Akshita Wadhwa, Pravin K Patel, Linping Zhao, Mimis Cohen, Robert J Brown, Eduardo Arias-Amezquita
{"title":"眼部假体重建患者面部差异的视觉评估:基于网络的调查。","authors":"Akshita Wadhwa, Pravin K Patel, Linping Zhao, Mimis Cohen, Robert J Brown, Eduardo Arias-Amezquita","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study intends to determine the visual recognition of facial differences between patients reconstructed with ocular prostheses and its similarities or differences to the contralateral unaffected eye. The authors hypothesize that a prosthetic eye is an indistinguishable replacement for the appearance of an original eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized, local, photo-based survey. Five surveys were designed with ten questions each. Each question included a photo of an eligible patient who underwent prosthetic eye reconstruction. The left and right eyes were marked A and B, respectively. Four options were provided to the surveyees/participants in the study: option A-left eye prosthesis, B-right eye prosthesis, C-both A and B, and (D)-no eye prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall correctness (OA) is 38.4%. This suggested that 38.4% of occasions public raters correctly identified prosthetic eyes. Furthermore, 69.4% have an average correctness per photo (CP) of <50%. The distribution of data points for correctness per rating (CR) shows a mean of 0.382 which further confirms the percentage calculated for overall correctness of photos, thus validating the results obtained from the study. These results suggest that raters could not tell the difference between the prosthetic and the real eyes, regardless of the photo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings revealed a notable consistency among respondents in discerning between the two, indicating a high level of success in mimicking the natural appearance of an eye through prosthetic means, thus proving our hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1565-1569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual Assessment of Facial Differences in Patients Reconstructed With Ocular Prostheses: A Web-Based Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Akshita Wadhwa, Pravin K Patel, Linping Zhao, Mimis Cohen, Robert J Brown, Eduardo Arias-Amezquita\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study intends to determine the visual recognition of facial differences between patients reconstructed with ocular prostheses and its similarities or differences to the contralateral unaffected eye. The authors hypothesize that a prosthetic eye is an indistinguishable replacement for the appearance of an original eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized, local, photo-based survey. Five surveys were designed with ten questions each. Each question included a photo of an eligible patient who underwent prosthetic eye reconstruction. The left and right eyes were marked A and B, respectively. Four options were provided to the surveyees/participants in the study: option A-left eye prosthesis, B-right eye prosthesis, C-both A and B, and (D)-no eye prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall correctness (OA) is 38.4%. This suggested that 38.4% of occasions public raters correctly identified prosthetic eyes. Furthermore, 69.4% have an average correctness per photo (CP) of <50%. The distribution of data points for correctness per rating (CR) shows a mean of 0.382 which further confirms the percentage calculated for overall correctness of photos, thus validating the results obtained from the study. These results suggest that raters could not tell the difference between the prosthetic and the real eyes, regardless of the photo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings revealed a notable consistency among respondents in discerning between the two, indicating a high level of success in mimicking the natural appearance of an eye through prosthetic means, thus proving our hypothesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1565-1569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究背景本研究旨在确定用义眼重建的患者对面部差异的视觉识别能力及其与对侧未受影响眼睛的相似性或差异性。作者假设,义眼是原眼外观的无差别替代物:这是一项基于照片的随机本地调查。设计了五份调查问卷,每份问卷有十个问题。每个问题都包含一张接受过义眼重建手术的合格患者的照片。左眼和右眼分别标记为 A 和 B。调查对象/参与者可在四个选项中做出选择:A-左眼义眼,B-右眼义眼,C-A和B,以及(D)-无义眼:总体正确率(OA)为 38.4%。结果:总体正确率(OA)为 38.4%,这表明 38.4%的公众评分者正确识别了义眼。此外,每张照片的平均正确率(CP)为 69.4%:调查结果显示,受访者在辨别假眼和义眼方面具有明显的一致性,这表明通过假眼模仿眼睛自然外观的成功率很高,从而证明了我们的假设。
Visual Assessment of Facial Differences in Patients Reconstructed With Ocular Prostheses: A Web-Based Survey.
Background: This study intends to determine the visual recognition of facial differences between patients reconstructed with ocular prostheses and its similarities or differences to the contralateral unaffected eye. The authors hypothesize that a prosthetic eye is an indistinguishable replacement for the appearance of an original eye.
Methods: This is a randomized, local, photo-based survey. Five surveys were designed with ten questions each. Each question included a photo of an eligible patient who underwent prosthetic eye reconstruction. The left and right eyes were marked A and B, respectively. Four options were provided to the surveyees/participants in the study: option A-left eye prosthesis, B-right eye prosthesis, C-both A and B, and (D)-no eye prosthesis.
Results: The overall correctness (OA) is 38.4%. This suggested that 38.4% of occasions public raters correctly identified prosthetic eyes. Furthermore, 69.4% have an average correctness per photo (CP) of <50%. The distribution of data points for correctness per rating (CR) shows a mean of 0.382 which further confirms the percentage calculated for overall correctness of photos, thus validating the results obtained from the study. These results suggest that raters could not tell the difference between the prosthetic and the real eyes, regardless of the photo.
Conclusion: The findings revealed a notable consistency among respondents in discerning between the two, indicating a high level of success in mimicking the natural appearance of an eye through prosthetic means, thus proving our hypothesis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.