内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术的结果:阻塞程度和术前泪囊造影的作用。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011176
Seon Woo Kim, Hong Gee Roh, Hyun Jin Shin
{"title":"内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术的结果:阻塞程度和术前泪囊造影的作用。","authors":"Seon Woo Kim, Hong Gee Roh, Hyun Jin Shin","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) by analyzing preoperative dacryocystography (DCG) findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 304 cases involving 197 patients. The following 6 obstruction levels on DCG were categorized: (1) patent, (2) canaliculus, (3) common canaliculus, (4) lacrimal sac, (5) duct-sac junction, and (6) nasolacrimal duct obstructions. Obstructions within the canaliculus and common canaliculus were defined as proximal obstructions, while those beyond the common canaliculus were classified as distal obstructions. The authors defined the following 2 types of success: (1) complete success, characterized by a patent ostium with no symptom of epiphora; and (2) favorable success, defined as a patent ostium with at least 50% symptom improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of complete success varied with DCG findings, being 52.9% for patent cases and 65.5%, 70.7%, 78.9%, 81.3%, and 82.0% for canaliculus, common canaliculus, lacrimal sac, duct-sac junction, and nasolacrimal duct obstructions, respectively. The complete-success rate was lower in proximal than distal obstructions ( P =0.042). However, the favorable-success rate was 84.3% in the patent group and 94.1% for proximal obstructions, and did not differ with the DCG findings. In addition, a narrower lacrimal sac on DCG was associated with worse outcomes ( P =0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings such as a small lacrimal sac indicating contracture, proximal obstructions, and patency on DCG were identified as predictors of worse surgical outcomes. However, endoscopic DCR often produces favorable outcomes even in cases with patency and proximal obstructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"e532-e536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Outcomes: The Role of Obstruction Levels and Preoperative Dacryocystography.\",\"authors\":\"Seon Woo Kim, Hong Gee Roh, Hyun Jin Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) by analyzing preoperative dacryocystography (DCG) findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 304 cases involving 197 patients. The following 6 obstruction levels on DCG were categorized: (1) patent, (2) canaliculus, (3) common canaliculus, (4) lacrimal sac, (5) duct-sac junction, and (6) nasolacrimal duct obstructions. Obstructions within the canaliculus and common canaliculus were defined as proximal obstructions, while those beyond the common canaliculus were classified as distal obstructions. The authors defined the following 2 types of success: (1) complete success, characterized by a patent ostium with no symptom of epiphora; and (2) favorable success, defined as a patent ostium with at least 50% symptom improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of complete success varied with DCG findings, being 52.9% for patent cases and 65.5%, 70.7%, 78.9%, 81.3%, and 82.0% for canaliculus, common canaliculus, lacrimal sac, duct-sac junction, and nasolacrimal duct obstructions, respectively. The complete-success rate was lower in proximal than distal obstructions ( P =0.042). However, the favorable-success rate was 84.3% in the patent group and 94.1% for proximal obstructions, and did not differ with the DCG findings. In addition, a narrower lacrimal sac on DCG was associated with worse outcomes ( P =0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings such as a small lacrimal sac indicating contracture, proximal obstructions, and patency on DCG were identified as predictors of worse surgical outcomes. However, endoscopic DCR often produces favorable outcomes even in cases with patency and proximal obstructions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e532-e536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过分析术前泪囊造影术(DCG)的表现,探讨内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术(DCR)的手术效果。方法:对304例197例患者进行回顾性研究。DCG将梗阻分为以下6个级别:(1)未闭梗阻,(2)小管梗阻,(3)总小管梗阻,(4)泪囊梗阻,(5)泪囊梗阻,(6)鼻泪管梗阻。小管和总小管内的阻塞被定义为近端阻塞,而总小管外的阻塞被分类为远端阻塞。作者定义了以下两种类型的成功:(1)完全成功,其特征是口未闭,无显泪症状;(2)良好的成功,定义为开口通畅,症状改善至少50%。结果:不同的DCG表现,专利病例的成功率为52.9%,小管、总小管、泪囊、管囊连接、鼻泪管阻塞的成功率分别为65.5%、70.7%、78.9%、81.3%、82.0%。近端梗阻的完全成功率低于远端梗阻(P=0.042)。然而,专利组的良好成功率为84.3%,近端梗阻为94.1%,与DCG结果没有差异。此外,DCG上泪囊变窄与预后较差相关(P=0.045)。结论:小泪囊显示挛缩、近端梗阻和DCG显示通畅被认为是较差手术结果的预测因素。然而,即使在通畅和近端梗阻的情况下,内镜下DCR通常也能产生良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Outcomes: The Role of Obstruction Levels and Preoperative Dacryocystography.

Purpose: To determine the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) by analyzing preoperative dacryocystography (DCG) findings.

Methods: This retrospective study included 304 cases involving 197 patients. The following 6 obstruction levels on DCG were categorized: (1) patent, (2) canaliculus, (3) common canaliculus, (4) lacrimal sac, (5) duct-sac junction, and (6) nasolacrimal duct obstructions. Obstructions within the canaliculus and common canaliculus were defined as proximal obstructions, while those beyond the common canaliculus were classified as distal obstructions. The authors defined the following 2 types of success: (1) complete success, characterized by a patent ostium with no symptom of epiphora; and (2) favorable success, defined as a patent ostium with at least 50% symptom improvement.

Results: The rate of complete success varied with DCG findings, being 52.9% for patent cases and 65.5%, 70.7%, 78.9%, 81.3%, and 82.0% for canaliculus, common canaliculus, lacrimal sac, duct-sac junction, and nasolacrimal duct obstructions, respectively. The complete-success rate was lower in proximal than distal obstructions ( P =0.042). However, the favorable-success rate was 84.3% in the patent group and 94.1% for proximal obstructions, and did not differ with the DCG findings. In addition, a narrower lacrimal sac on DCG was associated with worse outcomes ( P =0.045).

Conclusions: Findings such as a small lacrimal sac indicating contracture, proximal obstructions, and patency on DCG were identified as predictors of worse surgical outcomes. However, endoscopic DCR often produces favorable outcomes even in cases with patency and proximal obstructions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Surgical Technique for Deep Concha, a Pseudomeatus, and High Projection in Congenital Auricular Reconstruction. Secondary Nasolabial Aesthetic Revision After Cleft Lip Surgery: A Narrative Review of Scar-Related Deformity and Subunit Reconstruction. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Zygomatic Complex Fracture Reduction and Orbital Volume Restoration Using A Full Digital Workflow Versus Conventional Protocol: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Craniofacial Keloid Management Using Split-Thickness Skin Grafting and Postexcisional Adjuvant Brachytherapy. Association of Cleft Phenotype Severity With Childhood Secondary Nasal Intervention Burden and Airway Morbidity Following Primary Cheilorhinoplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1