不同外用双氯芬酸制剂治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:短期和长期治疗比较的荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08465-7
Zhi-Rong Chen, Bing-Keng Chen, Peng Li, Kai Feng
{"title":"不同外用双氯芬酸制剂治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:短期和长期治疗比较的荟萃分析。","authors":"Zhi-Rong Chen, Bing-Keng Chen, Peng Li, Kai Feng","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08465-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of various topical dosage forms of diclofenac (gel, solution, and patch) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials evaluating topical diclofenac formulations in knee osteoarthritis patients. Data on pain relief, functional outcomes, and adverse events were extracted. The primary outcomes were pain and function scores at different follow-up intervals (1-2 weeks, 3-6 weeks, 8-12 weeks), and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis. Diclofenac gel, solution, and patch were all shown to significantly alleviate pain and improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. At 1-2 weeks, the diclofenac patch delivered the most pronounced short-term pain relief (SMD: -0.64; 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.39), while the gel and solution demonstrated sustained efficacy over the mid-term (3-6 weeks) and long-term (8-12 weeks). whereas skin-related adverse events, systemic side effects and withdrawal rates remained low across all formulations. The overall quality of evidence was assessed as moderate to high, reinforcing the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical diclofenac formulations (gel, solution, patch) significantly improve pain and function in knee osteoarthritis compared to placebo. All formulations were well-tolerated, with no significant increase in adverse events. These findings support the use of topical diclofenac for short-term pain relief and functional improvement in KOA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of different topical diclofenac formulations for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of short-term and long-term treatment comparisons.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi-Rong Chen, Bing-Keng Chen, Peng Li, Kai Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-08465-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of various topical dosage forms of diclofenac (gel, solution, and patch) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials evaluating topical diclofenac formulations in knee osteoarthritis patients. Data on pain relief, functional outcomes, and adverse events were extracted. The primary outcomes were pain and function scores at different follow-up intervals (1-2 weeks, 3-6 weeks, 8-12 weeks), and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis. Diclofenac gel, solution, and patch were all shown to significantly alleviate pain and improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. At 1-2 weeks, the diclofenac patch delivered the most pronounced short-term pain relief (SMD: -0.64; 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.39), while the gel and solution demonstrated sustained efficacy over the mid-term (3-6 weeks) and long-term (8-12 weeks). whereas skin-related adverse events, systemic side effects and withdrawal rates remained low across all formulations. The overall quality of evidence was assessed as moderate to high, reinforcing the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical diclofenac formulations (gel, solution, patch) significantly improve pain and function in knee osteoarthritis compared to placebo. All formulations were well-tolerated, with no significant increase in adverse events. These findings support the use of topical diclofenac for short-term pain relief and functional improvement in KOA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08465-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08465-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本荟萃分析评估了不同外用剂量形式的双氯芬酸(凝胶、溶液和贴剂)治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science中进行全面的文献检索,以评估双氯芬酸外用制剂对膝关节骨关节炎患者的疗效。提取疼痛缓解、功能结局和不良事件的数据。主要结局是不同随访时间(1-2周、3-6周、8-12周)的疼痛和功能评分,以及安全性结局。结果:共纳入12项随机对照试验(rct)。双氯芬酸凝胶、溶液和贴片均能显著缓解膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛和改善功能。在1-2周时,双氯芬酸贴片提供了最明显的短期疼痛缓解(SMD: -0.64;95% CI: -0.90至-0.39),而凝胶和溶液在中期(3-6周)和长期(8-12周)表现出持续的疗效。然而,与皮肤相关的不良事件、全身副作用和停药率在所有配方中仍然很低。证据的总体质量被评估为中等到高,加强了研究结果的稳健性。结论:与安慰剂相比,局部双氯芬酸制剂(凝胶、溶液、贴片)可显著改善膝关节骨关节炎的疼痛和功能。所有制剂耐受性良好,不良事件无显著增加。这些发现支持局部双氯芬酸用于KOA患者的短期疼痛缓解和功能改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of different topical diclofenac formulations for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of short-term and long-term treatment comparisons.

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of various topical dosage forms of diclofenac (gel, solution, and patch) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials evaluating topical diclofenac formulations in knee osteoarthritis patients. Data on pain relief, functional outcomes, and adverse events were extracted. The primary outcomes were pain and function scores at different follow-up intervals (1-2 weeks, 3-6 weeks, 8-12 weeks), and safety outcomes.

Results: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis. Diclofenac gel, solution, and patch were all shown to significantly alleviate pain and improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. At 1-2 weeks, the diclofenac patch delivered the most pronounced short-term pain relief (SMD: -0.64; 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.39), while the gel and solution demonstrated sustained efficacy over the mid-term (3-6 weeks) and long-term (8-12 weeks). whereas skin-related adverse events, systemic side effects and withdrawal rates remained low across all formulations. The overall quality of evidence was assessed as moderate to high, reinforcing the robustness of the findings.

Conclusions: Topical diclofenac formulations (gel, solution, patch) significantly improve pain and function in knee osteoarthritis compared to placebo. All formulations were well-tolerated, with no significant increase in adverse events. These findings support the use of topical diclofenac for short-term pain relief and functional improvement in KOA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Microscopic far lateral transforaminal lumbar/thoracolumbar interbody fusion for patients with kyphotic Kummell's disease - a retrospective comparison study with bone cement enhanced screws plus vertebroplasty. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the general rehabilitation adherence scale in individuals with osteoarthritis. Machine learning prediction of surgical approach and clinical heterogeneity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Comparison between arthroscopic surgery and open reduction internal fixation in patients with posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Exploring the relationships between multisite musculoskeletal pain, pain characteristics, and physical function: a cross-sectional analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1