极限状态下GFRP吸斗在粘土中的性能

IF 6.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Thin-Walled Structures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.tws.2025.113139
Zhao-tun An, Hai-lei Kou, Yan Sun, Yan-sheng Wang, Xi-xin Zhang, Jia-qing Lu, Guang-yuan Ma
{"title":"极限状态下GFRP吸斗在粘土中的性能","authors":"Zhao-tun An,&nbsp;Hai-lei Kou,&nbsp;Yan Sun,&nbsp;Yan-sheng Wang,&nbsp;Xi-xin Zhang,&nbsp;Jia-qing Lu,&nbsp;Guang-yuan Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Suction buckets fabricated from glass fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP) have emerged as alternatives to conventional steel bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines. Numerical models incorporating a GFRP damage degradation model were developed to investigate the structural response of three critical GFRP bucket sections (S1: top transition, S2: mid-skirt, S3: bottom edge) under ultimate limit states. The results indicate that mechanical changes of the bucket skirt in section S1 are minimized, while the response of section S3 is maximized under different fibre orientations (<em>f</em>) and wall thicknesses (<em>t</em>). The maximum principal stress is minimized for <em>f</em> = 45°. The maximum deformation and ellipticity of the bucket skirt are 27 mm and 0.57 %, respectively, across different fibre orientations. The maximum principal stress and maximum circumferential strain show an obvious decreasing trend as the skirt wall thickness increases. When <em>t</em> ≥ 0.6 %<em>D</em>, the gap between the stresses and strains in each section of the bucket skirt decreases significantly. For varying wall thicknesses of the bucket foundation, the maximum deformation of section S3 are approximately 5.5 times that of sections S1. When the target reliabilities are 3.71, 4.26, and 4.75, the corresponding wall thicknesses of the bucket foundations are 0.259 %<em>D</em>, 0.265 %<em>D</em>, and 0.275 %<em>D</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 113139"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavior of GFRP suction bucket in clay under ultimate limit state\",\"authors\":\"Zhao-tun An,&nbsp;Hai-lei Kou,&nbsp;Yan Sun,&nbsp;Yan-sheng Wang,&nbsp;Xi-xin Zhang,&nbsp;Jia-qing Lu,&nbsp;Guang-yuan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Suction buckets fabricated from glass fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP) have emerged as alternatives to conventional steel bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines. Numerical models incorporating a GFRP damage degradation model were developed to investigate the structural response of three critical GFRP bucket sections (S1: top transition, S2: mid-skirt, S3: bottom edge) under ultimate limit states. The results indicate that mechanical changes of the bucket skirt in section S1 are minimized, while the response of section S3 is maximized under different fibre orientations (<em>f</em>) and wall thicknesses (<em>t</em>). The maximum principal stress is minimized for <em>f</em> = 45°. The maximum deformation and ellipticity of the bucket skirt are 27 mm and 0.57 %, respectively, across different fibre orientations. The maximum principal stress and maximum circumferential strain show an obvious decreasing trend as the skirt wall thickness increases. When <em>t</em> ≥ 0.6 %<em>D</em>, the gap between the stresses and strains in each section of the bucket skirt decreases significantly. For varying wall thicknesses of the bucket foundation, the maximum deformation of section S3 are approximately 5.5 times that of sections S1. When the target reliabilities are 3.71, 4.26, and 4.75, the corresponding wall thicknesses of the bucket foundations are 0.259 %<em>D</em>, 0.265 %<em>D</em>, and 0.275 %<em>D</em>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"volume\":\"211 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823125002332\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823125002332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)制成的吸桶已经成为海上风力涡轮机传统钢桶基础的替代品。建立了基于GFRP损伤退化模型的数值模型,研究了GFRP桶形结构在极限状态下的结构响应(S1:顶部过渡,S2:中裙边,S3:底边)。结果表明:在不同纤维取向(f)和壁厚(t)下,S1截面桶裙的力学变化最小,而S3截面的响应最大,f = 45°时最大主应力最小;在不同纤维取向下,桶裙的最大变形量为27 mm,椭圆率为0.57%。随着裙壁厚度的增加,最大主应力和最大周向应变呈明显的减小趋势。当t≥0.6% D时,桶裙各截面应力应变差显著减小。对于不同壁厚的桶形基础,截面S3的最大变形量约为截面S1的5.5倍。当目标可靠度分别为3.71、4.26和4.75时,相应的桶形基础壁厚分别为0.259 %D、0.265 %D和0.275 %D。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behavior of GFRP suction bucket in clay under ultimate limit state
Suction buckets fabricated from glass fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP) have emerged as alternatives to conventional steel bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines. Numerical models incorporating a GFRP damage degradation model were developed to investigate the structural response of three critical GFRP bucket sections (S1: top transition, S2: mid-skirt, S3: bottom edge) under ultimate limit states. The results indicate that mechanical changes of the bucket skirt in section S1 are minimized, while the response of section S3 is maximized under different fibre orientations (f) and wall thicknesses (t). The maximum principal stress is minimized for f = 45°. The maximum deformation and ellipticity of the bucket skirt are 27 mm and 0.57 %, respectively, across different fibre orientations. The maximum principal stress and maximum circumferential strain show an obvious decreasing trend as the skirt wall thickness increases. When t ≥ 0.6 %D, the gap between the stresses and strains in each section of the bucket skirt decreases significantly. For varying wall thicknesses of the bucket foundation, the maximum deformation of section S3 are approximately 5.5 times that of sections S1. When the target reliabilities are 3.71, 4.26, and 4.75, the corresponding wall thicknesses of the bucket foundations are 0.259 %D, 0.265 %D, and 0.275 %D.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
期刊最新文献
A novel dynamic modeling approach for hyper-elastic shells with variable thickness Self-oscillation of a thin-walled cantilever enabled by a minimal liquid crystal elastomer switching actuator Inertial amplification and negative stiffness in a frame-based metamaterial for low-frequency vibration attenuation Compliant steel-based negative stiffness-embedded tuned liquid damper for resilient seismic protection of isolated structures Phenomenological modeling of galvannealed coating flaking under various deformation modes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1