癌症患者护理营养模式的核心要素和原则:范围综述

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2025.02.030
J. Loeliger , A. Ugalde , J. Porter , N. Kiss
{"title":"癌症患者护理营养模式的核心要素和原则:范围综述","authors":"J. Loeliger ,&nbsp;A. Ugalde ,&nbsp;J. Porter ,&nbsp;N. Kiss","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>The development and implementation of evidence-based cancer nutrition models of care into clinical practice is challenging and pragmatic guidance is lacking. This scoping review aimed to identify the core elements and principles of nutrition models of care for people with cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL and Embase were systematically searched between 1 January 2003–8 November 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion and data extraction if they reported on the implementation or evaluation of a nutrition model of care for adults with any cancer diagnosis. The protocol was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (<span><span>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RQVHJ</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) on 7 November 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search identified 4599 papers, 28 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were primarily conducted in Australia (71.4 %), within a hospital (96.4 %), metropolitan setting (89.3 %) and with various cancer diagnoses. Most studies described a nutrition screening process and 50 % used a valid and reliable assessment tool. Studies described provision of direct care by the dietitian (n = 26), primarily conducted in the outpatient setting (n = 26) and lesser in the inpatient setting (n = 12), and frequently face-to-face (n = 25) [phone (n = 14), telehealth (n = 3)]. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned the models of care including: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic (100.0 %); nutrition expertise and leadership (100.0 %); flexible and integrated (100.0 %); with multi-directional communication (96.4 %); accessible (92.9 %); stratified by risk (89.3 %); multidisciplinary engagement (85.7 %); across different care time-points and settings (85.7 %); supported by training/education (50.0 %) and data integration (25.0 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nutrition expert-led cancer nutrition models of care literature was primarily limited to metropolitan, hospital settings and many lacked valid nutrition assessment tools. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned nutrition care, with the most utilised being: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic; nutrition expert-led; flexible and integrated; with multi-directional communication; accessible; and stratified by risk. There is great potential for an evidence-based model of nutrition care to improve the implementation and embedding of high-quality nutrition elements into the cancer pathway.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"47 ","pages":"Pages 227-241"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Core elements and principles of nutrition models of care for people with cancer: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"J. Loeliger ,&nbsp;A. Ugalde ,&nbsp;J. Porter ,&nbsp;N. Kiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.02.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>The development and implementation of evidence-based cancer nutrition models of care into clinical practice is challenging and pragmatic guidance is lacking. This scoping review aimed to identify the core elements and principles of nutrition models of care for people with cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL and Embase were systematically searched between 1 January 2003–8 November 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion and data extraction if they reported on the implementation or evaluation of a nutrition model of care for adults with any cancer diagnosis. The protocol was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (<span><span>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RQVHJ</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) on 7 November 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search identified 4599 papers, 28 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were primarily conducted in Australia (71.4 %), within a hospital (96.4 %), metropolitan setting (89.3 %) and with various cancer diagnoses. Most studies described a nutrition screening process and 50 % used a valid and reliable assessment tool. Studies described provision of direct care by the dietitian (n = 26), primarily conducted in the outpatient setting (n = 26) and lesser in the inpatient setting (n = 12), and frequently face-to-face (n = 25) [phone (n = 14), telehealth (n = 3)]. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned the models of care including: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic (100.0 %); nutrition expertise and leadership (100.0 %); flexible and integrated (100.0 %); with multi-directional communication (96.4 %); accessible (92.9 %); stratified by risk (89.3 %); multidisciplinary engagement (85.7 %); across different care time-points and settings (85.7 %); supported by training/education (50.0 %) and data integration (25.0 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nutrition expert-led cancer nutrition models of care literature was primarily limited to metropolitan, hospital settings and many lacked valid nutrition assessment tools. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned nutrition care, with the most utilised being: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic; nutrition expert-led; flexible and integrated; with multi-directional communication; accessible; and stratified by risk. There is great potential for an evidence-based model of nutrition care to improve the implementation and embedding of high-quality nutrition elements into the cancer pathway.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 227-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425000652\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425000652","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的基于证据的癌症营养护理模式在临床实践中的发展和实施具有挑战性,缺乏实用的指导。本综述旨在确定癌症患者护理营养模式的核心要素和原则。方法系统检索2003年1月1日至2023年11月8日期间的medline Complete、CINAHL和Embase。如果研究报告了对任何癌症诊断的成人护理的营养模型的实施或评估,则有资格纳入和提取数据。该方案已于2023年11月7日在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RQVHJ)上注册。结果共检索到4599篇论文,其中28篇符合纳入标准。研究主要在澳大利亚(71.4%)、医院(96.4%)、大都市环境(89.3%)和各种癌症诊断中进行。大多数研究描述了营养筛选过程,50%的研究使用了有效可靠的评估工具。研究描述了由营养师提供的直接护理(n = 26),主要在门诊(n = 26)进行,较少在住院(n = 12)进行,并且经常面对面(n = 25)[电话(n = 14),远程医疗(n = 3)]。确定了支持护理模式的10个核心要素,包括:由护理途径、方案或诊所驱动的及时护理(100.0%);营养专业知识和领导能力(100.0%);灵活和集成(100.0%);具有多向通信(96.4%);无障碍(92.9%);按风险分层(89.3%);多学科参与(85.7%);跨越不同护理时间点和环境(85.7%);由培训/教育(50.0%)和数据集成(25.0%)支持。结论文献中以营养专家为主导的癌症营养模型主要局限于大城市和医院,缺乏有效的营养评估工具。确定了支持营养护理的十个核心要素,其中使用率最高的是:由护理途径、方案或诊所驱动的及时护理;营养expert-led;灵活和集成;具有多向通信功能;访问;并按风险分层。以证据为基础的营养护理模式有很大的潜力,可以改善高质量营养元素在癌症途径中的实施和嵌入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Core elements and principles of nutrition models of care for people with cancer: A scoping review

