IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Australasian Emergency Care Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.001
Wayne Varndell, Matthew Lutze, Carrie Janerka
{"title":"Developing practice-level quality indicators to assist in evaluating the application of the Australasian Triage Scale: A modified e-Delphi process.","authors":"Wayne Varndell, Matthew Lutze, Carrie Janerka","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Triage quality is central to patient safety and the efficient distribution of emergency department resources. Currently, there are no identified quality indicators for application of the Australasian Triage Scale.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To address a gap in quality indicators specific to triage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A literature review and modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A review of the literature published between 2001 and 2024 was conducted to identify potential indicators and metrics of triage quality, and were categorised across six quality of care domains (patient-centeredness, timeliness, effectiveness, equity, efficiency and safety). Three consecutive online surveys where panellists rated these indicators for perceived appropriateness, validity and feasibility were completed between August and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the review, 17 initial quality indicators across six quality of care domains were developed. Following round 1, 3 indicators were modified and 8 indicators were added. After two further survey rounds, 18 (72 %) indicators met consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An expert panel validated a set of triage quality indicators for measuring Australian triage practice. A continuous quality improvement approach is required to optimise triage practice, develop processes for detecting and reducing patient harm and minimising variation. Further research is needed to test applicability of the indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:分诊质量对患者安全和急诊科资源的有效分配至关重要。目前,澳大拉西亚分诊量表的应用还没有确定的质量指标。目的:填补分诊质量指标方面的空白:设计:文献综述和改良德尔菲技术:对 2001 年至 2024 年间发表的文献进行回顾,以确定分诊质量的潜在指标和衡量标准,并在六个护理质量领域(以患者为中心、及时性、有效性、公平性、效率和安全性)进行分类。2023 年 8 月至 12 月期间,连续完成了三项在线调查,由小组成员对这些指标的适当性、有效性和可行性进行评分:根据审查结果,制定了 17 个初步质量指标,涵盖 6 个护理质量领域。第一轮调查后,修改了 3 项指标,增加了 8 项指标。再经过两轮调查后,18 项指标(72%)达成共识:专家小组验证了一套用于衡量澳大利亚分诊实践的分诊质量指标。需要采取持续的质量改进方法来优化分诊实践,制定检测和减少患者伤害的流程,并最大限度地减少差异。需要进一步开展研究,以检验这些指标的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing practice-level quality indicators to assist in evaluating the application of the Australasian Triage Scale: A modified e-Delphi process.

Background: Triage quality is central to patient safety and the efficient distribution of emergency department resources. Currently, there are no identified quality indicators for application of the Australasian Triage Scale.

Aim: To address a gap in quality indicators specific to triage.

Design: A literature review and modified Delphi technique.

Method: A review of the literature published between 2001 and 2024 was conducted to identify potential indicators and metrics of triage quality, and were categorised across six quality of care domains (patient-centeredness, timeliness, effectiveness, equity, efficiency and safety). Three consecutive online surveys where panellists rated these indicators for perceived appropriateness, validity and feasibility were completed between August and December 2023.

Results: From the review, 17 initial quality indicators across six quality of care domains were developed. Following round 1, 3 indicators were modified and 8 indicators were added. After two further survey rounds, 18 (72 %) indicators met consensus.

Conclusion: An expert panel validated a set of triage quality indicators for measuring Australian triage practice. A continuous quality improvement approach is required to optimise triage practice, develop processes for detecting and reducing patient harm and minimising variation. Further research is needed to test applicability of the indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Developing practice-level quality indicators to assist in evaluating the application of the Australasian Triage Scale: A modified e-Delphi process. Screening and assessment of falls risk in the emergency department. The impact of emergency nurse practitioners on short-term survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Mitigating conflict between emergency department and inpatient staff due to access block. Effects of cold needle and ShotBlocker applied in the emergency department on pain and satisfaction in intramuscular injection pain: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1