腹外CT成像显示需要紧急腹部手术的高龄患者病情严重程度增加。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116297
Lavina Malhotra , Andrew H. Stephen , Madeline Goosman , Adam R. Aluisio , Mohammed Arafeh , Charles A. Adams , Stephanie N. Leuckel , Brent Emigh , Benjamin M. Hall , Daithi S. Heffernan
{"title":"腹外CT成像显示需要紧急腹部手术的高龄患者病情严重程度增加。","authors":"Lavina Malhotra ,&nbsp;Andrew H. Stephen ,&nbsp;Madeline Goosman ,&nbsp;Adam R. Aluisio ,&nbsp;Mohammed Arafeh ,&nbsp;Charles A. Adams ,&nbsp;Stephanie N. Leuckel ,&nbsp;Brent Emigh ,&nbsp;Benjamin M. Hall ,&nbsp;Daithi S. Heffernan","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Abdominal sepsis frequently causes neurologic and pulmonary dysfunction among geriatric patients, We hypothesize that patients with abdominal sepsis who undergo extra-abdominal imaging have a greater burden of illness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients 65 years and older that underwent emergency abdominal surgery for sepsis were divided into those with abdominal only(AbdCT) versus abdominal and extra-abdominal(ExtraCT) imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ExtraCT patients(N ​= ​30) compared to AbdCT(N ​= ​97) had higher rates of dementia(13.3 ​% versus 3.3 ​%; p ​= ​0.03), diabetes(93.3 ​% versus 60.1 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01 and COPD(70 ​% versus 29.9 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01) but lower rates of abdominal pain as chief complaint (23.3 ​% versus 81.4 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01) and higher rates of being qSOFA positive (33.3 ​% vs 7.2 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.05). Importantly, time to OR was not different between groups. ExtraCT patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality (33.3 ​% vs 5.2 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01). Extra-abdominal CT imaging was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR ​= ​5.4; 95 %CI ​= ​1.4–20.1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ExtraCT among geriatric patients with abdominal emergencies is a marker of severity of illness and should guide end-of-life decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 116297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extra-abdominal CT imaging indicates increased severity of illness in advanced age patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery\",\"authors\":\"Lavina Malhotra ,&nbsp;Andrew H. Stephen ,&nbsp;Madeline Goosman ,&nbsp;Adam R. Aluisio ,&nbsp;Mohammed Arafeh ,&nbsp;Charles A. Adams ,&nbsp;Stephanie N. Leuckel ,&nbsp;Brent Emigh ,&nbsp;Benjamin M. Hall ,&nbsp;Daithi S. Heffernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Abdominal sepsis frequently causes neurologic and pulmonary dysfunction among geriatric patients, We hypothesize that patients with abdominal sepsis who undergo extra-abdominal imaging have a greater burden of illness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients 65 years and older that underwent emergency abdominal surgery for sepsis were divided into those with abdominal only(AbdCT) versus abdominal and extra-abdominal(ExtraCT) imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ExtraCT patients(N ​= ​30) compared to AbdCT(N ​= ​97) had higher rates of dementia(13.3 ​% versus 3.3 ​%; p ​= ​0.03), diabetes(93.3 ​% versus 60.1 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01 and COPD(70 ​% versus 29.9 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01) but lower rates of abdominal pain as chief complaint (23.3 ​% versus 81.4 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01) and higher rates of being qSOFA positive (33.3 ​% vs 7.2 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.05). Importantly, time to OR was not different between groups. ExtraCT patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality (33.3 ​% vs 5.2 ​%; p ​&lt; ​0.01). Extra-abdominal CT imaging was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR ​= ​5.4; 95 %CI ​= ​1.4–20.1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ExtraCT among geriatric patients with abdominal emergencies is a marker of severity of illness and should guide end-of-life decision making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"244 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001199\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹部败血症在老年患者中经常引起神经和肺功能障碍,我们假设腹部败血症患者接受腹外成像有更大的疾病负担。方法:65岁及以上因脓毒症接受紧急腹部手术的患者分为仅腹部(AbdCT)和腹部及腹外(ExtraCT)成像两组。结果:与AbdCT(N = 97)相比,ExtraCT患者(N = 30)的痴呆率更高(13.3% vs 3.3%;P = 0.03),糖尿病(93.3% vs 60.1%;结论:老年急腹症患者的提取物是疾病严重程度的标志,应指导临终决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extra-abdominal CT imaging indicates increased severity of illness in advanced age patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery

Background

Abdominal sepsis frequently causes neurologic and pulmonary dysfunction among geriatric patients, We hypothesize that patients with abdominal sepsis who undergo extra-abdominal imaging have a greater burden of illness.

Methods

Patients 65 years and older that underwent emergency abdominal surgery for sepsis were divided into those with abdominal only(AbdCT) versus abdominal and extra-abdominal(ExtraCT) imaging.

Results

ExtraCT patients(N ​= ​30) compared to AbdCT(N ​= ​97) had higher rates of dementia(13.3 ​% versus 3.3 ​%; p ​= ​0.03), diabetes(93.3 ​% versus 60.1 ​%; p ​< ​0.01 and COPD(70 ​% versus 29.9 ​%; p ​< ​0.01) but lower rates of abdominal pain as chief complaint (23.3 ​% versus 81.4 ​%; p ​< ​0.01) and higher rates of being qSOFA positive (33.3 ​% vs 7.2 ​%; p ​< ​0.05). Importantly, time to OR was not different between groups. ExtraCT patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality (33.3 ​% vs 5.2 ​%; p ​< ​0.01). Extra-abdominal CT imaging was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR ​= ​5.4; 95 %CI ​= ​1.4–20.1).

Conclusions

ExtraCT among geriatric patients with abdominal emergencies is a marker of severity of illness and should guide end-of-life decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Destructive colon injuries associated with severe pancreatic injuries: Primary anastomosis or ostomy Who is going to perform the operation? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for pediatric patients with abdominal firearm injuries Value capture in surgery: Thoughts on metrics, autonomy, and academic success Military-civilian partnerships in the South Puget Sound: Relationships for healthcare readiness and emergency preparedness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1