{"title":"踝关节骨折患者使用石膏固定与活动支架的比较疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Shiran Zhou, Haotian Zheng, Mumin Cao, Zubo Tu, Zhigang Chen, Dong Jiang, Shujun Lv, Haidong Cui","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08451-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An effective and appropriate method to support the ankle joint optimally is particularly important during the healing phase of ankle fractures. The purpose of this review was to assess the functional outcomes, ankle-related quality of life, and associated complications of cast immobilization versus removable braces for the treatment of adult ankle fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies comparing cast immobilization and removable braces after ankle fracture were included by systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis Statements) guidelines. Primary outcome measures included early to mid-late Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes were ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, swelling, pain, time to return to work, calf muscle atrophy, and complications. Subgroup analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed in both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies including 1485 patients met the eligibility criteria. The fracture types of the study included Weber A/B/C and Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation (SER), supination-adduction (SA), pronation-external rotation (PER) and pronation-abduction (PA). The results of the meta-analysis showed that removable braces had better early (mean difference (MD) -2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.26, 0.00) and mid-term functional outcomes (MD -5.81; 95% CI -10.35, -1.27) after ankle fracture compared with cast immobilization. In addition, removable braces caused significantly more wound breakdown (Odds ratio (OR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.17, 0.90) and wound infections (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17, 0.58) than cast immobilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with cast immobilization, removable braces had better functional outcomes in the early and mid-term periods after ankle fractures and were less likely to result in deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Overall, the removable brace is a comfortable ankle fracture option that might improve functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of cast immobilization versus removable braces in patients with ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shiran Zhou, Haotian Zheng, Mumin Cao, Zubo Tu, Zhigang Chen, Dong Jiang, Shujun Lv, Haidong Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-08451-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An effective and appropriate method to support the ankle joint optimally is particularly important during the healing phase of ankle fractures. The purpose of this review was to assess the functional outcomes, ankle-related quality of life, and associated complications of cast immobilization versus removable braces for the treatment of adult ankle fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies comparing cast immobilization and removable braces after ankle fracture were included by systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis Statements) guidelines. Primary outcome measures included early to mid-late Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes were ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, swelling, pain, time to return to work, calf muscle atrophy, and complications. Subgroup analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed in both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies including 1485 patients met the eligibility criteria. The fracture types of the study included Weber A/B/C and Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation (SER), supination-adduction (SA), pronation-external rotation (PER) and pronation-abduction (PA). The results of the meta-analysis showed that removable braces had better early (mean difference (MD) -2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.26, 0.00) and mid-term functional outcomes (MD -5.81; 95% CI -10.35, -1.27) after ankle fracture compared with cast immobilization. In addition, removable braces caused significantly more wound breakdown (Odds ratio (OR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.17, 0.90) and wound infections (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17, 0.58) than cast immobilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with cast immobilization, removable braces had better functional outcomes in the early and mid-term periods after ankle fractures and were less likely to result in deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Overall, the removable brace is a comfortable ankle fracture option that might improve functional outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895275/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08451-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08451-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在踝关节骨折的愈合阶段,有效和适当的方法对踝关节的最佳支撑尤为重要。本综述的目的是评估石膏固定与可拆卸支架治疗成人踝关节骨折的功能结局、踝关节相关生活质量和相关并发症。方法:通过系统检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus和EMBASE数据库,根据PRISMA(系统评价和meta分析声明的首选报告项目)指南,纳入比较踝关节骨折后石膏固定和可拆卸支架的研究。主要结局指标包括早期至中晚期Olerud Molander踝关节评分(OMAS)。次要结局是踝关节背屈和跖屈、肿胀、疼痛、恢复工作时间、小腿肌肉萎缩和并发症。进行亚组分析。在随机对照试验和队列研究中评估偏倚风险。结果:11项研究1485例患者符合入选标准。本研究的骨折类型包括Weber A/B/C和Lauge-Hansen旋后旋外旋(SER)、旋后内收(SA)、旋前旋外旋(PER)和旋前外展(PA)。meta分析结果显示,可摘牙套早期治疗效果较好(MD) -2.14;95%置信区间(CI) -4.26, 0.00)和中期功能结局(MD -5.81;95% CI为-10.35,-1.27)。此外,可拆卸牙套导致更多的伤口破裂(优势比0.39;95% CI 0.17, 0.90)和伤口感染(OR 0.32;95% CI 0.17, 0.58)。结论:与石膏固定相比,可拆卸支架在踝关节骨折早期和中期具有更好的功能结局,且不易引起深静脉血栓形成。总的来说,可移动支架是一种舒适的踝关节骨折选择,可以改善功能预后。
Comparative efficacy of cast immobilization versus removable braces in patients with ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: An effective and appropriate method to support the ankle joint optimally is particularly important during the healing phase of ankle fractures. The purpose of this review was to assess the functional outcomes, ankle-related quality of life, and associated complications of cast immobilization versus removable braces for the treatment of adult ankle fractures.
Methods: Studies comparing cast immobilization and removable braces after ankle fracture were included by systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis Statements) guidelines. Primary outcome measures included early to mid-late Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes were ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, swelling, pain, time to return to work, calf muscle atrophy, and complications. Subgroup analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed in both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.
Results: Eleven studies including 1485 patients met the eligibility criteria. The fracture types of the study included Weber A/B/C and Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation (SER), supination-adduction (SA), pronation-external rotation (PER) and pronation-abduction (PA). The results of the meta-analysis showed that removable braces had better early (mean difference (MD) -2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.26, 0.00) and mid-term functional outcomes (MD -5.81; 95% CI -10.35, -1.27) after ankle fracture compared with cast immobilization. In addition, removable braces caused significantly more wound breakdown (Odds ratio (OR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.17, 0.90) and wound infections (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17, 0.58) than cast immobilization.
Conclusion: Compared with cast immobilization, removable braces had better functional outcomes in the early and mid-term periods after ankle fractures and were less likely to result in deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Overall, the removable brace is a comfortable ankle fracture option that might improve functional outcomes.
期刊介绍:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.