Shu Kato, Kaede Baba, Kanako Mamishin, Mao Uematsu, Mai Shimura, Akira Hirota, Misao Fukuda, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Takehiro Nakao, Hiromichi Nakajima, Chikako Funasaka, Chihiro Kondoh, Kenichi Harano, Yoichi Naito, Nobuaki Matsubara, Ako Hosono, Toshikatsu Kawasaki, Toru Mukohara
{"title":"调整血清肌酐的卡铂给药设计对卡铂加紫杉醇治疗卵巢癌的影响","authors":"Shu Kato, Kaede Baba, Kanako Mamishin, Mao Uematsu, Mai Shimura, Akira Hirota, Misao Fukuda, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Takehiro Nakao, Hiromichi Nakajima, Chikako Funasaka, Chihiro Kondoh, Kenichi Harano, Yoichi Naito, Nobuaki Matsubara, Ako Hosono, Toshikatsu Kawasaki, Toru Mukohara","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Carboplatin (CBDCA) is a mainstay of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer and its dose is determined in proportion to the estimated creatinine clearance (CCr). Serum creatinine (SCr) values necessary to estimate CCr vary by measurement method: adding 0.2 mg/dL to SCr by enzymatic methods commonly used in Japan equates to SCr calculated using the Jaffe method, which is widely adopted outside Japan. Although adjustment by adding 0.2 mg/dL to SCr by enzymatic methods may avoid the potential overdose of CBDCA, its impact on the dose intensity (DI) of chemotherapy is unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively studied patients with ovarian cancer treated with CBDCA + paclitaxel (PTX) (TC) after primary surgery. Patients were classified into Cohort A (dose-dense [dd-]TC, SCr-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 18), B (dd-TC, non-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 8), C (tri-weekly [tw-]TC, SCr-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 6), and D (tw-TC, non-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 15), and DI and DI-related measures including average relative DI (ARDI, [RDI of CBDCA + RDI of PTX]/2]) known to correlate with patients’ prognoses were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Although the DI of CBDCA did not differ between Cohorts A and B, the DI of PTX and proportion of patients with ARDI ≥ 85% were higher in Cohort A than B (78 vs. 13%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) as a result of less frequent treatment modification. There was no difference in these measures between Cohorts C and D.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Adjustment of SCr when calculating the CBDCA dose did not compromise the DI of total CBDCA and may rather contribute to maintaining DI in patients receiving dd-TC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70804","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Carboplatin Dosing Design Using Adjusted Serum Creatinine on Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel Therapy for Ovarian Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Shu Kato, Kaede Baba, Kanako Mamishin, Mao Uematsu, Mai Shimura, Akira Hirota, Misao Fukuda, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Takehiro Nakao, Hiromichi Nakajima, Chikako Funasaka, Chihiro Kondoh, Kenichi Harano, Yoichi Naito, Nobuaki Matsubara, Ako Hosono, Toshikatsu Kawasaki, Toru Mukohara\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Carboplatin (CBDCA) is a mainstay of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer and its dose is determined in proportion to the estimated creatinine clearance (CCr). Serum creatinine (SCr) values necessary to estimate CCr vary by measurement method: adding 0.2 mg/dL to SCr by enzymatic methods commonly used in Japan equates to SCr calculated using the Jaffe method, which is widely adopted outside Japan. Although adjustment by adding 0.2 mg/dL to SCr by enzymatic methods may avoid the potential overdose of CBDCA, its impact on the dose intensity (DI) of chemotherapy is unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively studied patients with ovarian cancer treated with CBDCA + paclitaxel (PTX) (TC) after primary surgery. Patients were classified into Cohort A (dose-dense [dd-]TC, SCr-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 18), B (dd-TC, non-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 8), C (tri-weekly [tw-]TC, SCr-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 6), and D (tw-TC, non-adjusted, <i>n</i> = 15), and DI and DI-related measures including average relative DI (ARDI, [RDI of CBDCA + RDI of PTX]/2]) known to correlate with patients’ prognoses were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although the DI of CBDCA did not differ between Cohorts A and B, the DI of PTX and proportion of patients with ARDI ≥ 85% were higher in Cohort A than B (78 vs. 13%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) as a result of less frequent treatment modification. There was no difference in these measures between Cohorts C and D.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adjustment of SCr when calculating the CBDCA dose did not compromise the DI of total CBDCA and may rather contribute to maintaining DI in patients receiving dd-TC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70804\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70804\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 卡铂(CBDCA)是卵巢癌化疗的主要药物,其剂量根据估计的肌酐清除率(CCr)按比例确定。估算 CCr 所需的血清肌酐 (SCr) 值因测量方法而异:在日本常用的酶法 SCr 基础上增加 0.2 毫克/分升,就等于用日本以外广泛采用的 Jaffe 法计算出的 SCr。虽然在酶法 SCr 的基础上增加 0.2 mg/dL 可以避免 CBDCA 的潜在过量,但其对化疗剂量强度(DI)的影响尚不明确。 方法 我们对卵巢癌患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者在初次手术后接受了 CBDCA + 紫杉醇(PTX)(TC)治疗。患者被分为 A 组(剂量密集型 [dd-]TC,SCr 调整,n = 18)、B 组(dd-TC,非调整,n = 8)、C 组(三周 [tw-]TC ,SCr 调整,n = 6)和 D 组(tw-TC、比较了 DI 和 DI 相关指标,包括已知与患者预后相关的平均相对 DI(ARDI,[CBDCA 的 RDI + PTX 的 RDI]/2])。 结果 虽然 CBDCA 的 DI 在 A 组和 B 组之间没有差异,但 PTX 的 DI 和 ARDI ≥ 85% 的患者比例在 A 组高于 B 组(78 vs. 13%,p = 0.002),这是因为治疗调整的频率较低。结论 在计算 CBDCA 剂量时调整 SCr 不会影响总 CBDCA 的 DI,反而可能有助于维持接受 dd-TC 患者的 DI。
The Impact of Carboplatin Dosing Design Using Adjusted Serum Creatinine on Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel Therapy for Ovarian Cancer
Background
Carboplatin (CBDCA) is a mainstay of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer and its dose is determined in proportion to the estimated creatinine clearance (CCr). Serum creatinine (SCr) values necessary to estimate CCr vary by measurement method: adding 0.2 mg/dL to SCr by enzymatic methods commonly used in Japan equates to SCr calculated using the Jaffe method, which is widely adopted outside Japan. Although adjustment by adding 0.2 mg/dL to SCr by enzymatic methods may avoid the potential overdose of CBDCA, its impact on the dose intensity (DI) of chemotherapy is unclear.
Methods
We retrospectively studied patients with ovarian cancer treated with CBDCA + paclitaxel (PTX) (TC) after primary surgery. Patients were classified into Cohort A (dose-dense [dd-]TC, SCr-adjusted, n = 18), B (dd-TC, non-adjusted, n = 8), C (tri-weekly [tw-]TC, SCr-adjusted, n = 6), and D (tw-TC, non-adjusted, n = 15), and DI and DI-related measures including average relative DI (ARDI, [RDI of CBDCA + RDI of PTX]/2]) known to correlate with patients’ prognoses were compared.
Results
Although the DI of CBDCA did not differ between Cohorts A and B, the DI of PTX and proportion of patients with ARDI ≥ 85% were higher in Cohort A than B (78 vs. 13%, p = 0.002) as a result of less frequent treatment modification. There was no difference in these measures between Cohorts C and D.
Conclusion
Adjustment of SCr when calculating the CBDCA dose did not compromise the DI of total CBDCA and may rather contribute to maintaining DI in patients receiving dd-TC.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.