IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.005
Ulrike M Stamer, Patricia Lavand'homme, Debora M Hofer, Antonia Barke, Beatrice Korwisi
{"title":"Chronic postsurgical pain in the ICD-11: implications for anaesthesiology and pain medicine.","authors":"Ulrike M Stamer, Patricia Lavand'homme, Debora M Hofer, Antonia Barke, Beatrice Korwisi","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is associated with reduced health-related quality of life and disability. In some patients, it can result in long-term opioid use even after minor surgery. Epidemiological studies have reported highly varying rates of CPSP, largely because researchers have used different definitions with self-defined cut-offs for pain scores. With the introduction of the 11th revision of the World Health Organisation International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), chronic pain is now recognised as an entity of its own, its biopsychosocial nature is emphasised, and its definition is standardised. Compared with the ICD-11 definition, the prevalence of CPSP might have been overestimated in previous studies. The ICD-11 provides a multifactorial assessment of pain severity, referring to pain intensity, pain-related interference, and pain-related distress, which cover the biopsychosocial aspects of chronic pain. These three scores can be added as extension codes to any pain diagnosis. Harmonisation of the CPSP criteria within the different coding levels of the ICD-11 might improve discrimination of CPSP from other chronic pain conditions not induced by surgery. Although neuropathic CPSP increases pain severity and requires alternative therapeutic approaches to nociceptive pain, a specific code to differentiate between neuropathic and non-neuropathic CPSP is not available. For clinical practice and research, the evidence-based ICD-11 definition, which provides clear-cut diagnostic criteria, should generally be used instead of pain scores alone. This will improve the comparability of data, form the basis for future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and facilitate communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性手术后疼痛(CPSP)与健康相关的生活质量下降和残疾有关。在某些患者中,即使是小手术后也会导致长期使用阿片类药物。流行病学研究报告的 CPSP 发生率差异很大,这主要是因为研究人员使用了不同的定义和自行定义的疼痛评分临界值。随着世界卫生组织《国际疾病和相关健康问题分类》(ICD-11)第 11 次修订版的推出,慢性疼痛现在被认为是一个独立的实体,其生物心理社会性质得到了强调,其定义也得到了标准化。与 ICD-11 的定义相比,以往的研究可能高估了 CPSP 的患病率。ICD-11 对疼痛严重程度进行了多因素评估,包括疼痛强度、疼痛相关干扰和疼痛相关困扰,涵盖了慢性疼痛的生物心理社会方面。这三个评分可作为扩展代码添加到任何疼痛诊断中。在 ICD-11 的不同编码级别中统一 CPSP 标准可能会提高 CPSP 与其他非手术引起的慢性疼痛病症的区分度。虽然神经病理性 CPSP 会增加疼痛的严重程度,并需要采用疼痛性疼痛的替代治疗方法,但目前还没有区分神经病理性和非神经病理性 CPSP 的特定代码。在临床实践和研究中,一般应使用以证据为基础的 ICD-11 定义,该定义提供了明确的诊断标准,而不应仅仅使用疼痛评分。这将提高数据的可比性,为未来的诊断和治疗方法奠定基础,并促进交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chronic postsurgical pain in the ICD-11: implications for anaesthesiology and pain medicine.

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is associated with reduced health-related quality of life and disability. In some patients, it can result in long-term opioid use even after minor surgery. Epidemiological studies have reported highly varying rates of CPSP, largely because researchers have used different definitions with self-defined cut-offs for pain scores. With the introduction of the 11th revision of the World Health Organisation International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), chronic pain is now recognised as an entity of its own, its biopsychosocial nature is emphasised, and its definition is standardised. Compared with the ICD-11 definition, the prevalence of CPSP might have been overestimated in previous studies. The ICD-11 provides a multifactorial assessment of pain severity, referring to pain intensity, pain-related interference, and pain-related distress, which cover the biopsychosocial aspects of chronic pain. These three scores can be added as extension codes to any pain diagnosis. Harmonisation of the CPSP criteria within the different coding levels of the ICD-11 might improve discrimination of CPSP from other chronic pain conditions not induced by surgery. Although neuropathic CPSP increases pain severity and requires alternative therapeutic approaches to nociceptive pain, a specific code to differentiate between neuropathic and non-neuropathic CPSP is not available. For clinical practice and research, the evidence-based ICD-11 definition, which provides clear-cut diagnostic criteria, should generally be used instead of pain scores alone. This will improve the comparability of data, form the basis for future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and facilitate communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Associate Editorial Board and cover image caption ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam for loss of consciousness in young children. Etomidate and its derivatives: time to say goodbye? Br J Anaesth 2024; 134: 11-13.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1