[儿科创伤护理中遗漏的损伤:仍然是一个挑战]。

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s00113-025-01545-2
Nikos Karvouniaris, Kerstin Kuminack, Jonas Strohm, Hagen Schmal
{"title":"[儿科创伤护理中遗漏的损伤:仍然是一个挑战]。","authors":"Nikos Karvouniaris, Kerstin Kuminack, Jonas Strohm, Hagen Schmal","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01545-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Missed injuries (MI) in children and adolescents with multiple injuries represent a major challenge in pediatric trauma care despite the availability of standard examination protocols and imaging procedures. In the initial phase of care the primary survey is essentially important for the detection and treatment of life-threatening injuries and is well established. After stabilization of the patient in the trauma room and the first phase of treatment, a secondary survey and a tertiary survey should be carried out in order to detect initially MI in the further course and avoid longer term consequences. The majority of MI involve head, thoracic and extremity injuries. Risk factors for MI are younger patient age, the presence of multiple trauma, a higher injury severity score (ISS), a lower value on the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. While MI are frequently described in severely or multiply injured children, a high proportion of MIs are also found in children transferred from other institutions. Therefore, two case studies from a pediatric trauma center at a maximum care hospital and a literature analysis are used to analyze typical MIs. These case examples underline the importance of adhering to a standardized treatment regimen for this patient group. It is advisable to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) with a corresponding risk score, which regulates the tertiary survey, the times of the follow-up examinations and the corresponding (specialist) specific responsibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"403-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Missed injuries in pediatric trauma care : Still a challenge].\",\"authors\":\"Nikos Karvouniaris, Kerstin Kuminack, Jonas Strohm, Hagen Schmal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00113-025-01545-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Missed injuries (MI) in children and adolescents with multiple injuries represent a major challenge in pediatric trauma care despite the availability of standard examination protocols and imaging procedures. In the initial phase of care the primary survey is essentially important for the detection and treatment of life-threatening injuries and is well established. After stabilization of the patient in the trauma room and the first phase of treatment, a secondary survey and a tertiary survey should be carried out in order to detect initially MI in the further course and avoid longer term consequences. The majority of MI involve head, thoracic and extremity injuries. Risk factors for MI are younger patient age, the presence of multiple trauma, a higher injury severity score (ISS), a lower value on the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. While MI are frequently described in severely or multiply injured children, a high proportion of MIs are also found in children transferred from other institutions. Therefore, two case studies from a pediatric trauma center at a maximum care hospital and a literature analysis are used to analyze typical MIs. These case examples underline the importance of adhering to a standardized treatment regimen for this patient group. It is advisable to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) with a corresponding risk score, which regulates the tertiary survey, the times of the follow-up examinations and the corresponding (specialist) specific responsibilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"403-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-025-01545-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-025-01545-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有标准的检查方案和成像程序,但儿童和青少年多发损伤的漏伤(MI)仍然是儿科创伤护理的一个主要挑战。在护理的初始阶段,初步调查对于发现和治疗危及生命的伤害至关重要,这一点已得到充分证实。患者在创伤室稳定并进行第一阶段治疗后,应进行第二次和第三次调查,以便在进一步治疗过程中发现最初的心肌梗死,并避免长期后果。大多数心肌梗死涉及头部、胸部和四肢损伤。心肌梗死的危险因素包括患者年龄较小、多发创伤、较高的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、较低的格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)以及在重症监护室的住院时间过长。虽然心肌梗死经常发生在严重或多重受伤的儿童身上,但在从其他机构转来的儿童中也发现了高比例的心肌梗死。因此,两个案例研究来自儿科创伤中心在最高护理医院和文献分析,以分析典型的MIs。这些案例强调了对这一患者群体坚持标准化治疗方案的重要性。建议制定具有相应风险评分的标准操作程序(SOP),规范第三次调查、随访检查次数和相应(专家)的具体职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Missed injuries in pediatric trauma care : Still a challenge].

Missed injuries (MI) in children and adolescents with multiple injuries represent a major challenge in pediatric trauma care despite the availability of standard examination protocols and imaging procedures. In the initial phase of care the primary survey is essentially important for the detection and treatment of life-threatening injuries and is well established. After stabilization of the patient in the trauma room and the first phase of treatment, a secondary survey and a tertiary survey should be carried out in order to detect initially MI in the further course and avoid longer term consequences. The majority of MI involve head, thoracic and extremity injuries. Risk factors for MI are younger patient age, the presence of multiple trauma, a higher injury severity score (ISS), a lower value on the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. While MI are frequently described in severely or multiply injured children, a high proportion of MIs are also found in children transferred from other institutions. Therefore, two case studies from a pediatric trauma center at a maximum care hospital and a literature analysis are used to analyze typical MIs. These case examples underline the importance of adhering to a standardized treatment regimen for this patient group. It is advisable to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) with a corresponding risk score, which regulates the tertiary survey, the times of the follow-up examinations and the corresponding (specialist) specific responsibilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forschungsintegrität : Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze beim wissenschaftlichen Publizieren. [Trauma team activation following motor vehicle accidents-impact of changes in criteria in the S3 guideline on polytrauma/severely injured patient care]. [Role of trauma surgery in the emergency department from the perspective of the occupational accident insurance physician procedure]. [Orthopedics and trauma surgery in German emergency departments : Evaluation from the AKTIN emergency department registry]. [How much trauma surgery occurs in the emergency department and how is the quality of treatment assured?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1