社会网络在素食采用和维持中的作用:来自荷兰北部的前瞻性研究。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.107951
Kristina Thompson , Yinjie Zhu , Spencer Moore
{"title":"社会网络在素食采用和维持中的作用:来自荷兰北部的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Kristina Thompson ,&nbsp;Yinjie Zhu ,&nbsp;Spencer Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wider adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets would be mutually beneficial for human and environmental health. Social networks have been identified as a factor that would support this transition. While social networks' role in vegetarian diet adoption has been studied, their role in vegetarian diet maintenance over time has received much less attention. To address this gap, we investigated the extent to which having vegetarian close ties (family members and/or partners) was related to participants' likelihood of eating vegetarian. Data were derived from Lifelines, a large cohort study from the northern Netherlands (n = 60,639). Two assessments an average of 3.9 years apart were used. We studied the interaction of close ties' diet trajectories (either vegetarian or omnivore) at baseline and follow-up, and their relationship to participants' own diet trajectories at baseline and follow-up. Mixed multinomial logistic regression was used to account for clustering among families. Participants closely mirrored their close ties' diet trajectories. Having close ties who were vegetarians at baseline and follow-up was associated with the highest probability of the participants themselves also eating vegetarian at both assessments (Pr = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.08). In contrast, participants with no vegetarian close ties at baseline and follow-up were the least likely to be vegetarians themselves at both assessments (Pr = 0.02, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.02). Partners particularly had a strong influence on participants’ diet trajectories compared to other family members. It appears that the closer the tie was, the more closely diet trajectories paralleled each another. More broadly, leveraging social networks could be effective in encouraging more widespread adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social networks’ role in vegetarian diet adoption and maintenance: A prospective study from the northern Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Thompson ,&nbsp;Yinjie Zhu ,&nbsp;Spencer Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wider adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets would be mutually beneficial for human and environmental health. Social networks have been identified as a factor that would support this transition. While social networks' role in vegetarian diet adoption has been studied, their role in vegetarian diet maintenance over time has received much less attention. To address this gap, we investigated the extent to which having vegetarian close ties (family members and/or partners) was related to participants' likelihood of eating vegetarian. Data were derived from Lifelines, a large cohort study from the northern Netherlands (n = 60,639). Two assessments an average of 3.9 years apart were used. We studied the interaction of close ties' diet trajectories (either vegetarian or omnivore) at baseline and follow-up, and their relationship to participants' own diet trajectories at baseline and follow-up. Mixed multinomial logistic regression was used to account for clustering among families. Participants closely mirrored their close ties' diet trajectories. Having close ties who were vegetarians at baseline and follow-up was associated with the highest probability of the participants themselves also eating vegetarian at both assessments (Pr = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.08). In contrast, participants with no vegetarian close ties at baseline and follow-up were the least likely to be vegetarians themselves at both assessments (Pr = 0.02, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.02). Partners particularly had a strong influence on participants’ diet trajectories compared to other family members. It appears that the closer the tie was, the more closely diet trajectories paralleled each another. More broadly, leveraging social networks could be effective in encouraging more widespread adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

更广泛地采用和保持素食饮食对人类和环境健康都是有益的。社会网络被认为是支持这种转变的一个因素。虽然社会网络在素食接受中的作用已经被研究过,但它们在长期素食维持中的作用却很少受到关注。为了解决这一差距,我们调查了有一个素食的亲密关系(家庭成员或伴侣)与参与者吃素食的可能性之间的关系。数据来自生命线,这是一项来自荷兰北部的大型队列研究(n = 60,639)。两次评估平均间隔3.9年。我们研究了亲密关系的饮食轨迹(素食者或杂食者)在基线和随访期间的相互作用,以及它们与参与者自己的饮食轨迹在基线和随访期间的关系。混合多项逻辑回归用于解释家庭之间的聚类。参与者密切反映了他们亲密伴侣的饮食轨迹。在基线和随访时是素食者的亲密关系与参与者在两次评估中也是素食者的最高可能性相关(Pr=0.08, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.08)。相比之下,在基线和随访中没有素食亲密关系的参与者在两次评估中都是最不可能成为素食者的(Pr=0.02, 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.02)。与其他家庭成员相比,伴侣对参与者的饮食轨迹影响尤其大。研究表明,这种联系越紧密,饮食轨迹就越相似。利用社会网络可以有效地鼓励更广泛地采用和维持素食饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social networks’ role in vegetarian diet adoption and maintenance: A prospective study from the northern Netherlands
Wider adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets would be mutually beneficial for human and environmental health. Social networks have been identified as a factor that would support this transition. While social networks' role in vegetarian diet adoption has been studied, their role in vegetarian diet maintenance over time has received much less attention. To address this gap, we investigated the extent to which having vegetarian close ties (family members and/or partners) was related to participants' likelihood of eating vegetarian. Data were derived from Lifelines, a large cohort study from the northern Netherlands (n = 60,639). Two assessments an average of 3.9 years apart were used. We studied the interaction of close ties' diet trajectories (either vegetarian or omnivore) at baseline and follow-up, and their relationship to participants' own diet trajectories at baseline and follow-up. Mixed multinomial logistic regression was used to account for clustering among families. Participants closely mirrored their close ties' diet trajectories. Having close ties who were vegetarians at baseline and follow-up was associated with the highest probability of the participants themselves also eating vegetarian at both assessments (Pr = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.08). In contrast, participants with no vegetarian close ties at baseline and follow-up were the least likely to be vegetarians themselves at both assessments (Pr = 0.02, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.02). Partners particularly had a strong influence on participants’ diet trajectories compared to other family members. It appears that the closer the tie was, the more closely diet trajectories paralleled each another. More broadly, leveraging social networks could be effective in encouraging more widespread adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Exploring consumer motivations to increase pulse protein in Portuguese family meals using means-end chain theory and novel recipes Seeking answers, trying insects: Induced curiosity as a catalyst for novel food consumption Parent feeding strategies for infants and young children at developmental risk in the first 24 months and their relationship to feeding stage and outcomes Exploring the role of infant temperament in the relationship between self-feeding and parental responsiveness Itinerant food environment: A look at the homeless population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1