印度分娩硬膜外试验剂量实践调查。

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_353_23
Divya Jain, Komal Gandhi, Medha Gupta, Kajal Jain, Ishwar Bhukal
{"title":"印度分娩硬膜外试验剂量实践调查。","authors":"Divya Jain, Komal Gandhi, Medha Gupta, Kajal Jain, Ishwar Bhukal","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_353_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a lack of consensus and uniformity about the test dose in epidurals for labor analgesia. We, therefore, conducted a questionnaire-based survey to assess the current practice in India regarding test-dose for labor epidurals among practicing obstetric anesthetists. A Google form based questionnaire was circulated to 300 members of the Association of Obstetric Anesthesiologists (AOA) of India of which 128 (42.7%) responded. According to our survey, labor analgesia is routinely practiced by only 40 (32%) responders. Sixty-eight (53.1%) responders reported placement of an epidural catheter at the patient's request. Less than 50% reported the use of test dose for epidural catheter placement confirmation. Ninety-eight (76.6%) responders give the test dose at the time of catheter placement while 22 (17.1%) give it every time before injecting the local anesthetic as a top-up. The majority preferred using 3-4 mL of 2% lidocaine as test dose. Seventy-three (57%) responders relied on the use of conventional test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine. 8.5% of responders had experienced side effects with epidural test dose during labor analgesia. This survey highlights not just variations in the clinical practice regarding epidural test dose for labor analgesia but gross deviation from the current recommended standard of practice. The issue can be addressed by developing clear practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 1","pages":"189-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on labor epidural test dose practices in India.\",\"authors\":\"Divya Jain, Komal Gandhi, Medha Gupta, Kajal Jain, Ishwar Bhukal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_353_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a lack of consensus and uniformity about the test dose in epidurals for labor analgesia. We, therefore, conducted a questionnaire-based survey to assess the current practice in India regarding test-dose for labor epidurals among practicing obstetric anesthetists. A Google form based questionnaire was circulated to 300 members of the Association of Obstetric Anesthesiologists (AOA) of India of which 128 (42.7%) responded. According to our survey, labor analgesia is routinely practiced by only 40 (32%) responders. Sixty-eight (53.1%) responders reported placement of an epidural catheter at the patient's request. Less than 50% reported the use of test dose for epidural catheter placement confirmation. Ninety-eight (76.6%) responders give the test dose at the time of catheter placement while 22 (17.1%) give it every time before injecting the local anesthetic as a top-up. The majority preferred using 3-4 mL of 2% lidocaine as test dose. Seventy-three (57%) responders relied on the use of conventional test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine. 8.5% of responders had experienced side effects with epidural test dose during labor analgesia. This survey highlights not just variations in the clinical practice regarding epidural test dose for labor analgesia but gross deviation from the current recommended standard of practice. The issue can be addressed by developing clear practice guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"189-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_353_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_353_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于硬膜外分娩镇痛的试验剂量缺乏共识和一致性。因此,我们进行了一项基于问卷的调查,以评估目前在印度实践产科麻醉师中关于硬膜外分娩试验剂量的做法。向印度产科麻醉师协会(AOA)的300名成员分发了一份谷歌形式的问卷,其中128名(42.7%)做出了回应。根据我们的调查,只有40名(32%)应答者常规使用分娩镇痛。68名应答者(53.1%)报告应患者要求放置硬膜外导管。不到50%的报告使用试验剂量来确认硬膜外导管的放置。98例(76.6%)应答者在置管时给予试验剂量,22例(17.1%)应答者在每次注射局麻药前给予试验剂量作为补充。大多数人倾向于使用3-4毫升2%利多卡因作为试验剂量。73例(57%)应答者依赖于常规试验剂量利多卡因与肾上腺素的联合使用。8.5%的应答者在分娩镇痛时出现硬膜外试验剂量的副作用。这项调查不仅突出了临床实践中关于分娩镇痛的硬膜外试验剂量的变化,而且与目前推荐的实践标准有很大的偏差。这个问题可以通过制定明确的实践指导方针来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey on labor epidural test dose practices in India.

There is a lack of consensus and uniformity about the test dose in epidurals for labor analgesia. We, therefore, conducted a questionnaire-based survey to assess the current practice in India regarding test-dose for labor epidurals among practicing obstetric anesthetists. A Google form based questionnaire was circulated to 300 members of the Association of Obstetric Anesthesiologists (AOA) of India of which 128 (42.7%) responded. According to our survey, labor analgesia is routinely practiced by only 40 (32%) responders. Sixty-eight (53.1%) responders reported placement of an epidural catheter at the patient's request. Less than 50% reported the use of test dose for epidural catheter placement confirmation. Ninety-eight (76.6%) responders give the test dose at the time of catheter placement while 22 (17.1%) give it every time before injecting the local anesthetic as a top-up. The majority preferred using 3-4 mL of 2% lidocaine as test dose. Seventy-three (57%) responders relied on the use of conventional test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine. 8.5% of responders had experienced side effects with epidural test dose during labor analgesia. This survey highlights not just variations in the clinical practice regarding epidural test dose for labor analgesia but gross deviation from the current recommended standard of practice. The issue can be addressed by developing clear practice guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
期刊最新文献
Bronchoscopic removal of bronchial carcinoid tumors: Case series and literature review. Comparing continuous bilateral quadratus lumborum block with continuous epidural block for analgesia and perioperative outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Comparison of fiberoptic-guided success of intubation using intubating LMA and intubating laryngeal tube suction. Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided single-level thoracic paravertebral block and complete antethoracic block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Etomidate is a potential medical option in the management of severe and refractory Cushing's syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1