加强对地区差异的洞察:多地区临床试验中的层次线性模型。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1186/s12874-025-02479-4
Jeewuan Kim, Seung-Ho Kang
{"title":"加强对地区差异的洞察:多地区临床试验中的层次线性模型。","authors":"Jeewuan Kim, Seung-Ho Kang","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02479-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The planning and analysis of multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) has increased in the pharmaceutical industry to facilitate global research and development. The ICH E17 guideline emphasizes the importance of considering the potential for regional differences, which may arise from shared intrinsic and extrinsic factors among patients within the same region in MRCTs. These differences remain as challenges in the design and analysis of MRCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We introduce and investigate hierarchical linear models (HLMs) that account for regional differences by incorporating known factors as covariates and unknown factors as random effects. Extending previous studies, our HLMs incorporate random effects in both the intercept and slope, enhancing the model's flexibility. The proposed figures that depict the observed distribution of the primary endpoint and covariates facilitate understanding the proposed models. Moreover, we investigate the test statistics for the overall treatment effect and derive the required sample size under the HLM, considering both a fixed number of regions and real-world budgetary constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our simulation studies show that when the number of regions is sufficient, HLM with random effects in the intercept and slope provides empirical type I error rates and power close to the nominal level. However, the estimate for the regional variabilities remains challenging for the small number of the regions. Budgetary constraints impact the required number of regions, while the required number of patients per region is influenced by the variability of treatment effects across regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We offer a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing regional differences in the primary endpoint for MRCTs. Through the proposed strategies with figures and required sample size considering the budget constraints, designs for MRCT could be more efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing insight into regional differences: hierarchical linear models in multiregional clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jeewuan Kim, Seung-Ho Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-025-02479-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The planning and analysis of multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) has increased in the pharmaceutical industry to facilitate global research and development. The ICH E17 guideline emphasizes the importance of considering the potential for regional differences, which may arise from shared intrinsic and extrinsic factors among patients within the same region in MRCTs. These differences remain as challenges in the design and analysis of MRCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We introduce and investigate hierarchical linear models (HLMs) that account for regional differences by incorporating known factors as covariates and unknown factors as random effects. Extending previous studies, our HLMs incorporate random effects in both the intercept and slope, enhancing the model's flexibility. The proposed figures that depict the observed distribution of the primary endpoint and covariates facilitate understanding the proposed models. Moreover, we investigate the test statistics for the overall treatment effect and derive the required sample size under the HLM, considering both a fixed number of regions and real-world budgetary constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our simulation studies show that when the number of regions is sufficient, HLM with random effects in the intercept and slope provides empirical type I error rates and power close to the nominal level. However, the estimate for the regional variabilities remains challenging for the small number of the regions. Budgetary constraints impact the required number of regions, while the required number of patients per region is influenced by the variability of treatment effects across regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We offer a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing regional differences in the primary endpoint for MRCTs. Through the proposed strategies with figures and required sample size considering the budget constraints, designs for MRCT could be more efficient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02479-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02479-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:制药行业越来越多地规划和分析多区域临床试验(mrct),以促进全球研究和发展。ICH E17指南强调了考虑潜在区域差异的重要性,这可能是由mrct中同一区域内患者共享的内在和外在因素引起的。这些差异仍然是mrct设计和分析的挑战。方法:我们引入并研究了层次线性模型(HLMs),该模型通过将已知因素作为协变量和未知因素作为随机效应来解释区域差异。扩展先前的研究,我们的HLMs在截距和斜率中都纳入了随机效应,增强了模型的灵活性。所提出的数字描述了观察到的主要终点和协变量的分布,有助于理解所提出的模型。此外,我们研究了总体处理效果的检验统计量,并在考虑固定数量的地区和现实世界预算约束的情况下推导出HLM下所需的样本量。结果:我们的仿真研究表明,当区域数量足够时,具有截距和斜率随机效应的HLM提供了接近名义水平的经验I型错误率和功率。然而,对少数区域的区域变化估计仍然具有挑战性。预算限制影响所需的区域数量,而每个区域所需的患者数量受到各区域治疗效果差异的影响。结论:我们提供了一个全面的框架来理解和解决mrct主要终点的区域差异。考虑到预算限制,通过所提出的带有数字和所需样本量的策略,MRCT的设计可以更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing insight into regional differences: hierarchical linear models in multiregional clinical trials.

Background: The planning and analysis of multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) has increased in the pharmaceutical industry to facilitate global research and development. The ICH E17 guideline emphasizes the importance of considering the potential for regional differences, which may arise from shared intrinsic and extrinsic factors among patients within the same region in MRCTs. These differences remain as challenges in the design and analysis of MRCTs.

Methods: We introduce and investigate hierarchical linear models (HLMs) that account for regional differences by incorporating known factors as covariates and unknown factors as random effects. Extending previous studies, our HLMs incorporate random effects in both the intercept and slope, enhancing the model's flexibility. The proposed figures that depict the observed distribution of the primary endpoint and covariates facilitate understanding the proposed models. Moreover, we investigate the test statistics for the overall treatment effect and derive the required sample size under the HLM, considering both a fixed number of regions and real-world budgetary constraints.

Results: Our simulation studies show that when the number of regions is sufficient, HLM with random effects in the intercept and slope provides empirical type I error rates and power close to the nominal level. However, the estimate for the regional variabilities remains challenging for the small number of the regions. Budgetary constraints impact the required number of regions, while the required number of patients per region is influenced by the variability of treatment effects across regions.

Conclusions: We offer a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing regional differences in the primary endpoint for MRCTs. Through the proposed strategies with figures and required sample size considering the budget constraints, designs for MRCT could be more efficient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
A methodological framework for conducting diagnostic meta-analyses using large literature corpora. The choice of time scales in survival analysis has implications: calendar time versus patients' time-to-event. Multiply-robust estimator of cumulative incidence function difference for right-censored competing risks data. Respondent fatigue in clinical practice: exploring the challenges of increasing PROMS and PREMS utilization in a tertiary hospital. From annotation to adaptation: extracting temporal relations in French clinical narratives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1