Ali Schroeder , Tamir Bresler , Philip Bohlmann , Anjali S. Kumar
{"title":"外科手术是一项观赏性运动吗?在一所社区医学院做三年级外科见习病例记录分析。","authors":"Ali Schroeder , Tamir Bresler , Philip Bohlmann , Anjali S. Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study evaluated a structured case-log assignment to assess experiences in third-year surgical clerkships, focusing on student-preceptor interactions allowing entrustability of the student with surgical instruments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Case-logs from 74 students across multiple clinical sites in a community-based medical school were reviewed. Assignments detailed operation type, hands-on-instrument time, and personal growth reflections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Students logged 1396 operations (65.43 %; 31.07 ± 23.85 surgeries/student), 382 clinic sessions (17.91 %), and 355 rounds/consultations (16.65 %). Common surgeries included intrabdominal (49.78 %) and abdominal wall (15.25 %). Fiberoptic-assisted (45.45 %) and open surgeries (36.82 %) predominated. Most (77.94 %) operations occurred without residents, with limited hands-on time (27.51 % reporting 1 %–24 %). Weekend logs (46 students) captured fewer surgeries (2.22 ± 1.31/student), though intrabdominal surgeries and hands-on time were higher. Reflections highlighted key experiences and learning opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Structured case-logs effectively capture surgical exposure and student experiences. Integrating digital logbooks could enhance real-time data collection and streamline assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 116285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is surgery a spectator sport? Third-year surgical clerkship case-log analysis at a community-based medical college\",\"authors\":\"Ali Schroeder , Tamir Bresler , Philip Bohlmann , Anjali S. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study evaluated a structured case-log assignment to assess experiences in third-year surgical clerkships, focusing on student-preceptor interactions allowing entrustability of the student with surgical instruments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Case-logs from 74 students across multiple clinical sites in a community-based medical school were reviewed. Assignments detailed operation type, hands-on-instrument time, and personal growth reflections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Students logged 1396 operations (65.43 %; 31.07 ± 23.85 surgeries/student), 382 clinic sessions (17.91 %), and 355 rounds/consultations (16.65 %). Common surgeries included intrabdominal (49.78 %) and abdominal wall (15.25 %). Fiberoptic-assisted (45.45 %) and open surgeries (36.82 %) predominated. Most (77.94 %) operations occurred without residents, with limited hands-on time (27.51 % reporting 1 %–24 %). Weekend logs (46 students) captured fewer surgeries (2.22 ± 1.31/student), though intrabdominal surgeries and hands-on time were higher. Reflections highlighted key experiences and learning opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Structured case-logs effectively capture surgical exposure and student experiences. Integrating digital logbooks could enhance real-time data collection and streamline assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"244 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is surgery a spectator sport? Third-year surgical clerkship case-log analysis at a community-based medical college
Background
This study evaluated a structured case-log assignment to assess experiences in third-year surgical clerkships, focusing on student-preceptor interactions allowing entrustability of the student with surgical instruments.
Methods
Case-logs from 74 students across multiple clinical sites in a community-based medical school were reviewed. Assignments detailed operation type, hands-on-instrument time, and personal growth reflections.
Results
Students logged 1396 operations (65.43 %; 31.07 ± 23.85 surgeries/student), 382 clinic sessions (17.91 %), and 355 rounds/consultations (16.65 %). Common surgeries included intrabdominal (49.78 %) and abdominal wall (15.25 %). Fiberoptic-assisted (45.45 %) and open surgeries (36.82 %) predominated. Most (77.94 %) operations occurred without residents, with limited hands-on time (27.51 % reporting 1 %–24 %). Weekend logs (46 students) captured fewer surgeries (2.22 ± 1.31/student), though intrabdominal surgeries and hands-on time were higher. Reflections highlighted key experiences and learning opportunities.
Conclusion
Structured case-logs effectively capture surgical exposure and student experiences. Integrating digital logbooks could enhance real-time data collection and streamline assessment.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.