定量磁共振成像方法评估和预测肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞治疗反应。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.042
Jingwen Zhang , Cheng Yan, Yingxuan Wang, Mingzi Gao, Jing Han, Mingxin Zhang, Yujie Chen, Liqin Zhao
{"title":"定量磁共振成像方法评估和预测肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞治疗反应。","authors":"Jingwen Zhang ,&nbsp;Cheng Yan,&nbsp;Yingxuan Wang,&nbsp;Mingzi Gao,&nbsp;Jing Han,&nbsp;Mingxin Zhang,&nbsp;Yujie Chen,&nbsp;Liqin Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>This article reviews the state-of-the-art applications of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) in predicting and evaluating response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with </span>hepatocellular carcinoma<span><span> (HCC). HCC is a highly heterogeneous tumor, and its response to TACE varies significantly among patients. Early identification of treatment response is critical for optimizing management. Promising results have been reported using various qMRI methods, including hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion imaging, </span>perfusion imaging<span><span>, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI (BOLD-fMRI), </span>magnetic resonance elastography<span> (MRE), and artificial intelligence (AI). The coefficient of variation in the hepatobiliary phase of hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI, which quantifies signal heterogeneity, may predict TACE outcomes. Among diffusion imaging methods, diffusion kurtosis imaging has outperformed intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), while perfusion imaging has shown a lower area under the curve (AUC) compared to diffusion imaging. Combining MRS with DWI has achieved an AUC of 1.000 for early assessment of TACE response. However, BOLD-fMRI and MRE remain underexplored and lack established models with key quantitative parameters. AI models incorporating radiomics or deep learning with clinical factors have shown promising AUC values ranging from 0.690 to 1.000 in test sets. However, their added value requires validation through larger prospective studies.</span></span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 11","pages":"Pages 6503-6513"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for the Assessment and Prediction of Treatment Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Jingwen Zhang ,&nbsp;Cheng Yan,&nbsp;Yingxuan Wang,&nbsp;Mingzi Gao,&nbsp;Jing Han,&nbsp;Mingxin Zhang,&nbsp;Yujie Chen,&nbsp;Liqin Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span>This article reviews the state-of-the-art applications of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) in predicting and evaluating response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with </span>hepatocellular carcinoma<span><span> (HCC). HCC is a highly heterogeneous tumor, and its response to TACE varies significantly among patients. Early identification of treatment response is critical for optimizing management. Promising results have been reported using various qMRI methods, including hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion imaging, </span>perfusion imaging<span><span>, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI (BOLD-fMRI), </span>magnetic resonance elastography<span> (MRE), and artificial intelligence (AI). The coefficient of variation in the hepatobiliary phase of hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI, which quantifies signal heterogeneity, may predict TACE outcomes. Among diffusion imaging methods, diffusion kurtosis imaging has outperformed intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), while perfusion imaging has shown a lower area under the curve (AUC) compared to diffusion imaging. Combining MRS with DWI has achieved an AUC of 1.000 for early assessment of TACE response. However, BOLD-fMRI and MRE remain underexplored and lack established models with key quantitative parameters. AI models incorporating radiomics or deep learning with clinical factors have shown promising AUC values ranging from 0.690 to 1.000 in test sets. However, their added value requires validation through larger prospective studies.</span></span></span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 6503-6513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225001862\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225001862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了定量磁共振成像(qMRI)在预测和评估肝细胞癌(HCC)患者经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)反应方面的最新应用。HCC是一种高度异质性的肿瘤,不同患者对TACE的反应差异很大。早期识别治疗反应对于优化管理至关重要。使用各种qMRI方法,包括肝细胞特异性对比增强MRI、扩散成像、灌注成像、磁共振波谱(MRS)、血氧水平依赖功能MRI (BOLD-fMRI)、磁共振弹性成像(MRE)和人工智能(AI),已经报道了令人鼓舞的结果。肝细胞特异性对比增强MRI的肝胆期变异系数量化了信号异质性,可以预测TACE的结果。在扩散成像方法中,扩散峰态成像优于体素内非相干运动和扩散加权成像(DWI),而灌注成像比扩散成像显示出更低的曲线下面积(AUC)。结合MRS和DWI,早期评估TACE反应的AUC为1000。然而,BOLD-fMRI和MRE仍未得到充分探索,缺乏具有关键定量参数的既定模型。将放射组学或深度学习与临床因素相结合的人工智能模型在测试集中显示出有希望的AUC值,范围从0.690到1.000。然而,它们的附加价值需要通过更大的前瞻性研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for the Assessment and Prediction of Treatment Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
This article reviews the state-of-the-art applications of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) in predicting and evaluating response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC is a highly heterogeneous tumor, and its response to TACE varies significantly among patients. Early identification of treatment response is critical for optimizing management. Promising results have been reported using various qMRI methods, including hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion imaging, perfusion imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI (BOLD-fMRI), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and artificial intelligence (AI). The coefficient of variation in the hepatobiliary phase of hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI, which quantifies signal heterogeneity, may predict TACE outcomes. Among diffusion imaging methods, diffusion kurtosis imaging has outperformed intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), while perfusion imaging has shown a lower area under the curve (AUC) compared to diffusion imaging. Combining MRS with DWI has achieved an AUC of 1.000 for early assessment of TACE response. However, BOLD-fMRI and MRE remain underexplored and lack established models with key quantitative parameters. AI models incorporating radiomics or deep learning with clinical factors have shown promising AUC values ranging from 0.690 to 1.000 in test sets. However, their added value requires validation through larger prospective studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Patients' and Providers' Perspective of a Multi-level Approach to Improve Participation in Low-dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening (Empower LCS): A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Real-time Automatic Guidance During Shoulder Ultrasound Scanning with Artificial Intelligence: Reducing Operator Dependency in Rotator Cuff Assessment. Development and Validation of CLARITY (Clinical and Life-impact Assessment of RadiologY): A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Medical Imaging - Study Protocol. Discrepancy Between Preoperative CT and Pathological Tumor Diameters in Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma and Its Association with Postoperative Recurrence. Factors Influencing Dictation Errors in Radiology Resident Reports: A Retrospective, Cross-sectional Analysis at a Single Institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1