评估城市干预对骑自行车者行为改变的影响:以伦敦摄政运河拖道为例

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.012
Aiman Hasan Khan, Zahratu Shabrina
{"title":"评估城市干预对骑自行车者行为改变的影响:以伦敦摄政运河拖道为例","authors":"Aiman Hasan Khan,&nbsp;Zahratu Shabrina","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>London’s canals serve as blue corridors connecting people, creating inclusive recreation spaces, and improving health and well-being. The Regent’s Canal towpath, located in Islington and owned by the Canal and River Trust (CRT), is one of the busiest towpaths in the UK, offering East London residents a quick route into the city. Nevertheless, cyclists and pedestrians who regularly use the towpath for commuting have expressed concerns over its capacity to support rush hour traffic. This study utilises the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour change (COM-B) model to assess the impact of urban interventions in reducing conflict on the towpath and increasing uptake of the newly developed St. Peter’s People-Friendly Streets (PFS), a form of Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) effort by the local council. Employing a mixed methods approach, this paper triangulated data collected through online surveys, AI traffic monitoring sensors, and semi-structured interviews to create a concrete picture of cyclists’ behaviour change. Based on the study, we obtained findings that are twofold: (1) the interventions improved cyclists’ awareness of and physical access to the alternative route, although route information signage at the intervention site could have further optimised physical access; (2) cyclists were motivated to switch to the alternative route due to its potential to reduce towpath conflict, shorten commuting time, and offer better cycle infrastructure. However, safety considerations, routine towpath use, and the desire to maintain the natural connection provided by the towpath acted as barriers. Further, we found that combining ’hard’ and ’soft’ strategies is essential in driving behavioural change, as interventions targeted at the built environment should be balanced with communication strategies to improve awareness of new transport programmes and policies. Using a real-world case study, this paper offers actionable guidance for decision-makers to design and implement interventions that shift transport behaviours effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 373-390"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of urban interventions on cyclists’ behavioural change: The case of the Regent’s Canal towpath in London\",\"authors\":\"Aiman Hasan Khan,&nbsp;Zahratu Shabrina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>London’s canals serve as blue corridors connecting people, creating inclusive recreation spaces, and improving health and well-being. The Regent’s Canal towpath, located in Islington and owned by the Canal and River Trust (CRT), is one of the busiest towpaths in the UK, offering East London residents a quick route into the city. Nevertheless, cyclists and pedestrians who regularly use the towpath for commuting have expressed concerns over its capacity to support rush hour traffic. This study utilises the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour change (COM-B) model to assess the impact of urban interventions in reducing conflict on the towpath and increasing uptake of the newly developed St. Peter’s People-Friendly Streets (PFS), a form of Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) effort by the local council. Employing a mixed methods approach, this paper triangulated data collected through online surveys, AI traffic monitoring sensors, and semi-structured interviews to create a concrete picture of cyclists’ behaviour change. Based on the study, we obtained findings that are twofold: (1) the interventions improved cyclists’ awareness of and physical access to the alternative route, although route information signage at the intervention site could have further optimised physical access; (2) cyclists were motivated to switch to the alternative route due to its potential to reduce towpath conflict, shorten commuting time, and offer better cycle infrastructure. However, safety considerations, routine towpath use, and the desire to maintain the natural connection provided by the towpath acted as barriers. Further, we found that combining ’hard’ and ’soft’ strategies is essential in driving behavioural change, as interventions targeted at the built environment should be balanced with communication strategies to improve awareness of new transport programmes and policies. Using a real-world case study, this paper offers actionable guidance for decision-makers to design and implement interventions that shift transport behaviours effectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 373-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伦敦的运河作为连接人们的蓝色走廊,创造了包容性的娱乐空间,并改善了健康和福祉。摄政运河拖径位于伊斯灵顿,由运河和河流信托基金(CRT)拥有,是英国最繁忙的拖径之一,为东伦敦居民提供了一条快速进入城市的路线。然而,经常使用这条拖道上下班的骑自行车者和行人对它在高峰时段的交通能力表示担忧。本研究利用能力、机会和动机行为改变(COM-B)模型来评估城市干预措施在减少道路冲突和增加新开发的圣彼得人民友好街道(PFS)的吸收方面的影响,PFS是当地议会努力的一种低交通街区(LTN)形式。本文采用混合方法,对通过在线调查、人工智能交通监控传感器和半结构化访谈收集的数据进行三角分析,以创建骑车者行为变化的具体图景。研究结果表明:(1)干预措施提高了骑车人对替代路线的认知和实际可达性,尽管干预地点的路线信息标牌可以进一步优化物理可达性;(2)自行车骑行者之所以愿意选择替代路线,是因为它有可能减少导道冲突,缩短通勤时间,并提供更好的自行车基础设施。然而,安全方面的考虑、常规的拖道使用以及保持拖道提供的自然连接的愿望成为障碍。此外,我们发现结合“硬”和“软”策略对于推动行为改变至关重要,因为针对建筑环境的干预措施应该与沟通策略相平衡,以提高对新交通计划和政策的认识。本文通过一个现实世界的案例研究,为决策者设计和实施有效改变交通行为的干预措施提供了可行的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the impact of urban interventions on cyclists’ behavioural change: The case of the Regent’s Canal towpath in London
London’s canals serve as blue corridors connecting people, creating inclusive recreation spaces, and improving health and well-being. The Regent’s Canal towpath, located in Islington and owned by the Canal and River Trust (CRT), is one of the busiest towpaths in the UK, offering East London residents a quick route into the city. Nevertheless, cyclists and pedestrians who regularly use the towpath for commuting have expressed concerns over its capacity to support rush hour traffic. This study utilises the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour change (COM-B) model to assess the impact of urban interventions in reducing conflict on the towpath and increasing uptake of the newly developed St. Peter’s People-Friendly Streets (PFS), a form of Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) effort by the local council. Employing a mixed methods approach, this paper triangulated data collected through online surveys, AI traffic monitoring sensors, and semi-structured interviews to create a concrete picture of cyclists’ behaviour change. Based on the study, we obtained findings that are twofold: (1) the interventions improved cyclists’ awareness of and physical access to the alternative route, although route information signage at the intervention site could have further optimised physical access; (2) cyclists were motivated to switch to the alternative route due to its potential to reduce towpath conflict, shorten commuting time, and offer better cycle infrastructure. However, safety considerations, routine towpath use, and the desire to maintain the natural connection provided by the towpath acted as barriers. Further, we found that combining ’hard’ and ’soft’ strategies is essential in driving behavioural change, as interventions targeted at the built environment should be balanced with communication strategies to improve awareness of new transport programmes and policies. Using a real-world case study, this paper offers actionable guidance for decision-makers to design and implement interventions that shift transport behaviours effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Now or never: Eye tracking and response times reveal the dynamics of highway merging decisions From messages to movements: how emotional reactions to message frames activate consumption goals to shape students' public transport usage intention Modelling the impact of Bikeability cycle training on the number of people killed or seriously injured on UK roads Editorial Board Predicting driver retention in ride-hailing platforms: an empirical study of socio-demographic and behavioral influences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1