对维生素D补充的回顾性真实世界研究:寻找最有效的分子及其使用频率

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2025.03.004
Andrea Crafa , Rossella Cannarella , Vittorio Cannarella , Rosita A. Condorelli , Sandro La Vignera , Aldo E. Calogero
{"title":"对维生素D补充的回顾性真实世界研究:寻找最有效的分子及其使用频率","authors":"Andrea Crafa ,&nbsp;Rossella Cannarella ,&nbsp;Vittorio Cannarella ,&nbsp;Rosita A. Condorelli ,&nbsp;Sandro La Vignera ,&nbsp;Aldo E. Calogero","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>There is still uncertainty regarding the optimal serum levels 25-Hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] and the most effective supplementation strategies, including the choice of molecule and its dosing frequency. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of calcifediol versus two different frequencies of cholecalciferol administration on vitamin D supplementation, and to identity the key parameters that predict response to treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, real-world cohort study included 105 patients, who were divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 21) received cholecalciferol 50,000 international units (UI) once a month, Group 2 (n = 27) received cholecalciferol 25,000 UI every two weeks, and Group 3 (n = 57) received calcifediol 0.266 mg (mg) once a month. The primary outcome measured was the delta increase in 25(OH)D levels after 6 months of treatment, compared to pre-treatment levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed a significant greater delta increase in 25(OH)D levels in Group 1, which received cholecalciferol 50,000 IU once a month, compared to the other two groups. However, multiple regression analysis indicated that neither the type of molecule nor the frequency of administration independently influenced the treatment outcome. Only pre-treatment serum 25(OH)D levels were found to significantly affect the outcome. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, serum 25(OH)D levels below 19.5 ng/dL were predictive of a doubling of pre-treatment values, with high sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pre-treatment serum 25(OH)D levels are valuable for selecting patients who should undergo supplementation. This finding suggests the importance of tailoring therapy according to the degree of vitamin D deficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"47 ","pages":"Pages 265-274"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective real world study on vitamin D supplementation: Looking for the most effective molecule and its frequency of use\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Crafa ,&nbsp;Rossella Cannarella ,&nbsp;Vittorio Cannarella ,&nbsp;Rosita A. Condorelli ,&nbsp;Sandro La Vignera ,&nbsp;Aldo E. Calogero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>There is still uncertainty regarding the optimal serum levels 25-Hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] and the most effective supplementation strategies, including the choice of molecule and its dosing frequency. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of calcifediol versus two different frequencies of cholecalciferol administration on vitamin D supplementation, and to identity the key parameters that predict response to treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, real-world cohort study included 105 patients, who were divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 21) received cholecalciferol 50,000 international units (UI) once a month, Group 2 (n = 27) received cholecalciferol 25,000 UI every two weeks, and Group 3 (n = 57) received calcifediol 0.266 mg (mg) once a month. The primary outcome measured was the delta increase in 25(OH)D levels after 6 months of treatment, compared to pre-treatment levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed a significant greater delta increase in 25(OH)D levels in Group 1, which received cholecalciferol 50,000 IU once a month, compared to the other two groups. However, multiple regression analysis indicated that neither the type of molecule nor the frequency of administration independently influenced the treatment outcome. Only pre-treatment serum 25(OH)D levels were found to significantly affect the outcome. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, serum 25(OH)D levels below 19.5 ng/dL were predictive of a doubling of pre-treatment values, with high sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pre-treatment serum 25(OH)D levels are valuable for selecting patients who should undergo supplementation. This finding suggests the importance of tailoring therapy according to the degree of vitamin D deficiency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 265-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026156142500072X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026156142500072X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景,25-羟基维生素D [25(OH)D]的最佳血清水平和最有效的补充策略(包括分子选择和给药频率)仍不确定。该研究的目的是比较钙化二醇与两种不同频率的胆钙化醇给药对维生素D补充的影响,并确定预测治疗反应的关键参数。方法本回顾性、现实世界队列研究纳入105例患者,分为三组。组1 (n = 21)每月1次给予胆钙化醇50,000国际单位(iu),组2 (n = 27)每2周给予胆钙化醇25,000国际单位(iu),组3 (n = 57)每月1次给予钙化二醇0.266 mg (mg)。测量的主要结果是治疗6个月后25(OH)D水平与治疗前水平相比的增量。结果研究显示,与其他两组相比,第一组的25(OH)D水平显著增加,第一组每月接受一次50,000 IU的胆钙化醇。然而,多元回归分析表明,分子类型和给药频率都不是影响治疗结果的独立因素。只有治疗前血清25(OH)D水平对治疗结果有显著影响。根据受试者工作特征曲线,血清25(OH)D水平低于19.5 ng/dL可预测治疗前值加倍,具有高灵敏度和特异性。结论治疗前血清25(OH)D水平对选择需要补充的患者有一定的参考价值。这一发现表明了根据维生素D缺乏程度量身定制治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retrospective real world study on vitamin D supplementation: Looking for the most effective molecule and its frequency of use

Background & aims

There is still uncertainty regarding the optimal serum levels 25-Hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] and the most effective supplementation strategies, including the choice of molecule and its dosing frequency. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of calcifediol versus two different frequencies of cholecalciferol administration on vitamin D supplementation, and to identity the key parameters that predict response to treatment.

Methods

This retrospective, real-world cohort study included 105 patients, who were divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 21) received cholecalciferol 50,000 international units (UI) once a month, Group 2 (n = 27) received cholecalciferol 25,000 UI every two weeks, and Group 3 (n = 57) received calcifediol 0.266 mg (mg) once a month. The primary outcome measured was the delta increase in 25(OH)D levels after 6 months of treatment, compared to pre-treatment levels.

Results

The study revealed a significant greater delta increase in 25(OH)D levels in Group 1, which received cholecalciferol 50,000 IU once a month, compared to the other two groups. However, multiple regression analysis indicated that neither the type of molecule nor the frequency of administration independently influenced the treatment outcome. Only pre-treatment serum 25(OH)D levels were found to significantly affect the outcome. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, serum 25(OH)D levels below 19.5 ng/dL were predictive of a doubling of pre-treatment values, with high sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion

Pre-treatment serum 25(OH)D levels are valuable for selecting patients who should undergo supplementation. This finding suggests the importance of tailoring therapy according to the degree of vitamin D deficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
期刊最新文献
Phenotype profiling of disease-related malnutrition with inflammation: Document elaborated by the ESPEN special interest group (SIG) ‘‘cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases’’ A randomized trial of iron- and zinc-biofortified pearl millet-based complementary feeding in children aged 12–18 months living in urban slums A multi-strain probiotic formulation alleviates chronic constipation in middle-aged and older adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Dietary potassium and fiber intake, survival, and health-related quality of life, in a prospective multi-center hemodialysis cohort Scurvy, an enduring mimicker and diagnostic dilemma in adults: A review of the 280 relevant published cases in the twenty-first century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1