口腔面裂和疑似罗宾序列的产前护理组织:一项欧洲调查。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011312
Shirley van de Velde, Christine L van Velzen, Peter G Scheffer, Aebele B Mink van der Molen
{"title":"口腔面裂和疑似罗宾序列的产前护理组织:一项欧洲调查。","authors":"Shirley van de Velde, Christine L van Velzen, Peter G Scheffer, Aebele B Mink van der Molen","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in prenatal imaging and genetic testing have improved the detection of orofacial anomalies, allowing for early diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This study aims to provide an overview of current prenatal care practices for orofacial clefts and/or suspected Robin sequence (RS) across European countries and to identify disparities to inform future improvements. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care professionals affiliated with the European Reference Network CRANIO, collecting data on prenatal imaging, genetic testing, counseling, and termination of pregnancy. Responses were obtained from 31 health care professionals in 27 hospitals across 17 European countries. All participating countries have some sort of prenatal screening program. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1 or 2 timepoints during pregnancy, with varying techniques used to assess orofacial structures. Fetal MRI was performed in 59% of centers, primarily for multiple (severe) anomalies. Centers utilizing specific imaging techniques reported fewer missed diagnoses. Prenatal genetic testing was available in 96% of centers, with array-based copy number variation and whole-exome sequencing performed in 59% and 52% of centers, respectively. Nearly half of the centers provided multidisciplinary counseling, with team composition and session frequency varying widely. Pregnancy termination for orofacial clefts or micro-/retrognathia was not legal in 7 countries. Termination rates and trends differed across centers. In conclusion, variability exists in prenatal care for orofacial clefts and/or suspected RS across Europe, particularly in imaging techniques, genetic testing, and pregnancy termination practices. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and equitable access to multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes for affected pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"3054-3059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12537042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organization of Prenatal Care in Orofacial Clefts and Suspected Robin Sequence: A European Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Shirley van de Velde, Christine L van Velzen, Peter G Scheffer, Aebele B Mink van der Molen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advances in prenatal imaging and genetic testing have improved the detection of orofacial anomalies, allowing for early diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This study aims to provide an overview of current prenatal care practices for orofacial clefts and/or suspected Robin sequence (RS) across European countries and to identify disparities to inform future improvements. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care professionals affiliated with the European Reference Network CRANIO, collecting data on prenatal imaging, genetic testing, counseling, and termination of pregnancy. Responses were obtained from 31 health care professionals in 27 hospitals across 17 European countries. All participating countries have some sort of prenatal screening program. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1 or 2 timepoints during pregnancy, with varying techniques used to assess orofacial structures. Fetal MRI was performed in 59% of centers, primarily for multiple (severe) anomalies. Centers utilizing specific imaging techniques reported fewer missed diagnoses. Prenatal genetic testing was available in 96% of centers, with array-based copy number variation and whole-exome sequencing performed in 59% and 52% of centers, respectively. Nearly half of the centers provided multidisciplinary counseling, with team composition and session frequency varying widely. Pregnancy termination for orofacial clefts or micro-/retrognathia was not legal in 7 countries. Termination rates and trends differed across centers. In conclusion, variability exists in prenatal care for orofacial clefts and/or suspected RS across Europe, particularly in imaging techniques, genetic testing, and pregnancy termination practices. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and equitable access to multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes for affected pregnancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3054-3059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12537042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011312\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产前成像和基因检测的进步提高了对口面部异常的检测,允许早期诊断和全面咨询。本研究旨在概述目前在欧洲国家对口面部裂和/或疑似罗宾序列(RS)的产前护理实践,并确定差异,为未来的改进提供信息。向隶属于欧洲参考网络CRANIO的保健专业人员分发了一项横断面调查,收集有关产前成像、基因检测、咨询和终止妊娠的数据。从17个欧洲国家27家医院的31名卫生保健专业人员那里获得了答复。所有参与国都有某种形式的产前筛查项目。在妊娠期间的1或2个时间点进行超声检查,使用不同的技术来评估口面部结构。59%的中心进行了胎儿MRI检查,主要用于多发(严重)异常。使用特定成像技术的中心报告漏诊较少。96%的中心提供产前基因检测,59%的中心提供基于阵列的拷贝数变异和52%的中心提供全外显子组测序。近一半的中心提供多学科咨询,团队组成和会议频率差异很大。在7个国家,因口面部裂或微颌畸形/后颌畸形而终止妊娠是不合法的。终止率和趋势在各中心有所不同。总之,欧洲各地对口面裂和/或疑似RS的产前护理存在差异,特别是在成像技术、基因检测和终止妊娠实践方面。这些发现强调需要制定标准化的指导方针和公平获得多学科护理,以优化受影响妊娠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organization of Prenatal Care in Orofacial Clefts and Suspected Robin Sequence: A European Survey.

Advances in prenatal imaging and genetic testing have improved the detection of orofacial anomalies, allowing for early diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This study aims to provide an overview of current prenatal care practices for orofacial clefts and/or suspected Robin sequence (RS) across European countries and to identify disparities to inform future improvements. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care professionals affiliated with the European Reference Network CRANIO, collecting data on prenatal imaging, genetic testing, counseling, and termination of pregnancy. Responses were obtained from 31 health care professionals in 27 hospitals across 17 European countries. All participating countries have some sort of prenatal screening program. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1 or 2 timepoints during pregnancy, with varying techniques used to assess orofacial structures. Fetal MRI was performed in 59% of centers, primarily for multiple (severe) anomalies. Centers utilizing specific imaging techniques reported fewer missed diagnoses. Prenatal genetic testing was available in 96% of centers, with array-based copy number variation and whole-exome sequencing performed in 59% and 52% of centers, respectively. Nearly half of the centers provided multidisciplinary counseling, with team composition and session frequency varying widely. Pregnancy termination for orofacial clefts or micro-/retrognathia was not legal in 7 countries. Termination rates and trends differed across centers. In conclusion, variability exists in prenatal care for orofacial clefts and/or suspected RS across Europe, particularly in imaging techniques, genetic testing, and pregnancy termination practices. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and equitable access to multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes for affected pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Age at Surgery Associated With Increased Expressive Language Delays in Children With Single Suture Craniosynostosis. Mixed Reality-Assisted Osteotomy Guidance for Single-Stage Skull Tumor Resection and Cranial Reconstruction: A Brief Clinical Study. Traumatic Orbital Emphysema Mimicking an Orbital Floor Fracture. Review of "Impact of Private Equity Acquisition of Hospitals on Surgical Outcomes" by Rashid Z et al. Ann Surg 2026;283(1):92-99. Scientific Accuracy of Large Language Models in Tilted Implant Dentistry: A Guideline-Based Comparative Evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1