开发和验证OSATS工具形成性评估牙科学生的牙髓通道打开技能。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International endodontic journal Pub Date : 2026-05-10 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1111/iej.14230
Juzer Shabbir, Qamar Riaz, Shanila Sohail
{"title":"开发和验证OSATS工具形成性评估牙科学生的牙髓通道打开技能。","authors":"Juzer Shabbir,&nbsp;Qamar Riaz,&nbsp;Shanila Sohail","doi":"10.1111/iej.14230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Endodontic Access Cavity (EAC) opening is a critical step in Root Canal Treatment. yet, a robust formative assessment tool for this procedure is lacking in the literature. Therefore, the overarching goal of our study was to develop and validate an OSATS tool specifically for the formative assessment of EAC opening skill. The specific objectives of our study were (1) to evaluate the ability of the performance ratings on the newly developed OSATS tool in differentiating between different levels of dental students (Final year students [FY] and House officers [HO]) in the EAC opening procedure on extracted natural teeth and (2)-to determine the inter-rater reliability of the newly developed OSATS tool in assessing the EAC opening procedure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>Conducted over 6 months in 2024, the tool was developed collaboratively by an endodontic expert (EE) and two medical educationists, following an extensive literature review. Performance rubrics and guidelines were devised, and the tool underwent two review cycles by 11 EEs, achieving satisfactory Content Validity Index scores (Scale-CVI: 0.9, Universal agreement: 0.7). Two trained assessors applied the tool to evaluate 30 students (15 FY, 15 HO) across three tooth types (anterior, premolar, molar), generating 180 OSATS forms. Data analysis in IBM SPSS v24 assessed inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and group performance differences (Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>, Kruskal-Wallis <i>H</i>-tests).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Inter-rater reliability (0.83) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83) were strong. HO significantly outperformed FY (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) on pre-access, initial access and final access sub-scales, with superior global ratings on premolars (<i>p</i> = .003). HO exhibited significant performance differences across sub-scales for anterior, premolar and molar teeth (<i>p</i> &lt; .05), excelling on premolars and anteriors compared to molars.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The newly developed OSATS tool demonstrated strong internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. It effectively differentiated performance ratings across various student levels and tooth types, establishing itself as a reliable and effective instrument for formative assessment of access cavity opening skill in endodontics.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":"59 6","pages":"1070-1082"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of OSATS tool for formative assessment of dental students' endodontic access cavity opening skills\",\"authors\":\"Juzer Shabbir,&nbsp;Qamar Riaz,&nbsp;Shanila Sohail\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iej.14230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Endodontic Access Cavity (EAC) opening is a critical step in Root Canal Treatment. yet, a robust formative assessment tool for this procedure is lacking in the literature. Therefore, the overarching goal of our study was to develop and validate an OSATS tool specifically for the formative assessment of EAC opening skill. The specific objectives of our study were (1) to evaluate the ability of the performance ratings on the newly developed OSATS tool in differentiating between different levels of dental students (Final year students [FY] and House officers [HO]) in the EAC opening procedure on extracted natural teeth and (2)-to determine the inter-rater reliability of the newly developed OSATS tool in assessing the EAC opening procedure.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>Conducted over 6 months in 2024, the tool was developed collaboratively by an endodontic expert (EE) and two medical educationists, following an extensive literature review. Performance rubrics and guidelines were devised, and the tool underwent two review cycles by 11 EEs, achieving satisfactory Content Validity Index scores (Scale-CVI: 0.9, Universal agreement: 0.7). Two trained assessors applied the tool to evaluate 30 students (15 FY, 15 HO) across three tooth types (anterior, premolar, molar), generating 180 OSATS forms. Data analysis in IBM SPSS v24 assessed inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and group performance differences (Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>, Kruskal-Wallis <i>H</i>-tests).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Inter-rater reliability (0.83) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83) were strong. HO significantly outperformed FY (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) on pre-access, initial access and final access sub-scales, with superior global ratings on premolars (<i>p</i> = .003). HO exhibited significant performance differences across sub-scales for anterior, premolar and molar teeth (<i>p</i> &lt; .05), excelling on premolars and anteriors compared to molars.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The newly developed OSATS tool demonstrated strong internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. It effectively differentiated performance ratings across various student levels and tooth types, establishing itself as a reliable and effective instrument for formative assessment of access cavity opening skill in endodontics.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"1070-1082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14230\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根管通道打开是根管治疗的关键步骤。然而,对于这一过程,文献中缺乏一个强有力的形成性评估工具。因此,我们研究的首要目标是开发和验证一个专门用于EAC打开技能形成性评估的OSATS工具。我们研究的具体目的是:(1)评估新开发的OSATS工具在区分不同水平的牙科学生(大四学生[FY]和House officers [HO])在拔除自然牙的EAC打开程序中的表现评级的能力;(2)确定新开发的OSATS工具在评估EAC打开程序中的评级可靠性。方法:该工具于2024年进行了6个多月的研究,由一名牙髓专家(EE)和两名医学教育家在广泛的文献综述后共同开发。设计了性能规则和指南,11个ee对该工具进行了两次评估,达到了令人满意的内容效度指数得分(量表- cvi: 0.9,普遍一致性:0.7)。两名训练有素的评估员应用该工具评估了30名学生(15名FY, 15名HO)的三种牙齿类型(前牙、前磨牙、磨牙),生成了180张OSATS表格。在IBM SPSS v24中进行数据分析,评估了评分者之间的信度(类内相关性)、内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha)和群体绩效差异(Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis h检验)。结果:评价者间信度(0.83)和内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83)较强。结论:新开发的OSATS工具具有很强的内部一致性和评分间可靠性。它有效地区分了不同学生水平和牙齿类型的表现评级,确立了自己作为牙髓学通道腔打开技能形成性评估的可靠和有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of OSATS tool for formative assessment of dental students' endodontic access cavity opening skills

