肿瘤负荷评分联合AFP和PIVKA-II (TAP评分)预测肝癌根治性肝切除术后患者预后。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03650-7
Zhan-Cheng Qiu, You-Wei Wu, Jun-Long Dai, Wei-Li Qi, Chu-Wen Chen, Yue-Qing Xu, Jun-Yi Shen, Chuan Li, Tian-Fu Wen
{"title":"肿瘤负荷评分联合AFP和PIVKA-II (TAP评分)预测肝癌根治性肝切除术后患者预后。","authors":"Zhan-Cheng Qiu, You-Wei Wu, Jun-Long Dai, Wei-Li Qi, Chu-Wen Chen, Yue-Qing Xu, Jun-Yi Shen, Chuan Li, Tian-Fu Wen","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03650-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aimed to combine the morphological behavior (tumor burden score, TBS) and the biological behavior (AFP and PIVKA-II) to predict the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1766 HCC patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 1079) and the validation cohort (n = 687) with a ratio of 6:4. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The multivariable Cox regression model was established based on the variables screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify variables independently associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Constructing our prognostic score (TBS-LN(AFP + PIVKA-II) score, TAP score) based on regression coefficients and the predictive ability of the TAP score was compared with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TAP score had good performance in stratifying RFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) in the training cohort and the validation cohort. There still existed significant differences in the intergroup comparisons among three TAP score groups for RFS and OS in the training cohort and the validation cohort. In our LASSO-Cox regression model, the TAP score was independently associated with RFS and OS. The TAP score also outperformed the BCLC stage in predicting RFS (1, 2 and 3 years) and OS (1, 3 and 5 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TAP score had good performance in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection and was superior to the BCLC stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor burden score combined with AFP and PIVKA-II (TAP score) to predict the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after radical liver resection.\",\"authors\":\"Zhan-Cheng Qiu, You-Wei Wu, Jun-Long Dai, Wei-Li Qi, Chu-Wen Chen, Yue-Qing Xu, Jun-Yi Shen, Chuan Li, Tian-Fu Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03650-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aimed to combine the morphological behavior (tumor burden score, TBS) and the biological behavior (AFP and PIVKA-II) to predict the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1766 HCC patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 1079) and the validation cohort (n = 687) with a ratio of 6:4. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The multivariable Cox regression model was established based on the variables screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify variables independently associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Constructing our prognostic score (TBS-LN(AFP + PIVKA-II) score, TAP score) based on regression coefficients and the predictive ability of the TAP score was compared with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TAP score had good performance in stratifying RFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) in the training cohort and the validation cohort. There still existed significant differences in the intergroup comparisons among three TAP score groups for RFS and OS in the training cohort and the validation cohort. In our LASSO-Cox regression model, the TAP score was independently associated with RFS and OS. The TAP score also outperformed the BCLC stage in predicting RFS (1, 2 and 3 years) and OS (1, 3 and 5 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TAP score had good performance in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection and was superior to the BCLC stage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03650-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03650-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在结合形态学行为(肿瘤负荷评分、TBS)和生物学行为(AFP、PIVKA-II)来预测肝癌根治性肝切除术后患者的预后。方法:将1766例HCC患者分为训练组(n = 1079)和验证组(n = 687),比例为6:4。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析无复发(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。根据最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归筛选的变量建立多变量Cox回归模型,以识别与无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)独立相关的变量。基于回归系数构建我们的预后评分(TBS-LN(AFP + PIVKA-II)评分、TAP评分),并比较TAP评分与巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期的预测能力。结果:TAP评分对RFS分级效果较好(p)。结论:TAP评分对肝癌根治性肝切除术后预后的预测效果较好,且优于BCLC分期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tumor burden score combined with AFP and PIVKA-II (TAP score) to predict the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after radical liver resection.

Background: Our study aimed to combine the morphological behavior (tumor burden score, TBS) and the biological behavior (AFP and PIVKA-II) to predict the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection.

Methods: A total of 1766 HCC patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 1079) and the validation cohort (n = 687) with a ratio of 6:4. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The multivariable Cox regression model was established based on the variables screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify variables independently associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Constructing our prognostic score (TBS-LN(AFP + PIVKA-II) score, TAP score) based on regression coefficients and the predictive ability of the TAP score was compared with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage.

Results: The TAP score had good performance in stratifying RFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) in the training cohort and the validation cohort. There still existed significant differences in the intergroup comparisons among three TAP score groups for RFS and OS in the training cohort and the validation cohort. In our LASSO-Cox regression model, the TAP score was independently associated with RFS and OS. The TAP score also outperformed the BCLC stage in predicting RFS (1, 2 and 3 years) and OS (1, 3 and 5 years).

Conclusions: The TAP score had good performance in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection and was superior to the BCLC stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence for surgical management of benign esophageal disease: scoping review and evidence mapping. Influence of nutritional status on patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment for chronic venous disease: a comparative study between endovenous laser ablation and combined crossectomy, stripping, and sclerotherapy. Discrepancies between clinical and radiological assessment of complete remission of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Laparoscopic gastric pouch resection and esophago-jejunostomy after gastric bypass: indications and outcomes. Comparative validation of intraoperative ultrasound versus intraoperative cholangiography for the detection of choledocholithiasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1