Bradley M Appelhans, Simone A French, Molly A Martin, Karen J Lui, Lauren E Bradley, Tricia J Johnson, Heng Wang, Imke Janssen, Sumihiro Suzuki
{"title":"低收入家庭家庭分娩儿童体重管理:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Bradley M Appelhans, Simone A French, Molly A Martin, Karen J Lui, Lauren E Bradley, Tricia J Johnson, Heng Wang, Imke Janssen, Sumihiro Suzuki","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-069282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Children from lower-income households lose less weight in family-based weight management interventions, likely due to barriers to treatment attendance and adherence. The CHECK randomized controlled trial tested whether delivering pediatric weight management interventions in the home improves weight loss outcomes relative to clinic-delivered intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enrolled families included 269 children (137 boys) who were aged 6 to 12 years, had overweight/obesity, and lived in lower-income English- or Spanish-speaking households in Chicago, Illinois (2017-2022). All families received a 12-month pediatric weight management intervention with 18 planned in-person sessions and 12 planned telephone contacts. The sole difference between arms was the location (home vs clinic) of in-person intervention sessions. Intention-to-treat analyses compared treatment arms on 12-month change in BMI z-score (zBMI), intervention session attendance and contact time, and secondary clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve-month zBMI change did not differ (P = .58) between the home-delivered (n = 133; -0.031, SD = 0.26) and clinic-delivered arms (n = 136; -0.002, SD = 0.30). Across both arms, session attendance and total contact time predicted larger decreases in zBMI. Both variables were higher in the home-delivered arm (median = 11 sessions, 500 minutes) than the clinic-delivered arm (median = 6.5 sessions, 315.5 minutes; P values < .001). Post hoc analyses indicated that home-delivered (vs clinic-delivered) intervention led to 0.03 (SE = 0.008, P = .0004) greater zBMI reductions across time points prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but not after.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home delivery did not improve overall 12-month weight loss outcomes. Home-delivered intervention did increase session attendance and contact time and may have had beneficial weight loss effects prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-Delivered Pediatric Weight Management for Low-Income Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Bradley M Appelhans, Simone A French, Molly A Martin, Karen J Lui, Lauren E Bradley, Tricia J Johnson, Heng Wang, Imke Janssen, Sumihiro Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-069282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Children from lower-income households lose less weight in family-based weight management interventions, likely due to barriers to treatment attendance and adherence. The CHECK randomized controlled trial tested whether delivering pediatric weight management interventions in the home improves weight loss outcomes relative to clinic-delivered intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enrolled families included 269 children (137 boys) who were aged 6 to 12 years, had overweight/obesity, and lived in lower-income English- or Spanish-speaking households in Chicago, Illinois (2017-2022). All families received a 12-month pediatric weight management intervention with 18 planned in-person sessions and 12 planned telephone contacts. The sole difference between arms was the location (home vs clinic) of in-person intervention sessions. Intention-to-treat analyses compared treatment arms on 12-month change in BMI z-score (zBMI), intervention session attendance and contact time, and secondary clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve-month zBMI change did not differ (P = .58) between the home-delivered (n = 133; -0.031, SD = 0.26) and clinic-delivered arms (n = 136; -0.002, SD = 0.30). Across both arms, session attendance and total contact time predicted larger decreases in zBMI. Both variables were higher in the home-delivered arm (median = 11 sessions, 500 minutes) than the clinic-delivered arm (median = 6.5 sessions, 315.5 minutes; P values < .001). Post hoc analyses indicated that home-delivered (vs clinic-delivered) intervention led to 0.03 (SE = 0.008, P = .0004) greater zBMI reductions across time points prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but not after.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home delivery did not improve overall 12-month weight loss outcomes. Home-delivered intervention did increase session attendance and contact time and may have had beneficial weight loss effects prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-069282\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-069282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Home-Delivered Pediatric Weight Management for Low-Income Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background and objectives: Children from lower-income households lose less weight in family-based weight management interventions, likely due to barriers to treatment attendance and adherence. The CHECK randomized controlled trial tested whether delivering pediatric weight management interventions in the home improves weight loss outcomes relative to clinic-delivered intervention.
Methods: Enrolled families included 269 children (137 boys) who were aged 6 to 12 years, had overweight/obesity, and lived in lower-income English- or Spanish-speaking households in Chicago, Illinois (2017-2022). All families received a 12-month pediatric weight management intervention with 18 planned in-person sessions and 12 planned telephone contacts. The sole difference between arms was the location (home vs clinic) of in-person intervention sessions. Intention-to-treat analyses compared treatment arms on 12-month change in BMI z-score (zBMI), intervention session attendance and contact time, and secondary clinical outcomes.
Results: Twelve-month zBMI change did not differ (P = .58) between the home-delivered (n = 133; -0.031, SD = 0.26) and clinic-delivered arms (n = 136; -0.002, SD = 0.30). Across both arms, session attendance and total contact time predicted larger decreases in zBMI. Both variables were higher in the home-delivered arm (median = 11 sessions, 500 minutes) than the clinic-delivered arm (median = 6.5 sessions, 315.5 minutes; P values < .001). Post hoc analyses indicated that home-delivered (vs clinic-delivered) intervention led to 0.03 (SE = 0.008, P = .0004) greater zBMI reductions across time points prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but not after.
Conclusions: Home delivery did not improve overall 12-month weight loss outcomes. Home-delivered intervention did increase session attendance and contact time and may have had beneficial weight loss effects prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.