伊朗乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿需求简易问卷的编制

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70832
Mozhgan Kazemzadeh, Asiie Olfatbakhsh, Sara Dorri
{"title":"伊朗乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿需求简易问卷的编制","authors":"Mozhgan Kazemzadeh,&nbsp;Asiie Olfatbakhsh,&nbsp;Sara Dorri","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The informational needs of patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) have not been sufficiently addressed in the scientific literature. Moreover, the only existing questionnaire in this field contains many items. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a short-form version of this questionnaire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The questionnaire items were extracted from the Lymphoedema Needs Questionnaire-Breast Cancer (LNQ-<span>BC</span>). Demographic variables and clinical characteristics were considered separately. Out of 62 items, 24 were selected, and 2 additional questions were included based on feedback from 10 experts. 100 participants with BCRL completed the short-form questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed using principal components extraction and varimax rotation, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated for each dimension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After evaluating the content validity, the instrument's construct validity with 26 items was conducted using EFA. The KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) value was equal to 0.879 and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001), indicating the data's adequacy and appropriateness to perform EFA. Five extracted dimensions were named: “Lymphedema information needs” (5 items), “Informational support, peers” (5 items), “Access to a lymphedema care specialist” (5 items), “Physical and daily activities” (7 items) and “Financial issues and compression garments” (4 items). The level of needs in this study in all dimensions was high (more than 77%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The high factor loadings and the total explained variance of 78.152% support the construct validity of the short questionnaire. Although some items exhibited cross-loadings, the majority loaded strongly on a single factor, indicating good discriminant validity. Providing services according to the needs of patients can be prioritized. Healthcare providers, insurers, and individuals should be better informed about lymphedema, its associated costs, and the importance of implementing appropriate management programs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70832","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the Short-Form of Lymphedema Needs Questionnaire for Iranian Breast Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Mozhgan Kazemzadeh,&nbsp;Asiie Olfatbakhsh,&nbsp;Sara Dorri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The informational needs of patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) have not been sufficiently addressed in the scientific literature. Moreover, the only existing questionnaire in this field contains many items. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a short-form version of this questionnaire.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The questionnaire items were extracted from the Lymphoedema Needs Questionnaire-Breast Cancer (LNQ-<span>BC</span>). Demographic variables and clinical characteristics were considered separately. Out of 62 items, 24 were selected, and 2 additional questions were included based on feedback from 10 experts. 100 participants with BCRL completed the short-form questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed using principal components extraction and varimax rotation, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated for each dimension.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>After evaluating the content validity, the instrument's construct validity with 26 items was conducted using EFA. The KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) value was equal to 0.879 and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001), indicating the data's adequacy and appropriateness to perform EFA. Five extracted dimensions were named: “Lymphedema information needs” (5 items), “Informational support, peers” (5 items), “Access to a lymphedema care specialist” (5 items), “Physical and daily activities” (7 items) and “Financial issues and compression garments” (4 items). The level of needs in this study in all dimensions was high (more than 77%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The high factor loadings and the total explained variance of 78.152% support the construct validity of the short questionnaire. Although some items exhibited cross-loadings, the majority loaded strongly on a single factor, indicating good discriminant validity. Providing services according to the needs of patients can be prioritized. Healthcare providers, insurers, and individuals should be better informed about lymphedema, its associated costs, and the importance of implementing appropriate management programs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70832\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)患者的信息需求在科学文献中尚未得到充分的解决。此外,该领域唯一的现有问卷包含许多项目。因此,本研究的目的是开发该问卷的简短版本。方法从《乳腺癌淋巴水肿需求问卷》(LNQ-BC)中抽取问卷内容。人口统计学变量和临床特征被分开考虑。在62个问题中,选择了24个问题,并根据10名专家的反馈增加了2个问题。100名患有BCRL的参与者完成了简短的问卷调查。采用主成分提取和变量旋转法进行探索性因子分析(EFA),并计算各维度的Cronbach’s alpha。结果经内容效度评定后,采用EFA法对量表26个项目进行构念效度评定。KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin)值为0.879,Bartlett球度检验显著(p值<; 0.001),表明数据进行EFA的充分性和适宜性。提取的五个维度被命名为:“淋巴水肿信息需求”(5项),“信息支持,同伴”(5项),“获得淋巴水肿护理专家”(5项),“身体和日常活动”(7项)和“财务问题和压缩服装”(4项)。本研究中所有维度的需求水平都很高(超过77%)。结论短问卷具有较高的因子负荷和78.152%的总解释方差,具有较高的结构效度。虽然有些项目表现出交叉加载,但大多数项目在单一因素上加载强烈,表明良好的区分效度。根据病人的需要提供服务是可以优先考虑的。医疗保健提供者、保险公司和个人应该更好地了解淋巴水肿及其相关费用,以及实施适当管理方案的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing the Short-Form of Lymphedema Needs Questionnaire for Iranian Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

The informational needs of patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) have not been sufficiently addressed in the scientific literature. Moreover, the only existing questionnaire in this field contains many items. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a short-form version of this questionnaire.

Methods

The questionnaire items were extracted from the Lymphoedema Needs Questionnaire-Breast Cancer (LNQ-BC). Demographic variables and clinical characteristics were considered separately. Out of 62 items, 24 were selected, and 2 additional questions were included based on feedback from 10 experts. 100 participants with BCRL completed the short-form questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed using principal components extraction and varimax rotation, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated for each dimension.

Results

After evaluating the content validity, the instrument's construct validity with 26 items was conducted using EFA. The KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) value was equal to 0.879 and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (p-value < 0.001), indicating the data's adequacy and appropriateness to perform EFA. Five extracted dimensions were named: “Lymphedema information needs” (5 items), “Informational support, peers” (5 items), “Access to a lymphedema care specialist” (5 items), “Physical and daily activities” (7 items) and “Financial issues and compression garments” (4 items). The level of needs in this study in all dimensions was high (more than 77%).

Conclusions

The high factor loadings and the total explained variance of 78.152% support the construct validity of the short questionnaire. Although some items exhibited cross-loadings, the majority loaded strongly on a single factor, indicating good discriminant validity. Providing services according to the needs of patients can be prioritized. Healthcare providers, insurers, and individuals should be better informed about lymphedema, its associated costs, and the importance of implementing appropriate management programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
期刊最新文献
Clonal Hematopoiesis in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Implications Proteomic Differentiation of Colorectal Cancer From Normal Tissue via Ex Vivo E-Biopsy: A Novel Approach to Molecular Sampling for Diagnostic Precision Current Advances of Molecular Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsies Techniques in Ovarian Cancer Multivariable Radiomics Model for Predicting Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Perspectives on Education From Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancer Patients in the Deep South: Qualitative Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1