapted and validated a prediction model to help clinicians identify infants at birth who will develop severe NOWS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prognostic study included 33 991 births. Severe NOWS was defined as administration of oral morphine. We applied logistic regression with a least absolute shrinkage selection operator approach to develop a severe NOWS prediction model using 37 predictors. To contrast the model with guideline screening criteria, we conducted a decision curve analysis with chronic opioid exposure defined as the mother receiving a diagnosis for opioid use disorder (OUD) or a prescription for long-acting opioids before delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 108 infants were treated with oral morphine for NOWS, and 1243 infants had chronic opioid exposure. The model was highly discriminative, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.959 (95% CI, 0.940-0.976). The strongest predictor was mothers' diagnoses of OUD (adjusted odds ratio, 47.0; 95% CI, 26.7-82.7). The decision curve analysis shows a higher benefit with the model across all levels of risk, compared with using the guideline criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk prediction for severe NOWS at birth may better support clinicians in tailoring nonpharmacologic measures and deciding whether to extend birth hospitalization than screening for chronic opioid exposure alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国儿科学会建议对长期暴露于阿片类药物的婴儿进行长达 7 天的新生儿阿片类药物戒断综合征(NOWS)观察。然而,这些婴儿中有许多不会出现 NOWS,而阿片类药物暴露似乎较少的婴儿可能会出现严重的 NOWS,需要进行院内药物治疗。我们改编并验证了一个预测模型,以帮助临床医生在婴儿出生时识别出会出现严重 NOWS 的婴儿:这项预后研究包括 33 991 名新生儿。重度 NOWS 的定义是口服吗啡。我们采用逻辑回归和最小绝对缩减选择算子方法,利用 37 个预测因子建立了严重 NOWS 预测模型。为了将该模型与指南筛选标准进行对比,我们进行了一项决策曲线分析,将长期阿片类药物暴露定义为母亲在分娩前接受阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)诊断或开具长效阿片类药物处方:共有108名婴儿因NOWS接受了口服吗啡治疗,1243名婴儿有长期阿片类药物暴露。该模型具有很高的区分度,接收器工作曲线下面积为 0.959(95% CI,0.940-0.976)。最强的预测因子是母亲的 OUD 诊断(调整后的几率比为 47.0;95% CI 为 26.7-82.7)。决策曲线分析表明,与使用指南标准相比,该模型在所有风险水平上的收益都更高:结论:与单独筛查慢性阿片类药物暴露相比,出生时严重NOWS的风险预测能更好地帮助临床医生定制非药物治疗措施,并决定是否延长出生时的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adapting a Risk Prediction Tool for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.

Background: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends up to 7 days of observation for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) in infants with chronic opioid exposure. However, many of these infants will not develop NOWS, and infants with seemingly less exposure to opioids may develop severe NOWS that requires in-hospital pharmacotherapy. We adapted and validated a prediction model to help clinicians identify infants at birth who will develop severe NOWS.

Methods: This prognostic study included 33 991 births. Severe NOWS was defined as administration of oral morphine. We applied logistic regression with a least absolute shrinkage selection operator approach to develop a severe NOWS prediction model using 37 predictors. To contrast the model with guideline screening criteria, we conducted a decision curve analysis with chronic opioid exposure defined as the mother receiving a diagnosis for opioid use disorder (OUD) or a prescription for long-acting opioids before delivery.

Results: A total of 108 infants were treated with oral morphine for NOWS, and 1243 infants had chronic opioid exposure. The model was highly discriminative, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.959 (95% CI, 0.940-0.976). The strongest predictor was mothers' diagnoses of OUD (adjusted odds ratio, 47.0; 95% CI, 26.7-82.7). The decision curve analysis shows a higher benefit with the model across all levels of risk, compared with using the guideline criteria.

Conclusion: Risk prediction for severe NOWS at birth may better support clinicians in tailoring nonpharmacologic measures and deciding whether to extend birth hospitalization than screening for chronic opioid exposure alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Infant Gross Motor Performance With an At-Home Wearable. Remote Assessment of Pediatric Anthropometrics. Family Navigation Programs for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review. Germline Genetic Variant Classification Requires More Equitable Reference Database Representation. Birth Prevalence of Gastroschisis in the United States: 2016-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1