Background and aims

The development and implementation of evidence-based cancer nutrition models of care into clinical practice is challenging and pragmatic guidance is lacking. This scoping review aimed to identify the core elements and principles of nutrition models of care for people with cancer.

Methods

MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL and Embase were systematically searched between 1 January 2003–8 November 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion and data extraction if they reported on the implementation or evaluation of a nutrition model of care for adults with any cancer diagnosis. The protocol was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RQVHJ) on 7 November 2023.

Results

The search identified 4599 papers, 28 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were primarily conducted in Australia (71.4 %), within a hospital (96.4 %), metropolitan setting (89.3 %) and with various cancer diagnoses. Most studies described a nutrition screening process and 50 % used a valid and reliable assessment tool. Studies described provision of direct care by the dietitian (n = 26), primarily conducted in the outpatient setting (n = 26) and lesser in the inpatient setting (n = 12), and frequently face-to-face (n = 25) [phone (n = 14), telehealth (n = 3)]. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned the models of care including: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic (100.0 %); nutrition expertise and leadership (100.0 %); flexible and integrated (100.0 %); with multi-directional communication (96.4 %); accessible (92.9 %); stratified by risk (89.3 %); multidisciplinary engagement (85.7 %); across different care time-points and settings (85.7 %); supported by training/education (50.0 %) and data integration (25.0 %).

Conclusions

Nutrition expert-led cancer nutrition models of care literature was primarily limited to metropolitan, hospital settings and many lacked valid nutrition assessment tools. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned nutrition care, with the most utilised being: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic; nutrition expert-led; flexible and integrated; with multi-directional communication; accessible; and stratified by risk. There is great potential for an evidence-based model of nutrition care to improve the implementation and embedding of high-quality nutrition elements into the cancer pathway.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
期刊最新文献
The association between micronutrient status and clinical outcomes in children with cancer undergoing treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis Reply - Letter to the editor - Comments on “Systematic high-calorie, high-protein oral nutritional support in hospitalized, moderately hypophagic patients at nutritional risk: A randomized-controlled trial” Is this food healthy? Reframing nutrition evidence through counterfactual comparisons The toddler milk intervention trial (ToMI): A randomized controlled trial on the effect of protein content in young child formula on BMI and growth Glucose metabolism's impact on Blastocystis presence in the human gut
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1