小型混凝土坝排水防渗墙最佳位置的数值模拟

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES Applied Water Science Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s13201-025-02422-4
Abbas Parsaie, Fatemeh Avazpour, Ehsan Afaridegan
{"title":"小型混凝土坝排水防渗墙最佳位置的数值模拟","authors":"Abbas Parsaie,&nbsp;Fatemeh Avazpour,&nbsp;Ehsan Afaridegan","doi":"10.1007/s13201-025-02422-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a rigorous investigation into determining the optimal placement of a drainage well and cutoff wall to effectively mitigate the uplift force and seepage discharge in small concrete dams. A sophisticated numerical model based on the two-dimensional Laplace equation was developed for this purpose. The Laplace equation was discretized using the finite difference method with a second-order central schema, and the resulting system of equations was efficiently solved using the Gauss–Seidel method with an over-relaxation factor of 1.95. The Neumann boundary conditions were applied to the dam body and cutoff wall, while Dirichlet boundary conditions were imposed on the drainage well, as well as the upstream and downstream sections of the dam. The results exhibited an excellent agreement between the numerical simulations and the observed data, with a mean absolute percentage error of 3.54%. The findings from the numerical simulations revealed that the optimal location for the drainage well is at a distance of 0.2<i>L</i> from the upstream face of the dam, where <i>L</i> represents the dam length. This location resulted in a notable reduction of approximately 38% in the uplift force. Additionally, utilizing a cutoff wall at the upstream portion of the dam led to a reduction of about 15% in the uplift force. Remarkably, when both a cutoff wall and a drainage well were employed at their respective optimal locations, the uplift force decreased by an impressive 53%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02422-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical modeling of optimal location of drainage and cutoff wall under small concrete dams\",\"authors\":\"Abbas Parsaie,&nbsp;Fatemeh Avazpour,&nbsp;Ehsan Afaridegan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13201-025-02422-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents a rigorous investigation into determining the optimal placement of a drainage well and cutoff wall to effectively mitigate the uplift force and seepage discharge in small concrete dams. A sophisticated numerical model based on the two-dimensional Laplace equation was developed for this purpose. The Laplace equation was discretized using the finite difference method with a second-order central schema, and the resulting system of equations was efficiently solved using the Gauss–Seidel method with an over-relaxation factor of 1.95. The Neumann boundary conditions were applied to the dam body and cutoff wall, while Dirichlet boundary conditions were imposed on the drainage well, as well as the upstream and downstream sections of the dam. The results exhibited an excellent agreement between the numerical simulations and the observed data, with a mean absolute percentage error of 3.54%. The findings from the numerical simulations revealed that the optimal location for the drainage well is at a distance of 0.2<i>L</i> from the upstream face of the dam, where <i>L</i> represents the dam length. This location resulted in a notable reduction of approximately 38% in the uplift force. Additionally, utilizing a cutoff wall at the upstream portion of the dam led to a reduction of about 15% in the uplift force. Remarkably, when both a cutoff wall and a drainage well were employed at their respective optimal locations, the uplift force decreased by an impressive 53%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02422-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02422-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02422-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对确定排水井和防渗墙的最佳位置进行了严格的调查,以有效地减轻小型混凝土大坝的上升力和渗水排放。为此,建立了一个基于二维拉普拉斯方程的复杂数值模型。采用二阶中心模式的有限差分法对Laplace方程进行离散化,并采用过松弛系数为1.95的Gauss-Seidel方法对得到的方程组进行高效求解。坝体和防渗墙采用Neumann边界条件,排水井及坝体上下游段采用Dirichlet边界条件。结果表明,数值模拟与实测数据吻合较好,平均绝对百分比误差为3.54%。数值模拟结果表明,排水井的最佳位置为距坝体上游面0.2L处,其中L为坝体长度。这个位置显著降低了约38%的抬升力。此外,在大坝的上游部分使用防渗墙可以减少约15%的升力。值得注意的是,当在各自的最佳位置同时设置防渗墙和排水井时,上拔力下降了53%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical modeling of optimal location of drainage and cutoff wall under small concrete dams

This study presents a rigorous investigation into determining the optimal placement of a drainage well and cutoff wall to effectively mitigate the uplift force and seepage discharge in small concrete dams. A sophisticated numerical model based on the two-dimensional Laplace equation was developed for this purpose. The Laplace equation was discretized using the finite difference method with a second-order central schema, and the resulting system of equations was efficiently solved using the Gauss–Seidel method with an over-relaxation factor of 1.95. The Neumann boundary conditions were applied to the dam body and cutoff wall, while Dirichlet boundary conditions were imposed on the drainage well, as well as the upstream and downstream sections of the dam. The results exhibited an excellent agreement between the numerical simulations and the observed data, with a mean absolute percentage error of 3.54%. The findings from the numerical simulations revealed that the optimal location for the drainage well is at a distance of 0.2L from the upstream face of the dam, where L represents the dam length. This location resulted in a notable reduction of approximately 38% in the uplift force. Additionally, utilizing a cutoff wall at the upstream portion of the dam led to a reduction of about 15% in the uplift force. Remarkably, when both a cutoff wall and a drainage well were employed at their respective optimal locations, the uplift force decreased by an impressive 53%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Economic implications of non-revenue water and long-run marginal cost for Tulcán’s public water utility Photodegradation of azo dyes by advanced oxidation process using magnetic composites including titania supported by graphene oxide: a statistical analysis study Forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using random tree, ANFIS and multi-regression methods Performance and regeneration of a sustainable composite adsorbent in fixed-bed columns for landfill leachate treatment Modeling and optimization of an integrated magnetohydrodynamic–magnetophoretic electrochemical reactor for low-energy deionization from brackish water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1