胃经口幽门肌切开术(GPOP)是所有类型胃轻瘫的有效治疗方法。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102031
Ashley E. Williams, Eldrin Bhanat, Venkata N. Seerapu, John Salvemini, Grace Howell, Mary Michael Evans, Jacob R. Moremen
{"title":"胃经口幽门肌切开术(GPOP)是所有类型胃轻瘫的有效治疗方法。","authors":"Ashley E. Williams,&nbsp;Eldrin Bhanat,&nbsp;Venkata N. Seerapu,&nbsp;John Salvemini,&nbsp;Grace Howell,&nbsp;Mary Michael Evans,&nbsp;Jacob R. Moremen","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy (G-POP) is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for treating refractory gastroparesis (GP). The functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) is an endoscopic tool for measuring the physiologic parameters of the gastrointestinal sphincters. Here, FLIP was used to investigate the association between physiologic measurements of the pylorus and clinical outcomes after G-POP using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) to monitor clinical response.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a single-center prospective study of 48 patients with GP who underwent G-POP for the management of refractory GP. The cross-sectional area, pressure, and distensibility index (DI) of the pylorus were evaluated using FLIP at 40-mL and 50-mL balloon fill volumes pre- and postprocedurally. GCSI scores were used to monitor clinical symptoms both preprocedurally and at 6 weeks after G-POP.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients. GCSI scores (0−5) decreased by an average of 0.95 ± 1.45 points at 6 weeks postoperatively, with the nausea/vomiting and bloating subscales showing the greatest improvement. The change (∆) in DI at 50-mL balloon fill volumes was a statistically significant predictor of symptomatic improvement after the procedure, with ∆DI at 50 mL of &gt;1.5 mm<sup>2</sup>/mm Hg strongly correlated with larger improvements in GCSI (Pearson coefficient: 0.544; <em>P</em> =.036).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The EndoFLIP was not found to be a reliable predictor of clinical success before G-POP. However, measuring changes pre- and postprocedurally can be used to guide management. Additional investigations are needed to elucidate the relationship between physiologic pyloric sphincter measurements and clinical response to G-POP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 6","pages":"Article 102031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy effectiveness in management of all types of gastroparesis\",\"authors\":\"Ashley E. Williams,&nbsp;Eldrin Bhanat,&nbsp;Venkata N. Seerapu,&nbsp;John Salvemini,&nbsp;Grace Howell,&nbsp;Mary Michael Evans,&nbsp;Jacob R. Moremen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy (G-POP) is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for treating refractory gastroparesis (GP). The functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) is an endoscopic tool for measuring the physiologic parameters of the gastrointestinal sphincters. Here, FLIP was used to investigate the association between physiologic measurements of the pylorus and clinical outcomes after G-POP using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) to monitor clinical response.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a single-center prospective study of 48 patients with GP who underwent G-POP for the management of refractory GP. The cross-sectional area, pressure, and distensibility index (DI) of the pylorus were evaluated using FLIP at 40-mL and 50-mL balloon fill volumes pre- and postprocedurally. GCSI scores were used to monitor clinical symptoms both preprocedurally and at 6 weeks after G-POP.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients. GCSI scores (0−5) decreased by an average of 0.95 ± 1.45 points at 6 weeks postoperatively, with the nausea/vomiting and bloating subscales showing the greatest improvement. The change (∆) in DI at 50-mL balloon fill volumes was a statistically significant predictor of symptomatic improvement after the procedure, with ∆DI at 50 mL of &gt;1.5 mm<sup>2</sup>/mm Hg strongly correlated with larger improvements in GCSI (Pearson coefficient: 0.544; <em>P</em> =.036).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The EndoFLIP was not found to be a reliable predictor of clinical success before G-POP. However, measuring changes pre- and postprocedurally can be used to guide management. Additional investigations are needed to elucidate the relationship between physiologic pyloric sphincter measurements and clinical response to G-POP.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000903\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃经口幽门肌切开术(G-POP)是一种治疗难治性胃轻瘫的微创内镜技术。功能性管腔成像探头(FLIP)是一种测量胃肠道括约肌生理参数的内镜工具。在这项研究中,FLIP采用胃轻瘫主要症状指数(GCSI)来监测G-POP后幽门生理学测量与临床结果之间的关系。方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,48例胃轻瘫患者接受G-POP治疗难治性胃轻瘫。术前和术后分别用40mL和50mL球囊填充量的FLIP评估幽门的横截面积(CSA)、压力和膨胀指数(DI)。GCSI评分用于监测术前和g - pop后6周的临床症状。结果:技术成功率100%。术后6周,GCSI评分(0-5分)平均下降0.95 +/- 1.45分,其中恶心/呕吐和腹胀亚量表改善最大。50mL气囊填充体积下DI的变化是手术后症状改善的统计学显著预测指标,∆DI @ 50mL > 1.5mmHg/mm2与GCSI的较大改善密切相关(Pearson系数0.544,p = 0.036)。结论:在G-POP之前,EndoFLIP并不是临床成功的可靠预测指标,但测量术前和术后的变化可用于指导管理。需要进一步的研究来阐明幽门括约肌生理性测量与G-POP临床反应之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy effectiveness in management of all types of gastroparesis

Background

Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy (G-POP) is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for treating refractory gastroparesis (GP). The functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) is an endoscopic tool for measuring the physiologic parameters of the gastrointestinal sphincters. Here, FLIP was used to investigate the association between physiologic measurements of the pylorus and clinical outcomes after G-POP using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) to monitor clinical response.

Methods

This was a single-center prospective study of 48 patients with GP who underwent G-POP for the management of refractory GP. The cross-sectional area, pressure, and distensibility index (DI) of the pylorus were evaluated using FLIP at 40-mL and 50-mL balloon fill volumes pre- and postprocedurally. GCSI scores were used to monitor clinical symptoms both preprocedurally and at 6 weeks after G-POP.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients. GCSI scores (0−5) decreased by an average of 0.95 ± 1.45 points at 6 weeks postoperatively, with the nausea/vomiting and bloating subscales showing the greatest improvement. The change (∆) in DI at 50-mL balloon fill volumes was a statistically significant predictor of symptomatic improvement after the procedure, with ∆DI at 50 mL of >1.5 mm2/mm Hg strongly correlated with larger improvements in GCSI (Pearson coefficient: 0.544; P =.036).

Conclusion

The EndoFLIP was not found to be a reliable predictor of clinical success before G-POP. However, measuring changes pre- and postprocedurally can be used to guide management. Additional investigations are needed to elucidate the relationship between physiologic pyloric sphincter measurements and clinical response to G-POP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
Multimodal navigation technology for giant choledochal cyst resection: A precision surgical navigation strategy Endoscopic management of bile leaks after subtotal vs total laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single center comparative analysis Invited commentary on: “Perioperative delirium in older adult patients undergoing colectomy: are we screening enough?” Letter to the editor regarding “Split liver transplantation: bridging the gap between proven benefit and persistent underutilization” Redefining success after antireflux surgery: from acid control to mucosal recovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1