Suis Galischa Wati, Christantie Effendy, Syahirul Alim, Hersinta Retno Martani, Wenny Artanty Nisman
{"title":"对工作环境中护士幸福感测量仪器的系统评价","authors":"Suis Galischa Wati, Christantie Effendy, Syahirul Alim, Hersinta Retno Martani, Wenny Artanty Nisman","doi":"10.1111/jan.16871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To identify instruments for measuring nurses' well-being at work, evaluate their dimensions, validity, reliability, and determine the most comprehensive of all.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic literature review of measurement properties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>Science Direct, PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, Scopus, Sage, and Google Scholar for all periods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Review Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Quantitative research articles that provide information on psychometric testing of instruments for measuring nurses' well-being were analyzed, excluding non-scientific, and non-English sources. The Consensus-based Standards for The Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) was used to identify the risk of bias. Terwee quality criteria were used to assess the quality of the measurement properties. The synthesis process was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024532860).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 22 articles, covering 17 instruments developed based on different theories and concepts were identified. The number of items ranges from 5–69, with 1–8 dimensions, where the interpersonal relationship is the most widely used dimension. Only a few instruments assess nurses' well-being in particular units. Validity and reliability were tested through various methods, but none met all COSMIN criteria. GRADE analysis revealed that over half of the instruments had low-quality assessment results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Instruments varied in structure, including the number of items, scales, and dimensions. The low-quality assessment results of most instruments highlight the need for better instrument development and validation, especially for nurses in specific units by considering their respective work culture and climate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>This study emphasizes the need to develop an instrument to measure nurses' well-being in certain units specifically according to the COSMIN guidelines to improve its validity and reliability. The results of such measurements can help management formulate effective intervention strategies and serve as a basis for further research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No patient or public contribution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 12","pages":"8470-8503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Instruments to Measure Nurses' Well-Being in the Work Environment\",\"authors\":\"Suis Galischa Wati, Christantie Effendy, Syahirul Alim, Hersinta Retno Martani, Wenny Artanty Nisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To identify instruments for measuring nurses' well-being at work, evaluate their dimensions, validity, reliability, and determine the most comprehensive of all.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Systematic literature review of measurement properties.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>Science Direct, PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, Scopus, Sage, and Google Scholar for all periods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Review Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quantitative research articles that provide information on psychometric testing of instruments for measuring nurses' well-being were analyzed, excluding non-scientific, and non-English sources. The Consensus-based Standards for The Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) was used to identify the risk of bias. Terwee quality criteria were used to assess the quality of the measurement properties. The synthesis process was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024532860).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 22 articles, covering 17 instruments developed based on different theories and concepts were identified. The number of items ranges from 5–69, with 1–8 dimensions, where the interpersonal relationship is the most widely used dimension. Only a few instruments assess nurses' well-being in particular units. Validity and reliability were tested through various methods, but none met all COSMIN criteria. GRADE analysis revealed that over half of the instruments had low-quality assessment results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Instruments varied in structure, including the number of items, scales, and dimensions. The low-quality assessment results of most instruments highlight the need for better instrument development and validation, especially for nurses in specific units by considering their respective work culture and climate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Impact</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study emphasizes the need to develop an instrument to measure nurses' well-being in certain units specifically according to the COSMIN guidelines to improve its validity and reliability. The results of such measurements can help management formulate effective intervention strategies and serve as a basis for further research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>No patient or public contribution.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"81 12\",\"pages\":\"8470-8503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16871\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Systematic Review of Instruments to Measure Nurses' Well-Being in the Work Environment
Aims
To identify instruments for measuring nurses' well-being at work, evaluate their dimensions, validity, reliability, and determine the most comprehensive of all.
Design
Systematic literature review of measurement properties.
Data Sources
Science Direct, PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, Scopus, Sage, and Google Scholar for all periods.
Review Methods
Quantitative research articles that provide information on psychometric testing of instruments for measuring nurses' well-being were analyzed, excluding non-scientific, and non-English sources. The Consensus-based Standards for The Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) was used to identify the risk of bias. Terwee quality criteria were used to assess the quality of the measurement properties. The synthesis process was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024532860).
Results
A total of 22 articles, covering 17 instruments developed based on different theories and concepts were identified. The number of items ranges from 5–69, with 1–8 dimensions, where the interpersonal relationship is the most widely used dimension. Only a few instruments assess nurses' well-being in particular units. Validity and reliability were tested through various methods, but none met all COSMIN criteria. GRADE analysis revealed that over half of the instruments had low-quality assessment results.
Conclusion
Instruments varied in structure, including the number of items, scales, and dimensions. The low-quality assessment results of most instruments highlight the need for better instrument development and validation, especially for nurses in specific units by considering their respective work culture and climate.
Impact
This study emphasizes the need to develop an instrument to measure nurses' well-being in certain units specifically according to the COSMIN guidelines to improve its validity and reliability. The results of such measurements can help management formulate effective intervention strategies and serve as a basis for further research.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
