使用庆大霉素-胶原海绵预防植入式心律转复除颤器患者感染的效果--单中心 ICD 登记观察研究的结果。

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1963
Thomas Kleemann MD , Babak Mousavi MD , Kleopatra Kouraki MD , Margit Strauss MD , Anne-Rike Wenz MD , Ahmet Enes Öztürk MD , Udo Weisse MD , Christiane Werling MD , Falk-Udo Sack MD , Ralf Zahn MD
{"title":"使用庆大霉素-胶原海绵预防植入式心律转复除颤器患者感染的效果--单中心 ICD 登记观察研究的结果。","authors":"Thomas Kleemann MD ,&nbsp;Babak Mousavi MD ,&nbsp;Kleopatra Kouraki MD ,&nbsp;Margit Strauss MD ,&nbsp;Anne-Rike Wenz MD ,&nbsp;Ahmet Enes Öztürk MD ,&nbsp;Udo Weisse MD ,&nbsp;Christiane Werling MD ,&nbsp;Falk-Udo Sack MD ,&nbsp;Ralf Zahn MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the obvious benefits, the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is associated with serious complications, including infections. In particular, device replacement or revision procedures are associated with an increased risk of infection.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the study was to compare the cardiac device infection rate with and without the use of a gentamycin-collagen sponge (GCS) in patients undergoing device replacement or revision procedures of implanted ICDs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 507 consecutive ICD patients from a prospective single-center ICD registry who underwent elective device replacement, system upgrade, or lead revision between 2017 and April 2024 were analyzed. From September 2020 onwards a GCS was inserted into the device pocket (GCS group, n = 277). These patients were compared with patients who underwent surgery between 2017 and August 2020 (control group, n = 230).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. The GCS was well tolerated, and no complications were associated with the GCS. The Kaplan-Meier estimated infection rate after 1 year was 0.7% in the GCS group and 3.9% in the control group (<em>P</em> = .005). The use of the GCS was an independent predictor for a lower device infection rate during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–0.84).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The additional use of a GCS was associated with a lower incidence of device infections than standard-of-care infection prevention strategies alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 418-423"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of a gentamycin-collagen sponge to prevent infections in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing device replacement or lead revision: Results of a monocentric ICD registry observational study\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Kleemann MD ,&nbsp;Babak Mousavi MD ,&nbsp;Kleopatra Kouraki MD ,&nbsp;Margit Strauss MD ,&nbsp;Anne-Rike Wenz MD ,&nbsp;Ahmet Enes Öztürk MD ,&nbsp;Udo Weisse MD ,&nbsp;Christiane Werling MD ,&nbsp;Falk-Udo Sack MD ,&nbsp;Ralf Zahn MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the obvious benefits, the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is associated with serious complications, including infections. In particular, device replacement or revision procedures are associated with an increased risk of infection.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the study was to compare the cardiac device infection rate with and without the use of a gentamycin-collagen sponge (GCS) in patients undergoing device replacement or revision procedures of implanted ICDs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 507 consecutive ICD patients from a prospective single-center ICD registry who underwent elective device replacement, system upgrade, or lead revision between 2017 and April 2024 were analyzed. From September 2020 onwards a GCS was inserted into the device pocket (GCS group, n = 277). These patients were compared with patients who underwent surgery between 2017 and August 2020 (control group, n = 230).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. The GCS was well tolerated, and no complications were associated with the GCS. The Kaplan-Meier estimated infection rate after 1 year was 0.7% in the GCS group and 3.9% in the control group (<em>P</em> = .005). The use of the GCS was an independent predictor for a lower device infection rate during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–0.84).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The additional use of a GCS was associated with a lower incidence of device infections than standard-of-care infection prevention strategies alone.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 418-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125022003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125022003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有明显的好处,但使用植入式心律转复除颤器(ICDs)与严重的并发症相关,包括感染。特别是,器械更换或翻修手术与感染风险增加有关。目的:本研究的目的是比较使用庆大霉素-胶原蛋白海绵(GCS)和不使用庆大霉素-胶原蛋白海绵(GCS)的心脏装置感染率在接受植入式icd更换或翻修手术的患者中。方法:分析2017年至2024年4月期间,来自前瞻性单中心ICD注册中心的507例连续ICD患者进行选择性器械更换、系统升级或导联修改。从2020年9月起,将GCS插入设备口袋(GCS组,n = 277)。将这些患者与2017年至2020年8月间接受手术的患者进行比较(对照组,n = 230)。结果:两组患者的基线特征相似。GCS耐受性良好,无GCS相关并发症。Kaplan-Meier估计一年后GCS组的感染率为0.7%,对照组为3.9% (p = 0.005)。GCS的使用是随访期间器械感染率较低的独立预测因子(HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.84)。结论:与单独使用标准护理感染预防策略相比,额外使用GCS与器械感染发生率较低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of a gentamycin-collagen sponge to prevent infections in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing device replacement or lead revision: Results of a monocentric ICD registry observational study

Background

Despite the obvious benefits, the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is associated with serious complications, including infections. In particular, device replacement or revision procedures are associated with an increased risk of infection.

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the cardiac device infection rate with and without the use of a gentamycin-collagen sponge (GCS) in patients undergoing device replacement or revision procedures of implanted ICDs.

Methods

A total of 507 consecutive ICD patients from a prospective single-center ICD registry who underwent elective device replacement, system upgrade, or lead revision between 2017 and April 2024 were analyzed. From September 2020 onwards a GCS was inserted into the device pocket (GCS group, n = 277). These patients were compared with patients who underwent surgery between 2017 and August 2020 (control group, n = 230).

Results

The baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. The GCS was well tolerated, and no complications were associated with the GCS. The Kaplan-Meier estimated infection rate after 1 year was 0.7% in the GCS group and 3.9% in the control group (P = .005). The use of the GCS was an independent predictor for a lower device infection rate during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–0.84).

Conclusion

The additional use of a GCS was associated with a lower incidence of device infections than standard-of-care infection prevention strategies alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Rare Complications of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Systematic Review of Case-Based Evidence. REAL-WORLD MANAGEMENT AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER THE FIRST HOSPITALIZATION FOR SUSTAINED VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY PREVENTION IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS: A GLOBAL COHORT ANALYSIS. Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation Polygenic Risk Scores for the Prediction of Arrhythmia Recurrence after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. Exercise stress testing in the prediction of sudden cardiac arrest associated with mitral valve prolapse. Completely Wireless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Biventricular Leadless Pacing to Remedy Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1