花生过敏儿童表皮免疫治疗的长期安全性:一种开放标签的积极治疗(realize研究)。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.02.024
Jacqueline A. Pongracic MD , Rémi Gagnon MD, FRCPC , Gordon Sussman MD, FRCPC , Dareen Siri MD , Roxanne C. Oriel MD , Terri F. Brown-Whitehorn MD , Sara Anvari MD, MS , William E. Berger MD , J. Andrew Bird MD , Edmond S. Chan MD , R. Sharon Chinthrajah MD , Hey J. Chong MD, PhD , Stanley M. Fineman MD , David M. Fleischer MD , Erika Gonzalez-Reyes MD , Edwin H. Kim MD, MS , Bruce J. Lanser MD, MPH , Andrew MacGinnitie MD, PhD , Hemalini Mehta MD , Daniel Petroni MD, PhD , Philippe Bégin MD, PhD
{"title":"花生过敏儿童表皮免疫治疗的长期安全性:一种开放标签的积极治疗(realize研究)。","authors":"Jacqueline A. Pongracic MD ,&nbsp;Rémi Gagnon MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Gordon Sussman MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Dareen Siri MD ,&nbsp;Roxanne C. Oriel MD ,&nbsp;Terri F. Brown-Whitehorn MD ,&nbsp;Sara Anvari MD, MS ,&nbsp;William E. Berger MD ,&nbsp;J. Andrew Bird MD ,&nbsp;Edmond S. Chan MD ,&nbsp;R. Sharon Chinthrajah MD ,&nbsp;Hey J. Chong MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stanley M. Fineman MD ,&nbsp;David M. Fleischer MD ,&nbsp;Erika Gonzalez-Reyes MD ,&nbsp;Edwin H. Kim MD, MS ,&nbsp;Bruce J. Lanser MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Andrew MacGinnitie MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hemalini Mehta MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Petroni MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Philippe Bégin MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.02.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Owing to limited treatment options for peanut allergy, patients remain at risk for allergic reactions due to accidental exposure. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) is a novel treatment being investigated for peanut allergy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study assessed long-term safety of EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg (VP250) via an open-label extension of the REAL Life Use and Safety of EPIT (REALISE) trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>REALISE was a phase 3 trial in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years that included a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, followed by an open-label, single-arm, active treatment period for up to 36 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 392 participants (male 54.8%; median age 7.2 y) who received at least 1 dose of treatment, 77.8% completed the 36-month active treatment. Mean adherence to treatment was high at 96.4%. Most participants (98.7%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); the majority were mild or moderate and decreased in frequency and severity over time. Most participants (94.6%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related TEAE. Local skin reactions were the most common treatment-related TEAE with the incidence decreasing from year 1 (87.8%) to year 3 (19.2%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in 2 participants. No specific safety signals were identified in the 14 participants enrolled with a history of severe anaphylaxis (Anaphylaxis Staging System grade 3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Consistent with previous phase 3 studies, long-term EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg was well tolerated with high adherence in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years (<span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; NCT: <span><span>NCT02916446</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 5","pages":"Pages 1190-1200.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Children: An Open-Label Active Treatment (REALISE Study)\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline A. Pongracic MD ,&nbsp;Rémi Gagnon MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Gordon Sussman MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Dareen Siri MD ,&nbsp;Roxanne C. Oriel MD ,&nbsp;Terri F. Brown-Whitehorn MD ,&nbsp;Sara Anvari MD, MS ,&nbsp;William E. Berger MD ,&nbsp;J. Andrew Bird MD ,&nbsp;Edmond S. Chan MD ,&nbsp;R. Sharon Chinthrajah MD ,&nbsp;Hey J. Chong MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stanley M. Fineman MD ,&nbsp;David M. Fleischer MD ,&nbsp;Erika Gonzalez-Reyes MD ,&nbsp;Edwin H. Kim MD, MS ,&nbsp;Bruce J. Lanser MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Andrew MacGinnitie MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hemalini Mehta MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Petroni MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Philippe Bégin MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.02.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Owing to limited treatment options for peanut allergy, patients remain at risk for allergic reactions due to accidental exposure. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) is a novel treatment being investigated for peanut allergy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study assessed long-term safety of EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg (VP250) via an open-label extension of the REAL Life Use and Safety of EPIT (REALISE) trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>REALISE was a phase 3 trial in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years that included a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, followed by an open-label, single-arm, active treatment period for up to 36 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 392 participants (male 54.8%; median age 7.2 y) who received at least 1 dose of treatment, 77.8% completed the 36-month active treatment. Mean adherence to treatment was high at 96.4%. Most participants (98.7%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); the majority were mild or moderate and decreased in frequency and severity over time. Most participants (94.6%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related TEAE. Local skin reactions were the most common treatment-related TEAE with the incidence decreasing from year 1 (87.8%) to year 3 (19.2%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in 2 participants. No specific safety signals were identified in the 14 participants enrolled with a history of severe anaphylaxis (Anaphylaxis Staging System grade 3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Consistent with previous phase 3 studies, long-term EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg was well tolerated with high adherence in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years (<span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; NCT: <span><span>NCT02916446</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1190-1200.e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219825001965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219825001965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于花生过敏的治疗选择有限,患者仍然存在因意外接触而发生过敏反应的风险。表皮免疫疗法(EPIT)是一种新的花生过敏治疗方法。目的:本研究通过开放标签扩展EPIT的现实生活使用和安全性(aware)试验,评估了VIASKIN®花生贴片250 μg (VP250)与EPIT的长期安全性。方法:aware是一项针对4至11岁花生过敏儿童的3期试验,包括6个月的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照治疗期,随后是一个开放标签、单臂、长达36个月的积极治疗期。结果:在392名参与者中(男性54.8%;接受至少1剂治疗的患者中位年龄为7.2岁,77.8%的患者完成了36个月的积极治疗。平均治疗依从性高达96.4%。大多数参与者(98.7%)至少经历了一次治疗出现的不良事件(TEAE);大多数是轻度或中度,随着时间的推移,频率和严重程度有所下降。大多数(94.6%)参与者经历了至少1次与治疗相关的TEAE。局部皮肤反应是最常见的治疗相关TEAE,发病率从第1年(87.8%)到第3年(19.2%)下降。2名参与者报告了严重的治疗相关teae。结论:与之前的3期研究一致,长期EPIT与VP250在4至11岁花生过敏儿童中具有良好的耐受性和高依从性(clinicaltrials.gov;NCT: NCT02916446)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Children: An Open-Label Active Treatment (REALISE Study)

