纵隔肿瘤机器人切除术:手术入路和程序。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02843-7
Hiroe Aoshima, Motoka Omata, Hiroaki Shidei, Akira Ogihara, Shota Mitsuboshi, Tamami Isaka, Takako Matsumoto, Masato Kanzaki
{"title":"纵隔肿瘤机器人切除术:手术入路和程序。","authors":"Hiroe Aoshima, Motoka Omata, Hiroaki Shidei, Akira Ogihara, Shota Mitsuboshi, Tamami Isaka, Takako Matsumoto, Masato Kanzaki","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02843-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mediastinal tumors (MTs) develop in various sites within the thoracic cavity, and the robotic surgical approach for MTs varies depending on the tumor location. This study aimed to assess the optimal approach for robotic surgery for MTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2012 to May 2023, 141 cases of MTs removed by robotic surgery were noted. Of these, 130 cases, excluding those with combined lung resection, combined chest wall resection, and biopsy, were investigated for the MT location, surgical approach, operative time, and console time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 61 were male and 69 were female, with a median age of 60 (16-85) years and a median tumor diameter of 23 (2.5-150) mm. Additionally, 5 upper MTs, 99 anterior MTs, 22 middle MTs, and 4 posterior MTs were observed. The median operative and console time was 146 (38-371) and 76 (14-239) min, respectively. All cases, except for one case of the upper and middle MTs, were operated in the lateral position via a lateral approach. Of the 99 anterior MTs, 87, 9, and 3 were operated via lateral approach, subxiphoid approach, and single incision, respectively. Of the 87 patients who underwent the lateral approach, 78 and 12 underwent surgery in the 30° lateral decubitus position and lateral positions, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardizing the robotic surgery approach for MTs on the basis of tumor location enhances procedural safety and feasibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic resection of mediastinal tumors: surgical approach and procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroe Aoshima, Motoka Omata, Hiroaki Shidei, Akira Ogihara, Shota Mitsuboshi, Tamami Isaka, Takako Matsumoto, Masato Kanzaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-02843-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mediastinal tumors (MTs) develop in various sites within the thoracic cavity, and the robotic surgical approach for MTs varies depending on the tumor location. This study aimed to assess the optimal approach for robotic surgery for MTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2012 to May 2023, 141 cases of MTs removed by robotic surgery were noted. Of these, 130 cases, excluding those with combined lung resection, combined chest wall resection, and biopsy, were investigated for the MT location, surgical approach, operative time, and console time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 61 were male and 69 were female, with a median age of 60 (16-85) years and a median tumor diameter of 23 (2.5-150) mm. Additionally, 5 upper MTs, 99 anterior MTs, 22 middle MTs, and 4 posterior MTs were observed. The median operative and console time was 146 (38-371) and 76 (14-239) min, respectively. All cases, except for one case of the upper and middle MTs, were operated in the lateral position via a lateral approach. Of the 99 anterior MTs, 87, 9, and 3 were operated via lateral approach, subxiphoid approach, and single incision, respectively. Of the 87 patients who underwent the lateral approach, 78 and 12 underwent surgery in the 30° lateral decubitus position and lateral positions, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardizing the robotic surgery approach for MTs on the basis of tumor location enhances procedural safety and feasibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02843-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02843-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:纵隔肿瘤(MTs)发生在胸腔内的不同部位,机器人手术入路因肿瘤位置而异。方法:2012年4月至2023年5月,对141例经机器人手术切除的MTs进行了回顾性分析。其中,除联合肺切除、联合胸壁切除和活检外,对130例患者进行MT位置、手术入路、手术时间和控制时间的调查。结果:参与者中,男性61例,女性69例,中位年龄为60(16-85)岁,中位肿瘤直径为23 (2.5-150)mm。另外,观察到5例上端mtts, 99例前端mtts, 22例中端mtts, 4例后端mtts。中位手术时间为146 (38-371)min,中位手术时间为76 (14-239)min。除1例上、中部mt外,所有病例均通过外侧入路在外侧位进行手术。在99例前路MTs中,分别有87例、9例和3例采用外侧入路、剑突下入路和单切口。在87例采用外侧入路的患者中,分别有78例和12例采用30°外侧卧位和侧卧位手术。结论:基于肿瘤定位规范MTs机器人手术方式,提高手术安全性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robotic resection of mediastinal tumors: surgical approach and procedure.

Background: Mediastinal tumors (MTs) develop in various sites within the thoracic cavity, and the robotic surgical approach for MTs varies depending on the tumor location. This study aimed to assess the optimal approach for robotic surgery for MTs.

Methods: From April 2012 to May 2023, 141 cases of MTs removed by robotic surgery were noted. Of these, 130 cases, excluding those with combined lung resection, combined chest wall resection, and biopsy, were investigated for the MT location, surgical approach, operative time, and console time.

Results: Of the participants, 61 were male and 69 were female, with a median age of 60 (16-85) years and a median tumor diameter of 23 (2.5-150) mm. Additionally, 5 upper MTs, 99 anterior MTs, 22 middle MTs, and 4 posterior MTs were observed. The median operative and console time was 146 (38-371) and 76 (14-239) min, respectively. All cases, except for one case of the upper and middle MTs, were operated in the lateral position via a lateral approach. Of the 99 anterior MTs, 87, 9, and 3 were operated via lateral approach, subxiphoid approach, and single incision, respectively. Of the 87 patients who underwent the lateral approach, 78 and 12 underwent surgery in the 30° lateral decubitus position and lateral positions, respectively.

Conclusions: Standardizing the robotic surgery approach for MTs on the basis of tumor location enhances procedural safety and feasibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating bellwether surgical outcomes in Ethiopia: insights from a multicentre 7-day prospective cohort study. Glomus vagale masquerading as a carotid body tumor: A diagnostic surprise - A Case Report. Effects of preoperative CALLY index and intraoperative LCA preservation on postoperative complications and LARS following robot-assisted mid and low rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study. A randomised controlled, prospective trial protocol comparing MID-MIS approaches for the treatment of discogenic low back pain: clinical outcomes, complication rates, and treatment costs in MIDLIF vs. MIS-TLIF. Optimal quantitative metrics reflecting surgeons' qualitative evaluation in deep learning-based intraoperative anatomy recognition task: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1