图像衍生模型评估经导管自扩张瓣膜置换术患者冠状动脉接近性。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31469
Yuval Barak-Corren, Vladislav Obsekov, Mudit Gupta, Christian Herz, Silvani Amin, Andras Lasso, Michael L. O'Byrne, Matthew J. Gillespie, Matthew A. Jolley
{"title":"图像衍生模型评估经导管自扩张瓣膜置换术患者冠状动脉接近性。","authors":"Yuval Barak-Corren,&nbsp;Vladislav Obsekov,&nbsp;Mudit Gupta,&nbsp;Christian Herz,&nbsp;Silvani Amin,&nbsp;Andras Lasso,&nbsp;Michael L. O'Byrne,&nbsp;Matthew J. Gillespie,&nbsp;Matthew A. Jolley","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The potential for coronary artery compression (CC) during transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) using self-expanding valves (SEV) is not fully understood, yet anecdotal reports suggest that this risk exists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for SEV-TPVR to evaluate the relationship between the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and coronary arteries (CA). CT-derived segmentations of the RVOT and CA were created using machine learning. A 2D map of the distance between the RVOT surface and CA, in systole and diastole, was created. In the subset of patients with post-procedural CTA, the distance before and after TPVR was measured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-two individuals underwent screening for SEV-TPVR, of which 83% (<i>n</i> = 35) had SEV implanted (Harmony = 24; Alterra = 11). Median age was 22.9 years (range 12−60) and 76% had tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). There was no significant change in the distance between the RVOT and LCA between diastole and systole (<i>p</i> = 0.31), yet the RVOT area nearest to the LCA displaced proximally by 11 mm (IQR: 5.6−19.9) in systole. In 8 patients with pre- and post-TPVR CTA, no statistically significant differences were observed in the RVOT-to-LCA relation after intervention. The distance to the LCA was smaller in pulmonary stenosis/atresia patients than those with TOF (median distance 1.2 and 2.1 mm, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.185).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The RVOT area in closest proximity to LCA is dynamic and should be considered when planning TPVR. Special attention should be given to patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary stenosis/atresia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 6","pages":"1479-1485"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image-Derived Modeling to Assess Coronary Proximity in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Valves\",\"authors\":\"Yuval Barak-Corren,&nbsp;Vladislav Obsekov,&nbsp;Mudit Gupta,&nbsp;Christian Herz,&nbsp;Silvani Amin,&nbsp;Andras Lasso,&nbsp;Michael L. O'Byrne,&nbsp;Matthew J. Gillespie,&nbsp;Matthew A. Jolley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The potential for coronary artery compression (CC) during transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) using self-expanding valves (SEV) is not fully understood, yet anecdotal reports suggest that this risk exists.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for SEV-TPVR to evaluate the relationship between the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and coronary arteries (CA). CT-derived segmentations of the RVOT and CA were created using machine learning. A 2D map of the distance between the RVOT surface and CA, in systole and diastole, was created. In the subset of patients with post-procedural CTA, the distance before and after TPVR was measured.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-two individuals underwent screening for SEV-TPVR, of which 83% (<i>n</i> = 35) had SEV implanted (Harmony = 24; Alterra = 11). Median age was 22.9 years (range 12−60) and 76% had tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). There was no significant change in the distance between the RVOT and LCA between diastole and systole (<i>p</i> = 0.31), yet the RVOT area nearest to the LCA displaced proximally by 11 mm (IQR: 5.6−19.9) in systole. In 8 patients with pre- and post-TPVR CTA, no statistically significant differences were observed in the RVOT-to-LCA relation after intervention. The distance to the LCA was smaller in pulmonary stenosis/atresia patients than those with TOF (median distance 1.2 and 2.1 mm, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.185).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The RVOT area in closest proximity to LCA is dynamic and should be considered when planning TPVR. Special attention should be given to patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary stenosis/atresia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\"105 6\",\"pages\":\"1479-1485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在使用自扩张瓣膜(SEV)的经导管肺瓣膜置换术(TPVR)中冠状动脉压迫(CC)的可能性尚不完全清楚,但轶事报道表明这种风险存在。目的和方法:我们对接受SEV-TPVR的患者进行回顾性队列研究,以评估右心室流出道(RVOT)与冠状动脉(CA)之间的关系。RVOT和CA的ct衍生分割使用机器学习创建。绘制收缩期和舒张期RVOT表面与CA之间距离的二维图。在术后CTA患者亚组中,测量TPVR前后的距离。结果:42例患者接受了SEV- tpvr筛查,其中83% (n = 35)植入了SEV (Harmony = 24;Alterra = 11)。中位年龄为22.9岁(范围12-60岁),76%患有法洛四联症(TOF)。在舒张期和收缩期,RVOT与LCA之间的距离没有显著变化(p = 0.31),但在收缩期,最靠近LCA的RVOT区域近端移位了11 mm (IQR: 5.6-19.9)。在8例tpvr术前和术后CTA患者中,干预后RVOT-to-LCA关系无统计学差异。肺动脉狭窄/闭锁患者到LCA的距离小于TOF患者(中位距离分别为1.2 mm和2.1 mm;p = 0.185)。结论:最靠近LCA的RVOT区域是动态的,在规划TPVR时应予以考虑。应特别注意诊断为肺狭窄/闭锁的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Image-Derived Modeling to Assess Coronary Proximity in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Valves

Background

The potential for coronary artery compression (CC) during transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) using self-expanding valves (SEV) is not fully understood, yet anecdotal reports suggest that this risk exists.

Aims and Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for SEV-TPVR to evaluate the relationship between the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and coronary arteries (CA). CT-derived segmentations of the RVOT and CA were created using machine learning. A 2D map of the distance between the RVOT surface and CA, in systole and diastole, was created. In the subset of patients with post-procedural CTA, the distance before and after TPVR was measured.

Results

Forty-two individuals underwent screening for SEV-TPVR, of which 83% (n = 35) had SEV implanted (Harmony = 24; Alterra = 11). Median age was 22.9 years (range 12−60) and 76% had tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). There was no significant change in the distance between the RVOT and LCA between diastole and systole (p = 0.31), yet the RVOT area nearest to the LCA displaced proximally by 11 mm (IQR: 5.6−19.9) in systole. In 8 patients with pre- and post-TPVR CTA, no statistically significant differences were observed in the RVOT-to-LCA relation after intervention. The distance to the LCA was smaller in pulmonary stenosis/atresia patients than those with TOF (median distance 1.2 and 2.1 mm, respectively; p = 0.185).

Conclusion

The RVOT area in closest proximity to LCA is dynamic and should be considered when planning TPVR. Special attention should be given to patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary stenosis/atresia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Unveiling the Microvasculature: The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Its Expanding Role in Cardiovascular Care Prognostic Impact of Pacemaker Implantation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Prosthesis Impella Versus VA-ECMO in Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Exploratory Matched-Cohort Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1