Background

Owing to limited treatment options for peanut allergy, patients remain at risk for allergic reactions due to accidental exposure. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) is a novel treatment being investigated for peanut allergy.

Objective

This study assessed long-term safety of EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg (VP250) via an open-label extension of the REAL Life Use and Safety of EPIT (REALISE) trial.

Methods

REALISE was a phase 3 trial in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years that included a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, followed by an open-label, single-arm, active treatment period for up to 36 months.

Results

Of the 392 participants (male 54.8%; median age 7.2 y) who received at least 1 dose of treatment, 77.8% completed the 36-month active treatment. Mean adherence to treatment was high at 96.4%. Most participants (98.7%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); the majority were mild or moderate and decreased in frequency and severity over time. Most participants (94.6%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related TEAE. Local skin reactions were the most common treatment-related TEAE with the incidence decreasing from year 1 (87.8%) to year 3 (19.2%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in 2 participants. No specific safety signals were identified in the 14 participants enrolled with a history of severe anaphylaxis (Anaphylaxis Staging System grade 3).

Conclusion

Consistent with previous phase 3 studies, long-term EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg was well tolerated with high adherence in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT: NCT02916446).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
From Non-IgE Mediated Cow's Milk Allergy to Rickets: Consequences of Unwarranted Dairy Exclusion. Social Determinants of Health in Newly Diagnosed Hereditary Angioedema and Their Impact on Healthcare Resource Utilization Outcomes. More than a Drink: The Behavioral Impact of Alcohol Sensitivity in AERD. Estimating work-related indirect costs in allergic rhinitis and asthma using a daily combined symptom-medication score: a MASK-air® study in collaboration with the EAACI Methodology Committee. Stability of epinephrine nasal spray under room temperature, freeze-thaw, and extreme temperature conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1