随机试验-治疗试验中限制不一致对随机化的基于总成功率的样本量重新计算。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02410-3
Caroline Elzner, Amra Pepić, Oke Gerke, Antonia Zapf
{"title":"随机试验-治疗试验中限制不一致对随机化的基于总成功率的样本量重新计算。","authors":"Caroline Elzner, Amra Pepić, Oke Gerke, Antonia Zapf","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02410-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized test-treatment studies are performed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests by assessing patient-relevant outcomes. The assumptions for a sample size calculation for such studies are often uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An adaptive design with a blinded sample size recalculation based on the overall success rate in a randomized test-treatment trial with restricting randomization to discordant pairs is proposed and evaluated by a simulation study. The results of the adaptive design are compared to those of the fixed design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The empirical type I error rate is sufficiently controlled in the adaptive design as well as in the fixed design and the estimates are unbiased. The adaptive design achieves the desired theoretical power, whereas the fixed design tends to be over- or under-powered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It may be advisable to consider blinded recalculation of sample size in a randomized test-treatment study with restriction of randomization to discordant pairs in order to improve the conduct of the study. However, there are a number of study-related limitations that affect the implementation of the method which need to be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sample size recalculation based on the overall success rate in a randomized test-treatment trial with restricting randomization to discordant pairs.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Elzner, Amra Pepić, Oke Gerke, Antonia Zapf\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02410-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized test-treatment studies are performed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests by assessing patient-relevant outcomes. The assumptions for a sample size calculation for such studies are often uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An adaptive design with a blinded sample size recalculation based on the overall success rate in a randomized test-treatment trial with restricting randomization to discordant pairs is proposed and evaluated by a simulation study. The results of the adaptive design are compared to those of the fixed design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The empirical type I error rate is sufficiently controlled in the adaptive design as well as in the fixed design and the estimates are unbiased. The adaptive design achieves the desired theoretical power, whereas the fixed design tends to be over- or under-powered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It may be advisable to consider blinded recalculation of sample size in a randomized test-treatment study with restriction of randomization to discordant pairs in order to improve the conduct of the study. However, there are a number of study-related limitations that affect the implementation of the method which need to be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02410-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02410-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:进行随机试验-治疗研究,通过评估患者相关结果来评估诊断试验的临床有效性。这类研究的样本量计算的假设通常是不确定的。方法:提出了一种基于随机试验治疗试验总体成功率的盲法样本量重新计算的自适应设计,并通过模拟研究对不一致对的随机化进行了评估。将自适应设计的结果与固定设计的结果进行了比较。结果:在自适应设计和固定设计中,经验I型错误率得到了充分控制,估计是无偏的。自适应设计达到了期望的理论功率,而固定设计往往是功率过高或过低。结论:在随机试验-治疗研究中,考虑盲法重新计算样本量,限制随机化到不一致的对,以改善研究的进行。然而,有一些与研究相关的限制会影响该方法的实施,需要加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sample size recalculation based on the overall success rate in a randomized test-treatment trial with restricting randomization to discordant pairs.

Background: Randomized test-treatment studies are performed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests by assessing patient-relevant outcomes. The assumptions for a sample size calculation for such studies are often uncertain.

Methods: An adaptive design with a blinded sample size recalculation based on the overall success rate in a randomized test-treatment trial with restricting randomization to discordant pairs is proposed and evaluated by a simulation study. The results of the adaptive design are compared to those of the fixed design.

Results: The empirical type I error rate is sufficiently controlled in the adaptive design as well as in the fixed design and the estimates are unbiased. The adaptive design achieves the desired theoretical power, whereas the fixed design tends to be over- or under-powered.

Conclusions: It may be advisable to consider blinded recalculation of sample size in a randomized test-treatment study with restriction of randomization to discordant pairs in order to improve the conduct of the study. However, there are a number of study-related limitations that affect the implementation of the method which need to be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data. Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data. Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data. Comparative evaluation of interrupted time series analytical methods for healthcare quality improvement research: a Monte Carlo simulation study. An interpretable XGboost algorithm for predicting 30-day mortality in acute pancreatitis using routine biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1