肺转移性胰腺癌和肝转移性胰腺癌的临床结果和分子特征:来自真实世界证据数据库的结果。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf007
Abrahm Levi, Edik Blais, John Davelaar, Matthew I Ebia, Angela Minasyan, Nima Nikravesh, Gillian Gresham, Lei Zheng, Jennifer W Chuy, Rachna T Shroff, Raymond Couric Wadlow, Patricia DeArbeloa, Lynn McCormick Matrisian, Emmanuel Petricoin, Michael J Pishvaian, Jun Gong, Andrew Eugene Hendifar, Arsen Osipov
{"title":"肺转移性胰腺癌和肝转移性胰腺癌的临床结果和分子特征:来自真实世界证据数据库的结果。","authors":"Abrahm Levi, Edik Blais, John Davelaar, Matthew I Ebia, Angela Minasyan, Nima Nikravesh, Gillian Gresham, Lei Zheng, Jennifer W Chuy, Rachna T Shroff, Raymond Couric Wadlow, Patricia DeArbeloa, Lynn McCormick Matrisian, Emmanuel Petricoin, Michael J Pishvaian, Jun Gong, Andrew Eugene Hendifar, Arsen Osipov","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research demonstrates longer survival for patients with lung-only metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) compared to liver-only mPDAC. The objective of this study is to understand the survival differences, impact of chemotherapy, and associated genomic features of mPDAC that is isolated to either the liver or lung.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Longitudinal clinical outcomes and molecular sequencing data were retrospectively analyzed across 831 patients with PDAC across all stages whose tumors first metastasized to the liver or lung. Survival differences were evaluated using Cox regression. Mutational frequency differences were evaluated using Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median overall survival (mOS) was shorter in patients with liver-only metastasis (1.3y [1.2-1.4], n = 689) compared to lung-only metastasis (2.1y [1.9-2.5], n = 142) (P = .000000588, HR = 2.00 [1.53-2.63]. Survival differences were observed regardless of choice of 1st-line standard-of-care therapy. For 5-fluorouracil-based therapies, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.4y [1.3-1.6] (n = 211) compared to 2.1y [1.8-3.3] for lung-only mPDAC (n = 175) (P = .008113, HR = 1.75 [1.16-2.65]). For gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.2y [1.1-1.5] (n = 175) compared to 2.1y [1.6-3.4] for lung-only disease (n = 32) (P = .01863, HR = 1.84 [1.11-3.06]). PDAC tumors with liver-only metastases were modestly enriched (unadjustable P < .05) for: TP53 mutations, MYC amplifications, inactivating CDK2NA alterations, inactivating SMAD alterations, and SWI/SWF pathway mutations. PDAC tumors with lung-only metastases were enriched for: STK11 mutations, CCND1 amplifications, and GNAS alterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with lung-only mPDAC demonstrate an improved prognosis relative to those with liver-only mPDAC. Responses to chemotherapy do not explain these differences. Organotropic metastatic tumor diversity is mirrored at the molecular level in PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics of lung-only and liver-only metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from a real-world evidence database.\",\"authors\":\"Abrahm Levi, Edik Blais, John Davelaar, Matthew I Ebia, Angela Minasyan, Nima Nikravesh, Gillian Gresham, Lei Zheng, Jennifer W Chuy, Rachna T Shroff, Raymond Couric Wadlow, Patricia DeArbeloa, Lynn McCormick Matrisian, Emmanuel Petricoin, Michael J Pishvaian, Jun Gong, Andrew Eugene Hendifar, Arsen Osipov\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research demonstrates longer survival for patients with lung-only metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) compared to liver-only mPDAC. The objective of this study is to understand the survival differences, impact of chemotherapy, and associated genomic features of mPDAC that is isolated to either the liver or lung.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Longitudinal clinical outcomes and molecular sequencing data were retrospectively analyzed across 831 patients with PDAC across all stages whose tumors first metastasized to the liver or lung. Survival differences were evaluated using Cox regression. Mutational frequency differences were evaluated using Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median overall survival (mOS) was shorter in patients with liver-only metastasis (1.3y [1.2-1.4], n = 689) compared to lung-only metastasis (2.1y [1.9-2.5], n = 142) (P = .000000588, HR = 2.00 [1.53-2.63]. Survival differences were observed regardless of choice of 1st-line standard-of-care therapy. For 5-fluorouracil-based therapies, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.4y [1.3-1.6] (n = 211) compared to 2.1y [1.8-3.3] for lung-only mPDAC (n = 175) (P = .008113, HR = 1.75 [1.16-2.65]). For gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.2y [1.1-1.5] (n = 175) compared to 2.1y [1.6-3.4] for lung-only disease (n = 32) (P = .01863, HR = 1.84 [1.11-3.06]). PDAC tumors with liver-only metastases were modestly enriched (unadjustable P < .05) for: TP53 mutations, MYC amplifications, inactivating CDK2NA alterations, inactivating SMAD alterations, and SWI/SWF pathway mutations. PDAC tumors with lung-only metastases were enriched for: STK11 mutations, CCND1 amplifications, and GNAS alterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with lung-only mPDAC demonstrate an improved prognosis relative to those with liver-only mPDAC. Responses to chemotherapy do not explain these differences. Organotropic metastatic tumor diversity is mirrored at the molecular level in PDAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904785/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的研究表明,肺转移性胰腺腺癌(mPDAC)患者的生存期比肝脏转移性胰腺腺癌(mPDAC)患者的生存期更长。本研究的目的是了解分离到肝或肺的mPDAC的生存差异、化疗的影响以及相关的基因组特征。患者和方法:回顾性分析831例PDAC患者的纵向临床结果和分子测序数据,这些患者的肿瘤首次转移到肝脏或肺部。采用Cox回归评估生存差异。使用Fisher精确检验评估突变频率差异。结果:仅肝转移患者的中位总生存期(mOS) (1.3y [1.2-1.4], n = 689)短于仅肺转移患者(2.1y [1.9-2.5], n = 142) (P = 0.05)。000000588, hr = 2.00[1.53-2.63]。无论选择何种一线标准治疗,均观察到生存差异。在以5-氟尿嘧啶为基础的治疗中,仅肝脏mPDAC的mOS为1.4y [1.3-1.6] (n = 211),而仅肺部mPDAC的mOS为2.1y [1.8-3.3] (n = 175) (P = 0.05)。008113, hr = 1.75[1.16-2.65])。对于吉西他滨/nab-紫杉醇治疗,仅肝脏mPDAC的mOS为1.2y [1.1-1.5] (n = 175),而仅肺部mPDAC的mOS为2.1y [1.6-3.4] (n = 32) (P = 0.05)。[1.11-3.06])。结论:肺源性mPDAC患者的预后优于肝源性mPDAC患者。对化疗的反应不能解释这些差异。嗜器官转移性肿瘤的多样性反映在PDAC的分子水平上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics of lung-only and liver-only metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from a real-world evidence database.

