术中基于超声的自动刚性图像融合用于术前MRI更新神经导航的临床验证。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Operative Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1227/ons.0000000000001519
Aliasgar V Moiyadi, Prakash Shetty, Vikas Singh, Chandrima Biswas, Lakshay Raheja, Amitkumar J Choudhari, Miguel Araque Caballero, Susanne Hager, Patrick Hiepe
{"title":"术中基于超声的自动刚性图像融合用于术前MRI更新神经导航的临床验证。","authors":"Aliasgar V Moiyadi, Prakash Shetty, Vikas Singh, Chandrima Biswas, Lakshay Raheja, Amitkumar J Choudhari, Miguel Araque Caballero, Susanne Hager, Patrick Hiepe","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>MRI-based neuronavigation may suffer from inaccuracies that can be compensated by navigated 3D intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) and applying MRI-iUS rigid image fusion (RIF). In this work, such an automated application is evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five adult patients with gliomas were enrolled and underwent resection using navigated iUS. Intraoperative evaluation and postoperative quantification [ie, measurement of the target registration error (TRE)] were conducted to assess the accuracy of registration-based fusion and automated RIF at various stages of surgery [before dura opening (BDO), after dura opening (ADO), after partial resection (APR), after completion of resection (ACR)]. Linear mixed models were used to assess and analyze TRE and the effect of patient- and tumor-related factors on the performance of the RIF. Furthermore, the TRE was measured after applying different prealignments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 79 MRI-iUS data sets derived from 24 patients and enriched with 600 anatomic landmark pairs were evaluated. Overall, RIF resulted in a significantly reduced mean TRE compared with registration-based fusion (from 4.7 mm to 3.5 mm, P < .002). This difference in TRE was dependent on the stage of surgery, being significant for BDO, ADO, and APR stages, but not ACR. It was independent of any tumor-related factors. Simulation tests showed that RIF can significantly improve TRE for a range of ±15 mm prealignment accuracy with highest effect for BDO and ADO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RIF using intraoperative navigated ultrasound improves registration accuracy for intra-axial tumor surgeries. It shows reliable results not only for preresection stages but also partially for later surgical stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"639-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Validation of Intraoperative Ultrasound-Based Automated Rigid Image Fusion to Update Neuronavigation Using Preoperative MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Aliasgar V Moiyadi, Prakash Shetty, Vikas Singh, Chandrima Biswas, Lakshay Raheja, Amitkumar J Choudhari, Miguel Araque Caballero, Susanne Hager, Patrick Hiepe\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>MRI-based neuronavigation may suffer from inaccuracies that can be compensated by navigated 3D intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) and applying MRI-iUS rigid image fusion (RIF). In this work, such an automated application is evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five adult patients with gliomas were enrolled and underwent resection using navigated iUS. Intraoperative evaluation and postoperative quantification [ie, measurement of the target registration error (TRE)] were conducted to assess the accuracy of registration-based fusion and automated RIF at various stages of surgery [before dura opening (BDO), after dura opening (ADO), after partial resection (APR), after completion of resection (ACR)]. Linear mixed models were used to assess and analyze TRE and the effect of patient- and tumor-related factors on the performance of the RIF. Furthermore, the TRE was measured after applying different prealignments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 79 MRI-iUS data sets derived from 24 patients and enriched with 600 anatomic landmark pairs were evaluated. Overall, RIF resulted in a significantly reduced mean TRE compared with registration-based fusion (from 4.7 mm to 3.5 mm, P < .002). This difference in TRE was dependent on the stage of surgery, being significant for BDO, ADO, and APR stages, but not ACR. It was independent of any tumor-related factors. Simulation tests showed that RIF can significantly improve TRE for a range of ±15 mm prealignment accuracy with highest effect for BDO and ADO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RIF using intraoperative navigated ultrasound improves registration accuracy for intra-axial tumor surgeries. It shows reliable results not only for preresection stages but also partially for later surgical stages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"639-650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:基于mri的神经导航可能存在不准确性,可通过导航3D术中超声(iUS)和应用MRI-iUS刚性图像融合(RIF)来补偿。在本工作中,将评估这样一个自动化应用程序。方法:选取25例成年胶质瘤患者,采用导航iUS进行手术切除。进行术中评估和术后量化[即靶配准误差(TRE)测量],以评估手术各阶段[硬脑膜开放前(BDO),硬脑膜开放后(ADO),部分切除后(APR),完成切除后(ACR)]基于配准融合和自动RIF的准确性。使用线性混合模型来评估和分析TRE以及患者和肿瘤相关因素对RIF性能的影响。此外,在应用不同的预对准后,测量了TRE。结果:总共评估了来自24例患者的79个MRI-iUS数据集,并丰富了600个解剖地标对。总体而言,与基于配准的融合相比,RIF显著降低了平均TRE(从4.7 mm降至3.5 mm, P < 0.002)。TRE的差异取决于手术分期,在BDO、ADO和APR分期显著,但在ACR分期不显著。它独立于任何肿瘤相关因素。模拟试验表明,RIF可以显著提高预对准精度(±15 mm),其中对BDO和ADO效果最好。结论:术中导航超声应用RIF可提高轴内肿瘤手术的定位精度。它显示了可靠的结果,不仅在切除前阶段,但部分较晚的手术阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Validation of Intraoperative Ultrasound-Based Automated Rigid Image Fusion to Update Neuronavigation Using Preoperative MRI.

Background and objectives: MRI-based neuronavigation may suffer from inaccuracies that can be compensated by navigated 3D intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) and applying MRI-iUS rigid image fusion (RIF). In this work, such an automated application is evaluated.

Methods: Twenty-five adult patients with gliomas were enrolled and underwent resection using navigated iUS. Intraoperative evaluation and postoperative quantification [ie, measurement of the target registration error (TRE)] were conducted to assess the accuracy of registration-based fusion and automated RIF at various stages of surgery [before dura opening (BDO), after dura opening (ADO), after partial resection (APR), after completion of resection (ACR)]. Linear mixed models were used to assess and analyze TRE and the effect of patient- and tumor-related factors on the performance of the RIF. Furthermore, the TRE was measured after applying different prealignments.

Results: In total, 79 MRI-iUS data sets derived from 24 patients and enriched with 600 anatomic landmark pairs were evaluated. Overall, RIF resulted in a significantly reduced mean TRE compared with registration-based fusion (from 4.7 mm to 3.5 mm, P < .002). This difference in TRE was dependent on the stage of surgery, being significant for BDO, ADO, and APR stages, but not ACR. It was independent of any tumor-related factors. Simulation tests showed that RIF can significantly improve TRE for a range of ±15 mm prealignment accuracy with highest effect for BDO and ADO.

Conclusions: RIF using intraoperative navigated ultrasound improves registration accuracy for intra-axial tumor surgeries. It shows reliable results not only for preresection stages but also partially for later surgical stages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
期刊最新文献
Modified Posterior Petrosal Approach for Microsurgical Resection of a Retrochiasmatic Craniopharyngioma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Anterior Temporal and Transcavernous Approach for Clipping of an Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Applicability of a Dexterity-Enhancing Handheld Robot for 360° Endoscopic Skull Base Approaches: An Exploratory Cadaver Study. Simulation of a Remote Robotic Endovascular Thrombectomy. Recurrent Large Vessel Occlusion After Successful Recanalization From Mechanical Thrombectomy: Risk Factors and Outcomes After Repeat Mechanical Thrombectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1