在印度以前接触过贝达喹啉的结核病患者中,贝达喹啉耐药性和治疗结果:一项多中心回顾性队列研究

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaf068
Rupak Singla, Samsuddin Khan, Arunima Silsarma, Vijay Chavan, Raman Mahajan, Homa Mansoor, Ravindra Kumar Devan, Neeta Singla, Manpreet Bhalla, Gavish Kumar, Pramila Singh, Aparna Iyer, Mabel Morales, Satish Chandra Devkota, Alpa Dalal, Hannah Spencer, Petros Isaakidis
{"title":"在印度以前接触过贝达喹啉的结核病患者中,贝达喹啉耐药性和治疗结果:一项多中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Rupak Singla, Samsuddin Khan, Arunima Silsarma, Vijay Chavan, Raman Mahajan, Homa Mansoor, Ravindra Kumar Devan, Neeta Singla, Manpreet Bhalla, Gavish Kumar, Pramila Singh, Aparna Iyer, Mabel Morales, Satish Chandra Devkota, Alpa Dalal, Hannah Spencer, Petros Isaakidis","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance presents a critical challenge in the fight against tuberculosis (TB), particularly multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. The emergence of resistance to BDQ, a key drug in treating MDR-TB, poses significant threats to TB treatment effectiveness. Methods The National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases in Delhi and the Médecins Sans Frontières clinic in Mumbai provide BDQ, delamanid, and carbapenem-based regimens for patients with suspected or confirmed treatment failure. BDQ phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) was performed for all BDQ-exposed patients. Treatment regimens were individualized based on exposure history, comorbidities, drug interactions, prior adverse drug reactions, and DST results. Results Of 117 BDQ-exposed patients from December 2020–December 2022, 42 (36%) exhibited a BDQ-resistant strain. Median (IQR) age was 24 (22–32) years, with 63 (54%) females and 94% with pulmonary TB. Patients with a BDQ-resistant strain were older (median age: 27 vs 23 years; P = .04), more likely to have lung cavities (risk ratio [RR]: 1.8; 95%-CI: 1.1–3.1; P = .02), and be resistant to clofazimine (RR: 2.3; 95%-CI: 1.5–3.6; P = .001). Overall, 102 patients initiated treatment. Patients with BDQ-resistance had higher risk of unfavorable outcomes compared with BDQ-susceptible patients (RR:2.1; 95%-CI: 1.5–2.8; P < .001). Overall, 87% (33/38) of patients with BDQ-resistance experienced unfavorable treatment outcomes: 15 (40%) died, 15 (40%) had treatment failure, and 3 (8%) were lost-to-follow-up. Conclusions The study highlights a concerning rate of BDQ-resistance among previously treated patients, resulting in poor treatment outcomes. To prevent treatment failure, we recommend implementing BDQ-DST, developing affordable and accurate rapid tests for BDQ-resistance, and intensifying research and development efforts for newer TB drugs.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bedaquiline Resistance and Treatment Outcomes Among Patients With Tuberculosis Previously Exposed to Bedaquiline in India: A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Rupak Singla, Samsuddin Khan, Arunima Silsarma, Vijay Chavan, Raman Mahajan, Homa Mansoor, Ravindra Kumar Devan, Neeta Singla, Manpreet Bhalla, Gavish Kumar, Pramila Singh, Aparna Iyer, Mabel Morales, Satish Chandra Devkota, Alpa Dalal, Hannah Spencer, Petros Isaakidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciaf068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance presents a critical challenge in the fight against tuberculosis (TB), particularly multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. The emergence of resistance to BDQ, a key drug in treating MDR-TB, poses significant threats to TB treatment effectiveness. Methods The National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases in Delhi and the Médecins Sans Frontières clinic in Mumbai provide BDQ, delamanid, and carbapenem-based regimens for patients with suspected or confirmed treatment failure. BDQ phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) was performed for all BDQ-exposed patients. Treatment regimens were individualized based on exposure history, comorbidities, drug interactions, prior adverse drug reactions, and DST results. Results Of 117 BDQ-exposed patients from December 2020–December 2022, 42 (36%) exhibited a BDQ-resistant strain. Median (IQR) age was 24 (22–32) years, with 63 (54%) females and 94% with pulmonary TB. Patients with a BDQ-resistant strain were older (median age: 27 vs 23 years; P = .04), more