围产期人群PASS和广泛性焦虑症的心理测试:基于医院的证据[23]。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06670-1
Xiaoying Zhong, Mei He, Xiujing Guo, Xixi Li, Bangjun Wang, Changqing Pan, Rong Hu, Hongjing Wu
{"title":"围产期人群PASS和广泛性焦虑症的心理测试:基于医院的证据[23]。","authors":"Xiaoying Zhong, Mei He, Xiujing Guo, Xixi Li, Bangjun Wang, Changqing Pan, Rong Hu, Hongjing Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06670-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety disorders are increasing worldwide, untreated anxiety is linked to maternal and child health outcomes. The purpose of this study is to test psychometric properties of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS) among Chinese women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PASS was translated into Chinese following Beaton's intercultural debugging guide. A total of 494 women in the antenatal and postnatal phase participated ( 268 antenatal and 186 postnatal ) were recruited between March 2023 and July 2023 from two hospitals in Sichuan Province, China. The instruments included the demographic characteristics form, PASS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability and convergent validity were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participant was 31.67 years (SD = 3.78; range from 23 to 49). The CFA showed that four-factor model of the Chinese-PASS had an excellent fit to the data ( χ2 = 1481.2477; df = 425; χ2/df = 3.485; RMSEA = 0.071; CFI = 0.871; NNFI = 0.828; TLI = 0.859; and IFI = 0.871). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of total scale was 0.950, and the split-half reliability of total scale was 0.907. The PASS significantly correlated with EPDS (r = 0.732) and GAD-7 (r = 0.763). The area under the ROC curve for PASS scores was 0.91 (SE = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.89-0.94). At cut-off score of ≥ 19.5, the sensitivity was 0.87. The area under the ROC curve for GAD-7 scores was 0.89 (SE = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.86-0.92). At cut-off score of ≥ 3.5, the sensitivity was 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The result of this study show that the Chinese-PASS had a reasonably adequate validity and reliability and can be used to screen for anxiety disorder among women during the perinatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric testing of Chinese version of screening tools (PASS) and GAD among perinatal population: hospital based evidence 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoying Zhong, Mei He, Xiujing Guo, Xixi Li, Bangjun Wang, Changqing Pan, Rong Hu, Hongjing Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-06670-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety disorders are increasing worldwide, untreated anxiety is linked to maternal and child health outcomes. The purpose of this study is to test psychometric properties of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS) among Chinese women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PASS was translated into Chinese following Beaton's intercultural debugging guide. A total of 494 women in the antenatal and postnatal phase participated ( 268 antenatal and 186 postnatal ) were recruited between March 2023 and July 2023 from two hospitals in Sichuan Province, China. The instruments included the demographic characteristics form, PASS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability and convergent validity were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participant was 31.67 years (SD = 3.78; range from 23 to 49). The CFA showed that four-factor model of the Chinese-PASS had an excellent fit to the data ( χ2 = 1481.2477; df = 425; χ2/df = 3.485; RMSEA = 0.071; CFI = 0.871; NNFI = 0.828; TLI = 0.859; and IFI = 0.871). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of total scale was 0.950, and the split-half reliability of total scale was 0.907. The PASS significantly correlated with EPDS (r = 0.732) and GAD-7 (r = 0.763). The area under the ROC curve for PASS scores was 0.91 (SE = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.89-0.94). At cut-off score of ≥ 19.5, the sensitivity was 0.87. The area under the ROC curve for GAD-7 scores was 0.89 (SE = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.86-0.92). At cut-off score of ≥ 3.5, the sensitivity was 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The result of this study show that the Chinese-PASS had a reasonably adequate validity and reliability and can be used to screen for anxiety disorder among women during the perinatal period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06670-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06670-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:焦虑症在世界范围内正在增加,未经治疗的焦虑症与孕产妇和儿童的健康结果有关。本研究的目的是检验围生期焦虑筛查量表(PASS)在中国妇女中的心理测量特征。方法:按照Beaton的跨文化调试指南将PASS翻译成中文。在2023年3月至2023年7月期间,从中国四川省的两家医院共招募了494名产前和产后妇女(268名产前和186名产后)。工具包括人口统计学特征表、PASS、爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)。验证性因子分析(CFA)、内部一致性信度和收敛效度进行了评估。结果:参与者平均年龄为31.67岁(SD = 3.78;范围从23到49)。CFA分析表明,中国- pass的四因素模型与数据拟合良好(χ2 = 1481.2477;df = 425;χ2/df = 3.485;rmsea = 0.071;cfi = 0.871;nnfi = 0.828;tli = 0.859;IFI = 0.871)。总量表的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.950,分半信度为0.907。PASS与EPDS (r = 0.732)、GAD-7 (r = 0.763)显著相关。PASS评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.91 (SE = 0.01;95% ci = 0.89-0.94)。截止评分≥19.5时,敏感性为0.87。GAD-7评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.89 (SE = 0.02;95% ci = 0.86-0.92)。截止评分≥3.5时,敏感性为0.82。结论:本研究结果表明,中文量表具有相当充分的效度和信度,可用于围产期妇女焦虑障碍的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric testing of Chinese version of screening tools (PASS) and GAD among perinatal population: hospital based evidence 2023.

Background: Anxiety disorders are increasing worldwide, untreated anxiety is linked to maternal and child health outcomes. The purpose of this study is to test psychometric properties of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS) among Chinese women.

Methods: The PASS was translated into Chinese following Beaton's intercultural debugging guide. A total of 494 women in the antenatal and postnatal phase participated ( 268 antenatal and 186 postnatal ) were recruited between March 2023 and July 2023 from two hospitals in Sichuan Province, China. The instruments included the demographic characteristics form, PASS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability and convergent validity were assessed.

Results: The mean age of the participant was 31.67 years (SD = 3.78; range from 23 to 49). The CFA showed that four-factor model of the Chinese-PASS had an excellent fit to the data ( χ2 = 1481.2477; df = 425; χ2/df = 3.485; RMSEA = 0.071; CFI = 0.871; NNFI = 0.828; TLI = 0.859; and IFI = 0.871). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of total scale was 0.950, and the split-half reliability of total scale was 0.907. The PASS significantly correlated with EPDS (r = 0.732) and GAD-7 (r = 0.763). The area under the ROC curve for PASS scores was 0.91 (SE = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.89-0.94). At cut-off score of ≥ 19.5, the sensitivity was 0.87. The area under the ROC curve for GAD-7 scores was 0.89 (SE = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.86-0.92). At cut-off score of ≥ 3.5, the sensitivity was 0.82.

Conclusions: The result of this study show that the Chinese-PASS had a reasonably adequate validity and reliability and can be used to screen for anxiety disorder among women during the perinatal period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
DIALOG+ for service users with chronic depression: a cluster-randomised controlled feasibility trial and qualitative evaluation. Association between visceral adiposity index and incident dementia: a community-based cohort study. Non-pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic drug-related metabolic abnormalities: a systematic narrative review. Ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adolescents with depression. A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based self-help skill strengthening (ISSS) intervention for secondary school teachers: a transdiagnostic intervention for common mental health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1