单侧双门静脉内窥镜下对侧减压治疗腰椎椎体间融合术后邻近节段狭窄的安全性和实用性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001777
Dong Hyun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee
{"title":"单侧双门静脉内窥镜下对侧减压治疗腰椎椎体间融合术后邻近节段狭窄的安全性和实用性。","authors":"Dong Hyun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral-contralateral decompression using unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for treating adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>ASD is a well-documented complication following LIF, often requiring additional surgical interventions. Traditional decompression techniques risk damaging the facet joints, potentially leading to further instability and degeneration. However, our bilateral-contralateral decompression using UBE focuses on minimizing facet joint resection and reducing the risk of postoperative instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 37 patients who underwent bilateral-contralateral UBE decompression for ASD following LIF at the L4-5 level between September 2020 and March 2022. Radiographic evaluations included measurements of vertebral range of motion (ROM), slip distance, disk height, lumbar lordosis, and facet joint preservation. Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average final follow-up period was 14.5±1.9 mo. The average preoperative ROM was 3.0 degrees, which significantly increased to 4.8° at the final follow-up ( P <0.05). Static structure and dynamic stability parameters, including the vertebral slip distance, lumbar lordosis, and disk height, showed no significant differences between the preoperative examination and 1-year postoperative follow-up. The facet joint preservation rate was 97.4±2.1% on average. Significant improvements in VAS scores for leg and back pain and ODI were observed. Despite improvement with conservative treatment in 7 patients with delayed instability, 2 patients required fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral-contralateral decompression through UBE has proven to be an effective and safe method for treating ASD following LIF. This technique is particularly suitable for patients requiring spinal stability maintenance. The high rates of facet joint preservation and low incidence of reoperation highlight this technique as a compelling alternative treatment for spinal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E488-E498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12655872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Utility of Bilateral-contralateral Decompression for Adjacent Segment Stenosis After Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Hyun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral-contralateral decompression using unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for treating adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>ASD is a well-documented complication following LIF, often requiring additional surgical interventions. Traditional decompression techniques risk damaging the facet joints, potentially leading to further instability and degeneration. However, our bilateral-contralateral decompression using UBE focuses on minimizing facet joint resection and reducing the risk of postoperative instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 37 patients who underwent bilateral-contralateral UBE decompression for ASD following LIF at the L4-5 level between September 2020 and March 2022. Radiographic evaluations included measurements of vertebral range of motion (ROM), slip distance, disk height, lumbar lordosis, and facet joint preservation. Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average final follow-up period was 14.5±1.9 mo. The average preoperative ROM was 3.0 degrees, which significantly increased to 4.8° at the final follow-up ( P <0.05). Static structure and dynamic stability parameters, including the vertebral slip distance, lumbar lordosis, and disk height, showed no significant differences between the preoperative examination and 1-year postoperative follow-up. The facet joint preservation rate was 97.4±2.1% on average. Significant improvements in VAS scores for leg and back pain and ODI were observed. Despite improvement with conservative treatment in 7 patients with delayed instability, 2 patients required fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral-contralateral decompression through UBE has proven to be an effective and safe method for treating ASD following LIF. This technique is particularly suitable for patients requiring spinal stability maintenance. The high rates of facet joint preservation and low incidence of reoperation highlight this technique as a compelling alternative treatment for spinal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E488-E498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12655872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001777\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性病例系列研究。目的:评价单侧双门静脉内镜(UBE)下双对侧减压治疗腰椎椎体间融合术(LIF)后临近节段疾病(ASD)的安全性和有效性。背景资料总结:ASD是LIF后的并发症,通常需要额外的手术干预。传统的减压技术有损伤小关节的风险,可能导致进一步的不稳定和退变。然而,我们使用UBE的双侧-对侧减压侧重于最小化小关节切除术和降低术后不稳定的风险。方法:本研究包括37例患者,他们在2020年9月至2022年3月期间在L4-5水平的LIF后接受了双侧-对侧UBE减压治疗ASD。影像学评估包括测量椎体活动度(ROM)、滑动距离、椎间盘高度、腰椎前凸和小关节保存情况。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评定背部和腿部疼痛及Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)进行临床评估。结果:最终随访时间平均为14.5±1.9个月,术前平均ROM为3.0°,最终随访时ROM明显增加至4.8°(p)结论:经UBE双侧-对侧减压治疗LIF后ASD是一种有效且安全的方法。这项技术特别适用于需要维持脊柱稳定性的患者。小关节保留率高,再手术发生率低,突出了该技术作为椎管狭窄的一种令人信服的替代治疗方法。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and Utility of Bilateral-contralateral Decompression for Adjacent Segment Stenosis After Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy.

Study design: Retrospective case series study.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral-contralateral decompression using unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for treating adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF).

Summary of background data: ASD is a well-documented complication following LIF, often requiring additional surgical interventions. Traditional decompression techniques risk damaging the facet joints, potentially leading to further instability and degeneration. However, our bilateral-contralateral decompression using UBE focuses on minimizing facet joint resection and reducing the risk of postoperative instability.

Methods: This study included 37 patients who underwent bilateral-contralateral UBE decompression for ASD following LIF at the L4-5 level between September 2020 and March 2022. Radiographic evaluations included measurements of vertebral range of motion (ROM), slip distance, disk height, lumbar lordosis, and facet joint preservation. Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI).

Results: The average final follow-up period was 14.5±1.9 mo. The average preoperative ROM was 3.0 degrees, which significantly increased to 4.8° at the final follow-up ( P <0.05). Static structure and dynamic stability parameters, including the vertebral slip distance, lumbar lordosis, and disk height, showed no significant differences between the preoperative examination and 1-year postoperative follow-up. The facet joint preservation rate was 97.4±2.1% on average. Significant improvements in VAS scores for leg and back pain and ODI were observed. Despite improvement with conservative treatment in 7 patients with delayed instability, 2 patients required fusion surgery.

Conclusions: Bilateral-contralateral decompression through UBE has proven to be an effective and safe method for treating ASD following LIF. This technique is particularly suitable for patients requiring spinal stability maintenance. The high rates of facet joint preservation and low incidence of reoperation highlight this technique as a compelling alternative treatment for spinal stenosis.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Demographic and Microorganism Differences Between De Novo and Postoperative Infections. Twelve-Month Comparative Efficacy of Lumbar Fusion and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. A Surgical Technique Guide for C1-2 Fixation By the Cervical Spine Research Society. Implant Migration After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review. Postoperative Footdrop Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Associated Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1