likely to have lung cavities (risk ratio [RR]: 1.8; 95%-CI: 1.1–3.1; P = .02), and be resistant to clofazimine (RR: 2.3; 95%-CI: 1.5–3.6; P = .001). Overall, 102 patients initiated treatment. Patients with BDQ-resistance had higher risk of unfavorable outcomes compared with BDQ-susceptible patients (RR:2.1; 95%-CI: 1.5–2.8; P < .001). Overall, 87% (33/38) of patients with BDQ-resistance experienced unfavorable treatment outcomes: 15 (40%) died, 15 (40%) had treatment failure, and 3 (8%) were lost-to-follow-up. Conclusions The study highlights a concerning rate of BDQ-resistance among previously treated patients, resulting in poor treatment outcomes. To prevent treatment failure, we recommend implementing BDQ-DST, developing affordable and accurate rapid tests for BDQ-resistance, and intensifying research and development efforts for newer TB drugs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf068\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贝达喹啉(BDQ)耐药性是防治结核病(TB),特别是耐多药(MDR)菌株的一项重大挑战。BDQ是治疗耐多药结核病的关键药物,其耐药性的出现对结核病的治疗效果构成重大威胁。方法由德里国立结核病和呼吸系统疾病研究所和无国界医生组织孟买诊所为怀疑或确认治疗失败的患者提供BDQ、delamanid和碳青霉烯为基础的方案。所有BDQ暴露患者均行BDQ表型药敏试验(DST)。治疗方案根据暴露史、合并症、药物相互作用、既往药物不良反应和DST结果进行个体化。结果2020年12月- 2022年12月117例bdq暴露患者中,42例(36%)出现bdq耐药菌株。中位(IQR)年龄为24(22-32)岁,其中63(54%)为女性,94%为肺结核。bdq耐药菌株的患者年龄较大(中位年龄:27岁vs 23岁;P = .04),更容易发生肺腔(风险比[RR]: 1.8;95% ci: 1.1—-3.1;P = .02),氯法齐明耐药(RR: 2.3;95% ci: 1.5—-3.6;P = .001)。总的来说,102名患者开始了治疗。bdq耐药患者的不良结局风险高于bdq易感患者(RR:2.1;95% ci: 1.5—-2.8;P, lt;措施)。总体而言,87%(33/38)的bdq耐药患者经历了不良的治疗结果:15例(40%)死亡,15例(40%)治疗失败,3例(8%)失访。结论:该研究强调了先前治疗的患者中bdq耐药率较高,导致治疗效果不佳。为防止治疗失败,我们建议实施BDQ-DST,开发价格合理且准确的bdq耐药快速检测方法,并加强结核病新药的研发工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bedaquiline Resistance and Treatment Outcomes Among Patients With Tuberculosis Previously Exposed to Bedaquiline in India: A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study
Background Bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance presents a critical challenge in the fight against tuberculosis (TB), particularly multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. The emergence of resistance to BDQ, a key drug in treating MDR-TB, poses significant threats to TB treatment effectiveness. Methods The National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases in Delhi and the Médecins Sans Frontières clinic in Mumbai provide BDQ, delamanid, and carbapenem-based regimens for patients with suspected or confirmed treatment failure. BDQ phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) was performed for all BDQ-exposed patients. Treatment regimens were individualized based on exposure history, comorbidities, drug interactions, prior adverse drug reactions, and DST results. Results Of 117 BDQ-exposed patients from December 2020–December 2022, 42 (36%) exhibited a BDQ-resistant strain. Median (IQR) age was 24 (22–32) years, with 63 (54%) females and 94% with pulmonary TB. Patients with a BDQ-resistant strain were older (median age: 27 vs 23 years; P = .04), more likely to have lung cavities (risk ratio [RR]: 1.8; 95%-CI: 1.1–3.1; P = .02), and be resistant to clofazimine (RR: 2.3; 95%-CI: 1.5–3.6; P = .001). Overall, 102 patients initiated treatment. Patients with BDQ-resistance had higher risk of unfavorable outcomes compared with BDQ-susceptible patients (RR:2.1; 95%-CI: 1.5–2.8; P < .001). Overall, 87% (33/38) of patients with BDQ-resistance experienced unfavorable treatment outcomes: 15 (40%) died, 15 (40%) had treatment failure, and 3 (8%) were lost-to-follow-up. Conclusions The study highlights a concerning rate of BDQ-resistance among previously treated patients, resulting in poor treatment outcomes. To prevent treatment failure, we recommend implementing BDQ-DST, developing affordable and accurate rapid tests for BDQ-resistance, and intensifying research and development efforts for newer TB drugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Use of dolutegravir to treat people living with HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (HAM). Use of Dolutegravir for treatment of HTLV-1. Population sensitive linezolid monitoring during global implementation of BPaL based regimens. Impact of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE)-Active Perioperative Prophylaxis in Liver Transplant Patients Colonized by VRE. Infected With the Academic Bug.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1