Jefferson L. Santana, Till Enzner, Britney Blunderfield, Asher A. Mendelson, Rodrigo Villar
{"title":"开发一种标准化的单次心肺运动试验,用于联合评估峰值摄氧量和开/关动力学。","authors":"Jefferson L. Santana, Till Enzner, Britney Blunderfield, Asher A. Mendelson, Rodrigo Villar","doi":"10.1113/EP092337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peak oxygen uptake (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>peak</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> on/off-kinetics are key indicators of exercise capacity and health outcomes, but their assessment often requires separate laboratory visits, which limits feasibility. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a single cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for both assessments. We designed a single-session combined CPET protocol using an upright cycle ergometer in healthy volunteers (<i>n </i>= 20). <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>peak</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> was first estimated using an a priori formula. The constant work rate (CWR) part of the test (on-kinetics) was set to an intensity of 30% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>reserve</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{reserve}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. After an incremental test to measure <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>peak</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, a 10-min recovery period was used to evaluate off-kinetics. Twenty volunteers (9 females and 11 males), 28.0 ± 8.1 years completed the protocol. No significant differences were found between predicted and measured <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>peak</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (<i>P </i>= 0.47). A strong correlation (<i>r </i>= 0.88) and good agreement (Bland–Altman bias = −0.82 mL kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) were found between the calculated/actual individuals’ 30% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>reserve</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{reserve}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (mL kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) and the measured steady-state <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> at CWR. The measured exercise intensity at CWR closely matched the target of 30%, with no statistical differences, with an average difference of 0.2 percentage points. Small–medium Cohen's <i>d</i> (0.16) indicated high similarity between predicted and measured <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>peak</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> on- and off-kinetics analyses were also performed for all participants with mono-exponential fittings. A single-session protocol for the combined assessment of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>peak</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> on/off-kinetics was developed. This protocol will enable greater recruitment and participation in research and enhanced detail for clinical CPET use. Future research should evaluate intra- and inter-participant reproducibility over repeated sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":"110 9","pages":"1271-1282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/EP092337","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a standardized single-session cardiopulmonary exercise test for combined assessment of peak oxygen uptake and on/off-kinetics\",\"authors\":\"Jefferson L. Santana, Till Enzner, Britney Blunderfield, Asher A. Mendelson, Rodrigo Villar\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP092337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Peak oxygen uptake (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>peak</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> on/off-kinetics are key indicators of exercise capacity and health outcomes, but their assessment often requires separate laboratory visits, which limits feasibility. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a single cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for both assessments. We designed a single-session combined CPET protocol using an upright cycle ergometer in healthy volunteers (<i>n </i>= 20). <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>peak</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> was first estimated using an a priori formula. The constant work rate (CWR) part of the test (on-kinetics) was set to an intensity of 30% <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>reserve</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{reserve}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. After an incremental test to measure <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>peak</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, a 10-min recovery period was used to evaluate off-kinetics. Twenty volunteers (9 females and 11 males), 28.0 ± 8.1 years completed the protocol. No significant differences were found between predicted and measured <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>peak</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> (<i>P </i>= 0.47). A strong correlation (<i>r </i>= 0.88) and good agreement (Bland–Altman bias = −0.82 mL kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) were found between the calculated/actual individuals’ 30% <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>reserve</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{reserve}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> (mL kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) and the measured steady-state <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> at CWR. The measured exercise intensity at CWR closely matched the target of 30%, with no statistical differences, with an average difference of 0.2 percentage points. Small–medium Cohen's <i>d</i> (0.16) indicated high similarity between predicted and measured <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>peak</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> on- and off-kinetics analyses were also performed for all participants with mono-exponential fittings. A single-session protocol for the combined assessment of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mi>peak</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mo>̇</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{\\\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> on/off-kinetics was developed. This protocol will enable greater recruitment and participation in research and enhanced detail for clinical CPET use. Future research should evaluate intra- and inter-participant reproducibility over repeated sessions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\"110 9\",\"pages\":\"1271-1282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/EP092337\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP092337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP092337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
耗氧量峰值(V O 2峰值${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}} _2}{\mathrm{Peak}}}}$)和V O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}} _2}}}$开/关动力学是运动能力和健康结果的关键指标,但它们的评估往往需要单独的实验室访问,这限制了可行性。本横断面研究旨在开发一种用于两种评估的单一心肺运动试验(CPET)。我们在健康志愿者(n = 20)中设计了单次联合CPET方案,使用直立循环测力仪。首先用一个先验公式估计了V²峰值${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$。恒功速率(CWR)部分(on-kinetics)设定为30%的V (O) 2储备${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}} _2}{\mathrm{reserve}}}}$。在进行增量测试以测量V (O) 2峰值${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{峰值}}}}$后,使用10分钟的恢复期来评估非动力学。20名志愿者(女性9名,男性11名),年龄28.0±8.1岁。预测值与实测值${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}} _2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$之间无显著差异(P = 0.47)。结果表明,计算值与实际值之间存在较强的相关性(r = 0.88)和较好的一致性(Bland-Altman偏差= -0.82 mL kg-1 min-1),计算值与实际值之间存在较强的相关性(r = 0.88),计算值与实际值之间存在较强的相关性(r = 0.88),计算值与实际值之间存在较好的相关性(r = 0.82 mL kg-1 min-1)。CWR测量的运动强度与30%的目标非常接近,没有统计学差异,平均差异为0.2个百分点。中小型Cohen’s d(0.16)表明预测值与实测值之间具有较高的相似性${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\ mathm {O}}}_2}{\ mathm {peak}}}}$。对于所有具有单指数拟合的参与者,也进行了V * O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\ maththrm {O}}}}}}$的开、关动力学分析。建立了一种单会话协议,用于综合评估V (O) 2峰${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{峰}}}}$和V (O) 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}} $开/关动力学。该协议将使更多的招募和参与研究,并加强临床CPET使用的细节。未来的研究应该在重复的疗程中评估参与者内部和参与者之间的可重复性。
Development of a standardized single-session cardiopulmonary exercise test for combined assessment of peak oxygen uptake and on/off-kinetics
Peak oxygen uptake () and on/off-kinetics are key indicators of exercise capacity and health outcomes, but their assessment often requires separate laboratory visits, which limits feasibility. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a single cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for both assessments. We designed a single-session combined CPET protocol using an upright cycle ergometer in healthy volunteers (n = 20). was first estimated using an a priori formula. The constant work rate (CWR) part of the test (on-kinetics) was set to an intensity of 30% . After an incremental test to measure , a 10-min recovery period was used to evaluate off-kinetics. Twenty volunteers (9 females and 11 males), 28.0 ± 8.1 years completed the protocol. No significant differences were found between predicted and measured (P = 0.47). A strong correlation (r = 0.88) and good agreement (Bland–Altman bias = −0.82 mL kg−1 min−1) were found between the calculated/actual individuals’ 30% (mL kg−1 min−1) and the measured steady-state at CWR. The measured exercise intensity at CWR closely matched the target of 30%, with no statistical differences, with an average difference of 0.2 percentage points. Small–medium Cohen's d (0.16) indicated high similarity between predicted and measured . on- and off-kinetics analyses were also performed for all participants with mono-exponential fittings. A single-session protocol for the combined assessment of and on/off-kinetics was developed. This protocol will enable greater recruitment and participation in research and enhanced detail for clinical CPET use. Future research should evaluate intra- and inter-participant reproducibility over repeated sessions.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.