经双内侧深筋膜入路内镜下足底筋膜释放治疗难治性足底筋膜炎:一种有效、安全、快速的手术入路。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06499-z
Jianing Yu, Jinxi An, Sen Wang, Wei Liu, Ziheng Bu, Junchao Huang, Peng Wang, Tao Zhu, Peng Wu, Min Zhu
{"title":"经双内侧深筋膜入路内镜下足底筋膜释放治疗难治性足底筋膜炎:一种有效、安全、快速的手术入路。","authors":"Jianing Yu, Jinxi An, Sen Wang, Wei Liu, Ziheng Bu, Junchao Huang, Peng Wang, Tao Zhu, Peng Wu, Min Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06499-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach for the treatment of refractory plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted involving 34 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis treated by endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach. Among them, 25 patients had concurrent calcaneal spurs. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, while structural evaluations included the Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle (MLAA), navicular tuberosity height-to-foot length ratio (NH/FL), and the Arch Index (AI). Differences between patients with and without calcaneal spurs were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up, with primary wound healing in all cases. Two patients experienced transient plantar skin numbness and small toe abduction difficulty, which resolved within three months. The VAS score decreased significantly from 6.53 ± 1.19 preoperatively to 1.18 ± 0.76 postoperatively, and the AOFAS score improved from 52.41 ± 5.23 to 93.29 ± 3.91 (both P < 0.05), indicating statistical significance. However, changes in the MLAA, NH/FL and AI were not statistically significant. Apart from age differences (49.04 ± 4.41 vs. 34.56 ± 3.13), no significant differences in other scores were observed between the calcaneal spur group and the non-calcaneal spur group at the final follow-up. Moreover, compared to the methods reported in other studies, our study demonstrated a shorter operative time and superior pain and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual medial deep fascia approach for endoscopic plantar fascia release is a safe, quick, effective, and minimally invasive technique that yields favourable clinical outcomes. It has certain advantages compared to other techniques. The presence of calcaneal spurs does not impact postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"1373-1385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic plantar fascia release via dual medial deep fascia approach for refractory plantar fasciitis: an effective, safe, and rapid surgical approach.\",\"authors\":\"Jianing Yu, Jinxi An, Sen Wang, Wei Liu, Ziheng Bu, Junchao Huang, Peng Wang, Tao Zhu, Peng Wu, Min Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-025-06499-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach for the treatment of refractory plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted involving 34 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis treated by endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach. Among them, 25 patients had concurrent calcaneal spurs. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, while structural evaluations included the Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle (MLAA), navicular tuberosity height-to-foot length ratio (NH/FL), and the Arch Index (AI). Differences between patients with and without calcaneal spurs were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up, with primary wound healing in all cases. Two patients experienced transient plantar skin numbness and small toe abduction difficulty, which resolved within three months. The VAS score decreased significantly from 6.53 ± 1.19 preoperatively to 1.18 ± 0.76 postoperatively, and the AOFAS score improved from 52.41 ± 5.23 to 93.29 ± 3.91 (both P < 0.05), indicating statistical significance. However, changes in the MLAA, NH/FL and AI were not statistically significant. Apart from age differences (49.04 ± 4.41 vs. 34.56 ± 3.13), no significant differences in other scores were observed between the calcaneal spur group and the non-calcaneal spur group at the final follow-up. Moreover, compared to the methods reported in other studies, our study demonstrated a shorter operative time and superior pain and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual medial deep fascia approach for endoscopic plantar fascia release is a safe, quick, effective, and minimally invasive technique that yields favourable clinical outcomes. It has certain advantages compared to other techniques. The presence of calcaneal spurs does not impact postoperative outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1373-1385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075328/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06499-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06499-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨经改良双内侧深筋膜入路内镜下足底筋膜松解术治疗难治性足底筋膜炎的临床疗效。方法:对34例难治性足底筋膜炎患者进行回顾性研究,经改良双内侧深筋膜入路行内镜下足底筋膜松解术。其中并发跟骨刺25例。所有患者至少随访12个月。功能结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和美国矫形足踝学会(AOFAS)评分进行评估,结构评估包括内侧纵弓角(MLAA)、舟骨结节高尺比(NH/FL)和足弓指数(AI)。并分析有与无跟骨刺患者的差异。结果:所有患者均完成了至少12个月的随访,所有病例的伤口均初步愈合。2例患者出现一过性足底皮肤麻木和小脚趾外展困难,3个月内消退。VAS评分由术前的6.53±1.19分降至术后的1.18±0.76分,AOFAS评分由52.41±5.23分降至93.29±3.91分(P均为P)。结论:双内侧深筋膜入路行内镜下足底筋膜松解术安全、快速、有效、微创,临床效果良好。与其他技术相比,它具有一定的优势。跟骨刺的存在不影响术后结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic plantar fascia release via dual medial deep fascia approach for refractory plantar fasciitis: an effective, safe, and rapid surgical approach.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach for the treatment of refractory plantar fasciitis.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 34 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis treated by endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach. Among them, 25 patients had concurrent calcaneal spurs. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, while structural evaluations included the Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle (MLAA), navicular tuberosity height-to-foot length ratio (NH/FL), and the Arch Index (AI). Differences between patients with and without calcaneal spurs were also analyzed.

Results: All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up, with primary wound healing in all cases. Two patients experienced transient plantar skin numbness and small toe abduction difficulty, which resolved within three months. The VAS score decreased significantly from 6.53 ± 1.19 preoperatively to 1.18 ± 0.76 postoperatively, and the AOFAS score improved from 52.41 ± 5.23 to 93.29 ± 3.91 (both P < 0.05), indicating statistical significance. However, changes in the MLAA, NH/FL and AI were not statistically significant. Apart from age differences (49.04 ± 4.41 vs. 34.56 ± 3.13), no significant differences in other scores were observed between the calcaneal spur group and the non-calcaneal spur group at the final follow-up. Moreover, compared to the methods reported in other studies, our study demonstrated a shorter operative time and superior pain and functional outcomes.

Conclusion: The dual medial deep fascia approach for endoscopic plantar fascia release is a safe, quick, effective, and minimally invasive technique that yields favourable clinical outcomes. It has certain advantages compared to other techniques. The presence of calcaneal spurs does not impact postoperative outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and imaging factors associated with paraplegia at presentation in thoracic spinal tuberculosis. Large supine-to-standing posterior pelvic tilt is associated with spinopelvic stiffness in candidates for total hip arthroplasty. Rate of functional recovery after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: patient-reported outcomes at three, six, and twelve months. Intraosseous bone marrow concentrate delays total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: A fifteen year matched cohort study with dose-response analysis. Factors associated with achieving knee flexion around one hundred and twenty five degrees and numerical rating scale around one at one year after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1