2022 年初美国公众对诊所内和自我管理人工流产方法安全性的态度。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Culture, Health & Sexuality Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274
Rosalyn Schroeder, Lauren Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs
{"title":"2022 年初美国公众对诊所内和自我管理人工流产方法安全性的态度。","authors":"Rosalyn Schroeder, Lauren Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medication abortion (MAB) is extremely safe-including when accessed outside the formal healthcare system-yet misinformation about its safety often influences policy, and research regarding public perceptions about its safety remains limited. In 2021-2022, we administered a US national probability-based online survey to 7,376 English- and/or Spanish-speaking people assigned female (AFAB, ages 15-49; <i>N</i> = 7,016) or male at birth (AMAB, ages 18-49; <i>N</i> = 360) to assess perceptions of MAB and self-managed abortion method safety. To identify characteristics associated with safety attitudes, we estimated weighted proportions and conducted multivariable multinomial logistic regressions. While approximately half of respondents believed MAB is safe when obtained in-clinic (52% AFAB/43% AMAB), very few believed it is safe when obtained outside the formal healthcare system (7% AFAB/5% AMAB). In multivariable analyses, prior awareness of MAB and the belief that abortion should be legal were associated with the belief that MAB is safe, both when accessed in-clinic and outside the formal healthcare system. Respondents living in US states that were restrictive to abortion rights/access were less likely to agree that in-clinic MAB is safe compared to those in protective abortion policy environments. The general public holds misinformation about the safety of MAB, particularly when obtained outside the formal healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes regarding the safety of in-clinic and self-managed abortion methods among the US general public in early 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Rosalyn Schroeder, Lauren Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medication abortion (MAB) is extremely safe-including when accessed outside the formal healthcare system-yet misinformation about its safety often influences policy, and research regarding public perceptions about its safety remains limited. In 2021-2022, we administered a US national probability-based online survey to 7,376 English- and/or Spanish-speaking people assigned female (AFAB, ages 15-49; <i>N</i> = 7,016) or male at birth (AMAB, ages 18-49; <i>N</i> = 360) to assess perceptions of MAB and self-managed abortion method safety. To identify characteristics associated with safety attitudes, we estimated weighted proportions and conducted multivariable multinomial logistic regressions. While approximately half of respondents believed MAB is safe when obtained in-clinic (52% AFAB/43% AMAB), very few believed it is safe when obtained outside the formal healthcare system (7% AFAB/5% AMAB). In multivariable analyses, prior awareness of MAB and the belief that abortion should be legal were associated with the belief that MAB is safe, both when accessed in-clinic and outside the formal healthcare system. Respondents living in US states that were restrictive to abortion rights/access were less likely to agree that in-clinic MAB is safe compared to those in protective abortion policy environments. The general public holds misinformation about the safety of MAB, particularly when obtained outside the formal healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes regarding the safety of in-clinic and self-managed abortion methods among the US general public in early 2022.

Medication abortion (MAB) is extremely safe-including when accessed outside the formal healthcare system-yet misinformation about its safety often influences policy, and research regarding public perceptions about its safety remains limited. In 2021-2022, we administered a US national probability-based online survey to 7,376 English- and/or Spanish-speaking people assigned female (AFAB, ages 15-49; N = 7,016) or male at birth (AMAB, ages 18-49; N = 360) to assess perceptions of MAB and self-managed abortion method safety. To identify characteristics associated with safety attitudes, we estimated weighted proportions and conducted multivariable multinomial logistic regressions. While approximately half of respondents believed MAB is safe when obtained in-clinic (52% AFAB/43% AMAB), very few believed it is safe when obtained outside the formal healthcare system (7% AFAB/5% AMAB). In multivariable analyses, prior awareness of MAB and the belief that abortion should be legal were associated with the belief that MAB is safe, both when accessed in-clinic and outside the formal healthcare system. Respondents living in US states that were restrictive to abortion rights/access were less likely to agree that in-clinic MAB is safe compared to those in protective abortion policy environments. The general public holds misinformation about the safety of MAB, particularly when obtained outside the formal healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Beyond the surface: understanding the cultural roots of corrective rape in South African townships. Norms of masculinity: community voices on sexual and reproductive health communication in rural southwestern Uganda. 'Traditional values' as a cure: The biopolitics of HIV in Putin's Russia. Young adult writers' thoughts on healthy pornography. Selling female pleasure: women's adult industry and its podcasting in mainland China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1