Arbaz A Momin, Basel Musmar, Kareem El Naamani, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Dwight Mitchell Self, Matthews Lan, Keenan Piper, Caitlin Ritz, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Pascal M Jabbour, M Reid Gooch
{"title":"特发性颅内高压患者硬脑膜静脉窦压力梯度的预测因素。","authors":"Arbaz A Momin, Basel Musmar, Kareem El Naamani, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Dwight Mitchell Self, Matthews Lan, Keenan Piper, Caitlin Ritz, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Pascal M Jabbour, M Reid Gooch","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS241749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Growing evidence suggests that venous outflow obstruction from venous sinus stenosis (VSS) may lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). There is a paucity of evidence examining clinical predictors of elevated cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) from VSS in patients with IIH. In this study, the authors examined predictors of elevated CVPG, determined the sensitivity and specificity of common presenting symptoms of IIH, and identified the optimal opening pressure threshold on lumbar puncture (LP) to determine which patients should undergo venous manometry (VM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, complications, and opening pressure on LP were collected. Venous pressure gradient across a stenotic dural venous sinus and maximum venous pressure values were recorded from cerebral venograms. VM was considered positive when the CVPG was ≥ 8 mm Hg between two contiguous segments of a dural venous sinus. Sensitivity, specificity, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predominant patient population was young (mean age 38.9 years), obese (BMI ≥ 30; 83.8%), and female (95.0%). Sensitivity and specificity for papilledema were 74% and 70% (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.80), and 70% and 63% (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.75) for pulsatile tinnitus. Vision changes demonstrated a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 50% (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.72). VSS seen on magnetic resonance venography (MRV) demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 53% (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79). Youden's index analysis identified an opening pressure ≥ 25 cm H2O on LP (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.83) as an optimal threshold for predicting elevated CVPG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictors of elevated CVPG on VM include childbearing age, African American race, papilledema, pulsatile tinnitus, obesity (BMI ≥ 30), focal VSS with unilateral dominance in venous drainage seen on MRV, or an opening pressure on LP ≥ 25 cm H2O.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"543-549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of dural venous sinus pressure gradient in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Arbaz A Momin, Basel Musmar, Kareem El Naamani, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Dwight Mitchell Self, Matthews Lan, Keenan Piper, Caitlin Ritz, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Pascal M Jabbour, M Reid Gooch\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.10.JNS241749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Growing evidence suggests that venous outflow obstruction from venous sinus stenosis (VSS) may lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). There is a paucity of evidence examining clinical predictors of elevated cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) from VSS in patients with IIH. In this study, the authors examined predictors of elevated CVPG, determined the sensitivity and specificity of common presenting symptoms of IIH, and identified the optimal opening pressure threshold on lumbar puncture (LP) to determine which patients should undergo venous manometry (VM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, complications, and opening pressure on LP were collected. Venous pressure gradient across a stenotic dural venous sinus and maximum venous pressure values were recorded from cerebral venograms. VM was considered positive when the CVPG was ≥ 8 mm Hg between two contiguous segments of a dural venous sinus. Sensitivity, specificity, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predominant patient population was young (mean age 38.9 years), obese (BMI ≥ 30; 83.8%), and female (95.0%). Sensitivity and specificity for papilledema were 74% and 70% (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.80), and 70% and 63% (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.75) for pulsatile tinnitus. Vision changes demonstrated a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 50% (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.72). VSS seen on magnetic resonance venography (MRV) demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 53% (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79). Youden's index analysis identified an opening pressure ≥ 25 cm H2O on LP (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.83) as an optimal threshold for predicting elevated CVPG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictors of elevated CVPG on VM include childbearing age, African American race, papilledema, pulsatile tinnitus, obesity (BMI ≥ 30), focal VSS with unilateral dominance in venous drainage seen on MRV, or an opening pressure on LP ≥ 25 cm H2O.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"543-549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS241749\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS241749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:越来越多的证据表明,静脉窦狭窄(VSS)引起的静脉流出梗阻可能导致特发性颅内高压(IIH)患者颅内压(ICP)升高。IIH患者VSS引起的脑静脉压梯度升高的临床预测因素缺乏证据。在这项研究中,作者检查了CVPG升高的预测因素,确定了IIH常见症状的敏感性和特异性,并确定了腰椎穿刺(LP)的最佳开口压力阈值,以确定哪些患者应该接受静脉测压(VM)。方法:收集患者的人口学特征、出现的症状、并发症和腰腹动脉开口压力。通过脑静脉造影记录狭窄的硬脑膜静脉窦的静脉压梯度和最大静脉压值。当两段连续的硬膜静脉窦间CVPG≥8 mm Hg时,VM被认为是阳性的。进行敏感性、特异性和多变量logistic回归分析。结果:以年轻(平均年龄38.9岁)、肥胖(BMI≥30;83.8%),女性(95.0%)。乳突水肿的敏感性和特异性分别为74%和70%(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.80),搏动性耳鸣的敏感性和特异性分别为70%和63% (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.75)。视力变化的敏感性为80%,特异性为50% (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.72)。磁共振静脉造影(MRV)显示VSS的敏感性为90%,特异性为53% (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79)。Youden's指数分析发现,LP的开口压力≥25 cm H2O (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.83)是预测CVPG升高的最佳阈值。结论:VM CVPG升高的预测因素包括:育龄、非裔美国人、乳头水肿、搏动性耳鸣、肥胖(BMI≥30)、MRV显示单侧静脉引流优势的局灶性VSS,或LP开口压≥25 cm H2O。
Predictors of dural venous sinus pressure gradient in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Objective: Growing evidence suggests that venous outflow obstruction from venous sinus stenosis (VSS) may lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). There is a paucity of evidence examining clinical predictors of elevated cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) from VSS in patients with IIH. In this study, the authors examined predictors of elevated CVPG, determined the sensitivity and specificity of common presenting symptoms of IIH, and identified the optimal opening pressure threshold on lumbar puncture (LP) to determine which patients should undergo venous manometry (VM).
Methods: Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, complications, and opening pressure on LP were collected. Venous pressure gradient across a stenotic dural venous sinus and maximum venous pressure values were recorded from cerebral venograms. VM was considered positive when the CVPG was ≥ 8 mm Hg between two contiguous segments of a dural venous sinus. Sensitivity, specificity, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed.
Results: The predominant patient population was young (mean age 38.9 years), obese (BMI ≥ 30; 83.8%), and female (95.0%). Sensitivity and specificity for papilledema were 74% and 70% (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.80), and 70% and 63% (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.75) for pulsatile tinnitus. Vision changes demonstrated a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 50% (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.72). VSS seen on magnetic resonance venography (MRV) demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 53% (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79). Youden's index analysis identified an opening pressure ≥ 25 cm H2O on LP (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.83) as an optimal threshold for predicting elevated CVPG.
Conclusions: Predictors of elevated CVPG on VM include childbearing age, African American race, papilledema, pulsatile tinnitus, obesity (BMI ≥ 30), focal VSS with unilateral dominance in venous drainage seen on MRV, or an opening pressure on LP ≥ 25 cm H2O.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.