Aim

Endodontic Access Cavity (EAC) opening is a critical step in Root Canal Treatment. yet, a robust formative assessment tool for this procedure is lacking in the literature. Therefore, the overarching goal of our study was to develop and validate an OSATS tool specifically for the formative assessment of EAC opening skill. The specific objectives of our study were (1) to evaluate the ability of the performance ratings on the newly developed OSATS tool in differentiating between different levels of dental students (Final year students [FY] and House officers [HO]) in the EAC opening procedure on extracted natural teeth and (2)-to determine the inter-rater reliability of the newly developed OSATS tool in assessing the EAC opening procedure.

Methodology

Conducted over 6 months in 2024, the tool was developed collaboratively by an endodontic expert (EE) and two medical educationists, following an extensive literature review. Performance rubrics and guidelines were devised, and the tool underwent two review cycles by 11 EEs, achieving satisfactory Content Validity Index scores (Scale-CVI: 0.9, Universal agreement: 0.7). Two trained assessors applied the tool to evaluate 30 students (15 FY, 15 HO) across three tooth types (anterior, premolar, molar), generating 180 OSATS forms. Data analysis in IBM SPSS v24 assessed inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and group performance differences (Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis H-tests).

Results

Inter-rater reliability (0.83) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83) were strong. HO significantly outperformed FY (p < .05) on pre-access, initial access and final access sub-scales, with superior global ratings on premolars (p = .003). HO exhibited significant performance differences across sub-scales for anterior, premolar and molar teeth (p < .05), excelling on premolars and anteriors compared to molars.

Conclusions

The newly developed OSATS tool demonstrated strong internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. It effectively differentiated performance ratings across various student levels and tooth types, establishing itself as a reliable and effective instrument for formative assessment of access cavity opening skill in endodontics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
期刊最新文献
Large language model-driven Socratic questioning for endodontic case analysis: A randomised controlled trial. RE: The Survival and Success of Teeth With External Cervical Resorption: A Multi-Centre, Retrospective Study. Reciprocating Kinematics in Endodontics: 18 Years of Scientific Evolution and Global Research Trends. Multicenter RCT 6-Year Survival of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns: 90° Shoulder Versus Butt-Joint Margins. Endodontic Treatment of Apical Periodontitis Mitigates Systemic Inflammation and Restores the Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity in an In Vitro Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1