使用人工智能从加拿大医疗记录中得出健康数据的社会决定因素的观点:大型多司法管辖区定性研究。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.2196/52244
Victoria H Davis, Jinfan Rose Qiang, Itunuoluwa Adekoya MacCarthy, Dana Howse, Abigail Zita Seshie, Leanne Kosowan, Alannah Delahunty-Pike, Eunice Abaga, Jane Cooney, Marjeiry Robinson, Dorothy Senior, Alexander Zsager, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Mandi Irwin, Lois A Jackson, Alan Katz, Emily Gard Marshall, Nazeem Muhajarine, Cory Neudorf, Stephanie Garies, Andrew D Pinto
{"title":"使用人工智能从加拿大医疗记录中得出健康数据的社会决定因素的观点:大型多司法管辖区定性研究。","authors":"Victoria H Davis, Jinfan Rose Qiang, Itunuoluwa Adekoya MacCarthy, Dana Howse, Abigail Zita Seshie, Leanne Kosowan, Alannah Delahunty-Pike, Eunice Abaga, Jane Cooney, Marjeiry Robinson, Dorothy Senior, Alexander Zsager, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Mandi Irwin, Lois A Jackson, Alan Katz, Emily Gard Marshall, Nazeem Muhajarine, Cory Neudorf, Stephanie Garies, Andrew D Pinto","doi":"10.2196/52244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the social determinants of health could be used to improve care, support quality improvement initiatives, and track progress toward health equity. However, this data collection is not widespread. Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically natural language processing and machine learning, could be used to derive social determinants of health data from electronic medical records. This could reduce the time and resources required to obtain social determinants of health data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand perspectives of a diverse sample of Canadians on the use of AI to derive social determinants of health information from electronic medical record data, including benefits and concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative description approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 195 participants purposefully recruited from Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive and deductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 themes were identified. First, AI was described as the inevitable future, facilitating more efficient, accessible social determinants of health information and use in primary care. Second, participants expressed concerns about potential health care harms and a distrust in AI and public systems. Third, some participants indicated that AI could lead to a loss of the human touch in health care, emphasizing a preference for strong relationships with providers and individualized care. Fourth, participants described the critical importance of consent and the need for strong safeguards to protect patient data and trust.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide important considerations for the use of AI in health care, and particularly when health care administrators and decision makers seek to derive social determinants of health data.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e52244"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on Using Artificial Intelligence to Derive Social Determinants of Health Data From Medical Records in Canada: Large Multijurisdictional Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria H Davis, Jinfan Rose Qiang, Itunuoluwa Adekoya MacCarthy, Dana Howse, Abigail Zita Seshie, Leanne Kosowan, Alannah Delahunty-Pike, Eunice Abaga, Jane Cooney, Marjeiry Robinson, Dorothy Senior, Alexander Zsager, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Mandi Irwin, Lois A Jackson, Alan Katz, Emily Gard Marshall, Nazeem Muhajarine, Cory Neudorf, Stephanie Garies, Andrew D Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/52244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the social determinants of health could be used to improve care, support quality improvement initiatives, and track progress toward health equity. However, this data collection is not widespread. Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically natural language processing and machine learning, could be used to derive social determinants of health data from electronic medical records. This could reduce the time and resources required to obtain social determinants of health data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand perspectives of a diverse sample of Canadians on the use of AI to derive social determinants of health information from electronic medical record data, including benefits and concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative description approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 195 participants purposefully recruited from Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive and deductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 themes were identified. First, AI was described as the inevitable future, facilitating more efficient, accessible social determinants of health information and use in primary care. Second, participants expressed concerns about potential health care harms and a distrust in AI and public systems. Third, some participants indicated that AI could lead to a loss of the human touch in health care, emphasizing a preference for strong relationships with providers and individualized care. Fourth, participants described the critical importance of consent and the need for strong safeguards to protect patient data and trust.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide important considerations for the use of AI in health care, and particularly when health care administrators and decision makers seek to derive social determinants of health data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Internet Research\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"e52244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Internet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/52244\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于健康的社会决定因素的数据可用于改善护理,支持质量改进倡议,并跟踪卫生公平的进展。然而,这种数据收集并不普遍。人工智能(AI),特别是自然语言处理和机器学习,可用于从电子病历中得出健康数据的社会决定因素。这可以减少获取卫生数据的社会决定因素所需的时间和资源。目的:本研究旨在了解不同样本的加拿大人对使用人工智能从电子病历数据中得出健康信息的社会决定因素的观点,包括益处和关注点。方法:采用定性描述方法,对来自安大略省、纽芬兰和拉布拉多省、马尼托巴省和萨斯喀彻温省的195名参与者进行了深入访谈。转录本分析使用归纳和演绎内容分析。结果:共确定了4个主题。首先,人工智能被描述为不可避免的未来,有助于更有效、更容易获得卫生信息的社会决定因素和初级保健的使用。其次,与会者对潜在的医疗保健危害以及对人工智能和公共系统的不信任表示担忧。第三,一些与会者指出,人工智能可能导致医疗保健失去人性化,强调更倾向于与提供者建立牢固的关系和个性化护理。第四,与会者描述了同意的至关重要性,以及需要强有力的保障措施来保护患者数据和信任。结论:这些发现为在卫生保健中使用人工智能提供了重要的考虑因素,特别是当卫生保健管理人员和决策者试图得出卫生数据的社会决定因素时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives on Using Artificial Intelligence to Derive Social Determinants of Health Data From Medical Records in Canada: Large Multijurisdictional Qualitative Study.

Background: Data on the social determinants of health could be used to improve care, support quality improvement initiatives, and track progress toward health equity. However, this data collection is not widespread. Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically natural language processing and machine learning, could be used to derive social determinants of health data from electronic medical records. This could reduce the time and resources required to obtain social determinants of health data.

Objective: This study aimed to understand perspectives of a diverse sample of Canadians on the use of AI to derive social determinants of health information from electronic medical record data, including benefits and concerns.

Methods: Using a qualitative description approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 195 participants purposefully recruited from Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive and deductive content analysis.

Results: A total of 4 themes were identified. First, AI was described as the inevitable future, facilitating more efficient, accessible social determinants of health information and use in primary care. Second, participants expressed concerns about potential health care harms and a distrust in AI and public systems. Third, some participants indicated that AI could lead to a loss of the human touch in health care, emphasizing a preference for strong relationships with providers and individualized care. Fourth, participants described the critical importance of consent and the need for strong safeguards to protect patient data and trust.

Conclusions: These findings provide important considerations for the use of AI in health care, and particularly when health care administrators and decision makers seek to derive social determinants of health data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Hospital-at-Home: New Technology Brings Acute Care to Patients' Homes. Detecting Uncoded Self-Harm in Veterans' Electronic Health Records Using Positive and Unlabeled Learning: Retrospective Observational Study. The Need for Continued Investment in Digital Pain Assessment. Long-Term Outcomes, Moderators, and Predictors in Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for People With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1