德国版急性膀胱炎症状评分内容有效性的新证据:对患者和专家的认知访谈研究。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2
Sophie Nestler, Christian Apfelbacher, Ebru Özkan, Kurt Naber, Katharina Piontek
{"title":"德国版急性膀胱炎症状评分内容有效性的新证据:对患者和专家的认知访谈研究。","authors":"Sophie Nestler, Christian Apfelbacher, Ebru Özkan, Kurt Naber, Katharina Piontek","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is a clinically validated instrument to assess symptoms and quality of life in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). A previous study examining the content validity of the German version of the ACSS has shown some methodological limitations when rated against the criteria for content validity of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. Extending the existing evidence, the present study aimed to assess the content validity of the German version of the ACSS according to the criteria of the COSMIN methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In individual cognitive interviews following a structured, standardized interview guide, women with a history of uUTI and experts from different medical fields rated the instructions, items, response options and recall period of the ACSS in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. Additionally, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated based on expert assessments to quantify content validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients and 14 experts participated in two rounds of interviews. The overall relevance and comprehensiveness of the instrument were rated as appropriate. Modifications focused on improving comprehensibility. Ten items underwent minor modifications or were given examples to enhance comprehensibility. The scales of five items were linguistically revised. Confirming good content validity, CVI was 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive qualitative assessments support content validity of the ACSS for evaluating symptoms and quality of life in women with uUTIs. Minor modifications addressed comprehensibility. Psychometric validation of the revised ACSS is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New evidence for content validity of the German version of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score: cognitive interview study among patients and experts.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Nestler, Christian Apfelbacher, Ebru Özkan, Kurt Naber, Katharina Piontek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is a clinically validated instrument to assess symptoms and quality of life in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). A previous study examining the content validity of the German version of the ACSS has shown some methodological limitations when rated against the criteria for content validity of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. Extending the existing evidence, the present study aimed to assess the content validity of the German version of the ACSS according to the criteria of the COSMIN methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In individual cognitive interviews following a structured, standardized interview guide, women with a history of uUTI and experts from different medical fields rated the instructions, items, response options and recall period of the ACSS in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. Additionally, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated based on expert assessments to quantify content validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients and 14 experts participated in two rounds of interviews. The overall relevance and comprehensiveness of the instrument were rated as appropriate. Modifications focused on improving comprehensibility. Ten items underwent minor modifications or were given examples to enhance comprehensibility. The scales of five items were linguistically revised. Confirming good content validity, CVI was 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive qualitative assessments support content validity of the ACSS for evaluating symptoms and quality of life in women with uUTIs. Minor modifications addressed comprehensibility. Psychometric validation of the revised ACSS is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性膀胱炎症状评分(ACSS)是一种临床验证的工具,用于评估女性非并发症尿路感染(utis)的症状和生活质量。先前的一项研究检查了德国版ACSS的内容效度,在与基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)倡议的内容效度标准进行评级时,发现了一些方法上的局限性。在现有证据的基础上,本研究旨在根据COSMIN方法的标准评估德语版ACSS的内容效度。方法:采用结构化、标准化的访谈指南进行个体认知访谈,由有uUTI病史的女性和不同医学领域的专家对ACSS的说明、项目、反应选项和回忆期的相关性、全面性和可理解性进行评分。此外,根据专家评估计算内容效度指数(CVI),量化内容效度。结果:共有14名患者和14名专家参与了两轮访谈。该文书的总体相关性和全面性被评为适当。修改的重点是提高可理解性。有10个项目作了轻微修改或举例,以提高可理解性。对五个项目的量表进行了语言上的修改。CVI为0.97,内容效度较好。结论:全面的定性评估支持ACSS在评估utis女性症状和生活质量方面的内容效度。小的修改解决了可理解性。建议对修订后的ACSS进行心理测量验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New evidence for content validity of the German version of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score: cognitive interview study among patients and experts.

Purpose: The Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is a clinically validated instrument to assess symptoms and quality of life in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). A previous study examining the content validity of the German version of the ACSS has shown some methodological limitations when rated against the criteria for content validity of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. Extending the existing evidence, the present study aimed to assess the content validity of the German version of the ACSS according to the criteria of the COSMIN methodology.

Methods: In individual cognitive interviews following a structured, standardized interview guide, women with a history of uUTI and experts from different medical fields rated the instructions, items, response options and recall period of the ACSS in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. Additionally, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated based on expert assessments to quantify content validity.

Results: A total of 14 patients and 14 experts participated in two rounds of interviews. The overall relevance and comprehensiveness of the instrument were rated as appropriate. Modifications focused on improving comprehensibility. Ten items underwent minor modifications or were given examples to enhance comprehensibility. The scales of five items were linguistically revised. Confirming good content validity, CVI was 0.97.

Conclusions: Comprehensive qualitative assessments support content validity of the ACSS for evaluating symptoms and quality of life in women with uUTIs. Minor modifications addressed comprehensibility. Psychometric validation of the revised ACSS is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study on the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) in health management for patients with urological and andrological diseases: a multidimensional quality evaluation and applicability analysis. Day-case robotic adrenalectomy under ERAS protocol: early outcomes from a single-centre experience. Present and future of ureteral stent technology: a review by the EAU endourology section. APOE ε2/ε3 is associated with multi-layered protection against prostate cancer in Chinese men. Mental health diagnoses among patients with complex hypospadias.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1