Background: Previous research demonstrates longer survival for patients with lung-only metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) compared to liver-only mPDAC. The objective of this study is to understand the survival differences, impact of chemotherapy, and associated genomic features of mPDAC that is isolated to either the liver or lung.

Patients and methods: Longitudinal clinical outcomes and molecular sequencing data were retrospectively analyzed across 831 patients with PDAC across all stages whose tumors first metastasized to the liver or lung. Survival differences were evaluated using Cox regression. Mutational frequency differences were evaluated using Fisher's exact test.

Results: Median overall survival (mOS) was shorter in patients with liver-only metastasis (1.3y [1.2-1.4], n = 689) compared to lung-only metastasis (2.1y [1.9-2.5], n = 142) (P = .000000588, HR = 2.00 [1.53-2.63]. Survival differences were observed regardless of choice of 1st-line standard-of-care therapy. For 5-fluorouracil-based therapies, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.4y [1.3-1.6] (n = 211) compared to 2.1y [1.8-3.3] for lung-only mPDAC (n = 175) (P = .008113, HR = 1.75 [1.16-2.65]). For gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.2y [1.1-1.5] (n = 175) compared to 2.1y [1.6-3.4] for lung-only disease (n = 32) (P = .01863, HR = 1.84 [1.11-3.06]). PDAC tumors with liver-only metastases were modestly enriched (unadjustable P < .05) for: TP53 mutations, MYC amplifications, inactivating CDK2NA alterations, inactivating SMAD alterations, and SWI/SWF pathway mutations. PDAC tumors with lung-only metastases were enriched for: STK11 mutations, CCND1 amplifications, and GNAS alterations.

Conclusion: Patients with lung-only mPDAC demonstrate an improved prognosis relative to those with liver-only mPDAC. Responses to chemotherapy do not explain these differences. Organotropic metastatic tumor diversity is mirrored at the molecular level in PDAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
期刊最新文献
High Burden of Geriatric Assessment Impairments Across the Adult Age Spectrum in Patients with Cancer. The Quadruple Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer (QuICC) Trial for Mismatch Repair-Proficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Real-world patterns of post-progression treatment and outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Actionable Genomic Landscape of Biliary Tract Cancer in the Indian Population. Granisetron Transdermal Delivery System Versus Palonosetron in the Prevention of Long-delayed Nausea and Vomiting: A Phase III Randomized Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1